Robert L Coleman1, James Moon2, Anil K Sood3, Wei Hu3, James E Delmore4, Albert J Bonebrake5, Garnet L Anderson6, Setsuko K Chambers7, Maurie Markman8. 1. University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: rcoleman@mdanderson.org. 2. SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Wichita CCOP/Associates in Women's Health, Wichita, KS, USA. 5. Cancer Research for the Ozarks-Cox Health, Springfield, MO, USA. 6. SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA. 8. Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Zion, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vandetanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/3, EGFR and RET, which has demonstrated clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with taxanes. We explored the efficacy, safety and toxicity of docetaxel and vandetanib in women with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Women with refractory or progressive OC were randomised 1:1 to docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), IV)+vandetanib (100mg daily, PO, D+V) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), D). Up to three additional cytotoxic regimens for recurrence and prior anti-angiogenic agents (as primary therapy) were allowed. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS). The study had 84% power to detect a PFS hazard ratio of 0.65, using a one-sided P of 0.1. This corresponds to an increase in median PFS from 3.6 months to 5.6 months. Patients progressing on D were allowed to receive single agent vandetanib (D → V). RESULTS: 131 Patients were enrolled; two were excluded. 16% had received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. The median PFS estimates were 3.0 mos (D+V) versus 3.5 (D); HR: 0.99 (80% CI: 0.79-1.26). 61 Patients on D+V were assessable for toxicity; 20(33%) had treatment-related Grade (G) 4 events, primarily haematologic. Similarly, 17 (27%) of 64 patients receiving D had G4 events, primarily haematologic. 27 Evaluable patients crossed-over to V. 1/27(4%) experienced a G4 event. G3 diarrhoea was observed in 4% D → V patients. Median OS was 14 mos (D+V) versus 18 mos (D → V); HR(OS): 1.25 (80% CI: 0.93-1.68). Crossover vandetanib response was 4% (1/27 evaluable patients). High plasma IL-8 levels were associated with response to D+V. CONCLUSIONS: Combination docetaxel+vandetanib did not prolong PFS relative to docetaxel alone in OC patients. No unexpected safety issues were identified.
BACKGROUND: Vandetanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/3, EGFR and RET, which has demonstrated clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with taxanes. We explored the efficacy, safety and toxicity of docetaxel and vandetanib in women with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Women with refractory or progressive OC were randomised 1:1 to docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), IV)+vandetanib (100mg daily, PO, D+V) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), D). Up to three additional cytotoxic regimens for recurrence and prior anti-angiogenic agents (as primary therapy) were allowed. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS). The study had 84% power to detect a PFS hazard ratio of 0.65, using a one-sided P of 0.1. This corresponds to an increase in median PFS from 3.6 months to 5.6 months. Patients progressing on D were allowed to receive single agent vandetanib (D → V). RESULTS: 131 Patients were enrolled; two were excluded. 16% had received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. The median PFS estimates were 3.0 mos (D+V) versus 3.5 (D); HR: 0.99 (80% CI: 0.79-1.26). 61 Patients on D+V were assessable for toxicity; 20(33%) had treatment-related Grade (G) 4 events, primarily haematologic. Similarly, 17 (27%) of 64 patients receiving D had G4 events, primarily haematologic. 27 Evaluable patients crossed-over to V. 1/27(4%) experienced a G4 event. G3 diarrhoea was observed in 4% D → V patients. Median OS was 14 mos (D+V) versus 18 mos (D → V); HR(OS): 1.25 (80% CI: 0.93-1.68). Crossover vandetanib response was 4% (1/27 evaluable patients). High plasma IL-8 levels were associated with response to D+V. CONCLUSIONS: Combination docetaxel+vandetanib did not prolong PFS relative to docetaxel alone in OC patients. No unexpected safety issues were identified.
Authors: A Viloria-Petit; T Crombet; S Jothy; D Hicklin; P Bohlen; J M Schlaeppi; J Rak; R S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Timothy J Perren; Ann Marie Swart; Jacobus Pfisterer; Jonathan A Ledermann; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Gunnar Kristensen; Mark S Carey; Philip Beale; Andrés Cervantes; Christian Kurzeder; Andreas du Bois; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Anne Stähle; Fiona Collinson; Sharadah Essapen; Charlie Gourley; Alain Lortholary; Frédéric Selle; Mansoor R Mirza; Arto Leminen; Marie Plante; Dan Stark; Wendi Qian; Mahesh K B Parmar; Amit M Oza Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert A Burger; Mark F Brady; Michael A Bookman; Gini F Fleming; Bradley J Monk; Helen Huang; Robert S Mannel; Howard D Homesley; Jeffrey Fowler; Benjamin E Greer; Matthew Boente; Michael J Birrer; Sharon X Liang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brian C Cooper; Justine M Ritchie; Carrie L W Broghammer; Jeremy Coffin; Joel I Sorosky; Richard E Buller; Mary J C Hendrix; Anil K Sood Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Philipp Harter; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Jörn Rau; Felix Hilpert; Christian Kurzeder; Gabriele Elser; Andreas du Bois Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Christina M Annunziata; Amanda J Walker; Lori Minasian; Minshu Yu; Herbert Kotz; Bradford J Wood; Katherine Calvo; Peter Choyke; Daniel Kimm; Seth M Steinberg; Elise C Kohn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrew M Arnold; Lesley Seymour; Michael Smylie; Keyue Ding; Yee Ung; Brian Findlay; Christopher W Lee; Marina Djurfeldt; Marlo Whitehead; Peter Ellis; Glenwood Goss; Adrien Chan; Jacinta Meharchand; Yasmin Alam; Richard Gregg; Charles Butts; Peter Langmuir; Frances Shepherd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Philipp Harter; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Jörn Rau; Felix Hilpert; Christian Kurzeder; Gabriele Elser; Andreas du Bois Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Jo Morrison; Clemens Thoma; Richard J Goodall; Thomas J Lyons; Kezia Gaitskell; Alison J Wiggans; Andrew Bryant Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-16