| Literature DB >> 24710108 |
Qian Geng1, Tao Zhang1, Yunfang Ding2, Yunzhen Tao2, Yuzun Lin1, Yunzhong Wang2, Steven Black3, Genming Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dissemination of antibiotic resistant clones is recognized as an important factor in the emergence and prevalence of resistance in pneumococcus. This study was undertaken to survey the antimicrobial susceptibility and serotypes distribution of pneumococci and to explore the circulating clones in hospitalized children in Suzhou, China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24710108 PMCID: PMC3977860 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The demographic and clinical characteristics of 175 enrolled patients.
| Characteristics | No. | Percentage (%) | |
| Gender | Male | 121 | 69.1 |
| Female | 54 | 30.9 | |
| Age (y) | 0- | 82 | 46.9 |
| 1- | 50 | 28.6 | |
| 2- | 14 | 8.0 | |
| 3- | 22 | 12.6 | |
| 4–5 | 7 | 4.0 | |
| Diseases | Pneumonia | 157 | 89.7 |
| Upper respiratory infections | 4 | 2.2 | |
| Septicemia | 2 | 1.1 | |
| Others | 12 | 6.9 |
Note:
Others included bronchitis, asthma, acute bronchiolitis and acute laryngotracheal bronchitis.
Antimicrobial susceptibility and MICs of 175 S.pneumoniae strains isolated from respiratory infection Children younger than 5 years.
| Antibiotic agents | MIC (μg/ml) | No. of isolates (%) | Non-susceptible rate (%) | ||||
| 50% | 90% | range | Resistant | Intermediate | Susceptible | ||
| Erythromycin | ≥1 | ≥1 | ≥1 | 175(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 100.0 |
| Penicillin G | 2 | ≥8 | ≤0.031–≥8 | 20(11.4) | 49(28.0) | 106(60.6) | 39.4 |
| Cefotaxime | 2 | ≥4 | ≤0.06–>4 | 43(24.6) | 54(30.9) | 78(44.6) | 55.4 |
| Ceftriaxone | 1 | ≥4 | ≤0.06–≥4 | 14(22.6) | 10(16.1) | 38(61.3) | 38.7 |
| Amoxicillin | ≤2 | ≥8 | ≤0.06–≥8 | 44(25.1) | 30(17.1) | 101(57.7) | 42.3 |
| Co-trimoxazole | ≥4 | 16 | ≤0.5–≥32 | 147(84.0) | 19(10.9) | 9(5.1) | 94.9 |
| Clindamycin | ≥1 | ≥1 | ≥1 | 175(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 100.0 |
| Tetracycline | ≥8 | ≥16 | ≤1–≥16 | 163(93.2) | 2(1.1) | 10(5.7) | 94.3 |
| Levofloxacin | ≤2 | ≤2 | ≤0.5–≤2 | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 175(100.0) | 0.0 |
| Chloromycetin | ≤4 | 4 | ≤2–≥32 | 8(4.6) | 0(0.0) | 167(95.4) | 4.6 |
| Vancomycin | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 175(100.0) | 0.0 |
Figure 1The serotype distribution of the S.pneumoniae isolates.
Note: Given to 3 co-colonization isolates, the denominator of PCV coverage rate and serotype proportions was 178. NT indicated non-typed serotypes.
Figure 2Population snapshot of 174 S.pneumoniae isolates.
One spot represents a single ST. The size of the circle corresponds to the number of isolates belonging to a ST. The lines indicate the presence of single locus variant (SLV) links among particular STs. Blue spots indicate the founder of a clonal complex.
The antimicrobial susceptibility and MIC s of β-lactams antibiotics between international antibiotic-resistant clones and other strains.
| Clones | No. | Penicillin G | Cefotaxime | Amoxicillin | |||
| MIC50/90 (μg/ml) | No. of non-S (%) | MIC50/90 (μg/ml) | No. of non-S (%) | MIC50/90 (μg/ml) | No. of non-S (%) | ||
| Taiwan19F-14 | 79 | 4/≥8 | 48(60.8) | 2/>4 | 58(73.4) | 4/≥8 | 60(75.9) |
| Spain23F-1 | 25 | 2/4 | 6(24.0) | 1/2 | 11(44.0) | ≤2/4 | 2(8.0) |
| Taiwan23F-15 | 7 | 2/≥8 | 2(28.6) | 2/2 | 4(57.1) | ≤2/4 | 1(14.3) |
| Spain6B-2 | 7 | 2/4 | 3(42.9) | 2/4 | 4(57.1) | ≤2/4 | 2(28.6) |
| Clones | 118 | 4/≥8 | 59(50.0) | 2/>4 | 77(65.3) | 4/≥8 | 65(55.1) |
| Other isolates | 56 | 2/4 | 10(17.9) | 1/4 | 19(33.9) | ≤2/4 | 9(16.1) |
Note:
Clones represented the four international antibiotic-resistant clones including Taiwan19F-14, Spain23F-1, Taiwan23F-15 and Spain6B-2.
The distribution of macrolide-resistant genes among 175 S.pneumoniae isolates in different clones.
| Macrolide-resistant genes | No. (%) | Clones | |||||
|
|
| Taiwan19F-14 | Spain23F-1 | Taiwan23F-15 | Spain6B-2 | Other isolates | |
| + | + | 110(62.9) | 78(98.7) | 8(32.0) | 3(42.9) | 1(14.3) | 20(35.1) |
| + | - | 65(37.1) | 1(1.3) | 17(68.0) | 4(57.1) | 6(85.7) | 37(64.9) |
Note:
The one isolates without ST number was grouped into other isolates.