Literature DB >> 24709170

Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients.

Wei Geng1, Xianghua Fu2, Xinshun Gu1, Yunfa Jiang1, Weize Fan1, Yanbo Wang1, Wei Li1, Kun Xing1, Chen Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transradial approach catheterization is now widely used in coronary angiography and angioplasty. The ulnar artery, which is one of the two terminal branches of the brachial artery, may be a potential approach for cardiac catheterization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a transulnar approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients.
METHODS: A total of 535 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to transulnar approach (TUA) group (n = 271) or transradial approach (TRA) group (n = 264) upon arrival at the catheterization laboratory. Allen's test and inverse Allen's test were not routinely performed. Ultrasound-Doppler assessment of the forearm artery was performed before the procedure, two days after the procedure, and 30 days after the procedure. The primary endpoints of study were the rate of successful artery cannulation and the access-site related complications. The secondary endpoints included the number of needle punctures, total time for the procedure, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
RESULTS: Successful puncture of the objective artery was obtained in 91.5% of the patients in the TUA group, and 95.1% of the patients in the TRA group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in hematoma complications between the two groups (7.7% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.100). A motor abnormality of the hand was observed in one patient in the TUA group. There were no arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm observed in our study. Three (1.1%) patients in the TUA group and 8 (3.0%) patients in the TRA group had occlusion of the access artery (P = 0.137), but none of the patients had symptoms or signs of hand ischemia. There were no significant differences in MACE between the two groups during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The transulnar approach is an effective and safe technique for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24709170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  Development of local clinical practice guidelines in the real world: an evolving scene in China.

Authors:  Joey Sw Kwong; Xin Sun
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 2.  Distal Radial and Ulnar Arteries: the Alternative Forearm Access.

Authors:  Analkumar Parikh; Kelly Q Jia; Sumeet K Lall; Ravi S Shah; Ian C Gilchrist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 3.  Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  George Hahalis; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Gregory Tsigkas; Periklis Davlouros; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Ioanna Koniari; Marianna Leopoulou; Olivier Costerousse; Dimitris Tousoulis; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: Contemporary Insights and Novel Approaches.

Authors:  Renato Francesco Maria Scalise; Armando Mariano Salito; Alberto Polimeni; Victoria Garcia-Ruiz; Vittorio Virga; Pierpaolo Frigione; Giuseppe Andò; Carlo Tumscitz; Francesco Costa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Impact of the Use of a Larger Forearm Artery on the Efficacy and Safety of Transradial and Transulnar Access: A Randomized Trial with Preprocedural Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Pawel Lewandowski; Anna Zuk; Tomasz Slomski; Pawel Maciejewski; Bogumil Ramotowski; Andrzej Budaj
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome - RAUL study.

Authors:  Dagmara Gralak-Lachowska; Paweł J Lewandowski; Pawel Maciejewski; Bogumił Ramotowski; Andrzej Budaj; Sebastian Stec
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.