Literature DB >> 24709056

Evaluation of a Teleform-based data collection system: a multi-center obesity research case study.

Todd M Jenkins1, Tawny Wilson Boyce2, Rachel Akers3, Jennifer Andringa4, Yanhong Liu5, Rosemary Miller6, Carolyn Powers7, C Ralph Buncher8.   

Abstract

Utilizing electronic data capture (EDC) systems in data collection and management allows automated validation programs to preemptively identify and correct data errors. For our multi-center, prospective study we chose to use TeleForm, a paper-based data capture software that uses recognition technology to create case report forms (CRFs) with similar functionality to EDC, including custom scripts to identify entry errors. We quantified the accuracy of the optimized system through a data audit of CRFs and the study database, examining selected critical variables for all subjects in the study, as well as an audit of all variables for 25 randomly selected subjects. Overall we found 6.7 errors per 10,000 fields, with similar estimates for critical (6.9/10,000) and non-critical (6.5/10,000) variables-values that fall below the acceptable quality threshold of 50 errors per 10,000 established by the Society for Clinical Data Management. However, error rates were found to widely vary by type of data field, with the highest rate observed with open text fields.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data collection; Data quality; Technology; Teleform; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24709056      PMCID: PMC5079618          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of a computer-assisted data entry procedure (including Teleform) for large-scale mailed surveys.

Authors:  Clare Jinks; Kelvin Jordan; Peter Croft
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Evaluation of a data collection tool (TELEform) for palliative care research.

Authors:  K Hue Quan; Antonio Vigano; Robin L Fainsinger
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Data collection in a multisite project: Teleform.

Authors:  J Michael Hardin; Lesa L Woodby; Myra A Crawford; Richard A Windsor; Thomas M Miller
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.462

4.  Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery: methodological features of the first prospective multicenter study of adolescent bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Thomas H Inge; Meg Zeller; Carroll Harmon; Michael Helmrath; Judy Bean; Avani Modi; Mary Horlick; Maninder Kalra; Stavra Xanthakos; Rosemary Miller; Rachel Akers; Anita Courcoulas
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Reducing errors from the electronic transcription of data collected on paper forms: a research data case study.

Authors:  Monika M Wahi; David V Parks; Robert C Skeate; Steven B Goldin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: costs simulation study.

Authors:  Ivan Pavlović; Tomaz Kern; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Validation of automated forms processing. A comparison of Teleform with manual data entry.

Authors:  C K Jørgensen; B Karlsmose
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  A patient-completed and optically read data acquisition system for clinical trials.

Authors:  Hue Quan; Patricia D Biondo; Carla Stiles; Dwight E Moulin; Neil A Hagen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture.

Authors:  Meredith L Nahm; Carl F Pieper; Maureen M Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  A new method of mark detection for software-based optical mark recognition.

Authors:  Seng Cheong Loke; Khairul A Kasmiran; Sharifah A Haron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Data entry quality of double data entry vs automated form processing technologies: A cohort study validation of optical mark recognition and intelligent character recognition in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Aksel Paulsen; Knut Harboe; Ingvild Dalen
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-29

3.  Protocol for establishing an infant feeding database linkable with population-based administrative data: a prospective cohort study in Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Nathan Christopher Nickel; Lynne Warda; Leslie Kummer; Joanne Chateau; Maureen Heaman; Chris Green; Alan Katz; Julia Paul; Carolyn Perchuk; Darlene Girard; Lorraine Larocque; Jennifer Emily Enns; Souradet Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Electronic data capture for large scale typhoid surveillance, household contact tracing, and health utilisation survey: Strategic Typhoid Alliance across Africa and Asia.

Authors:  Deus Thindwa; Yama G Farooq; Mila Shakya; Nirod Saha; Susan Tonks; Yaw Anokwa; Melita A Gordon; Carl Hartung; James E Meiring; Andrew J Pollard; Robert S Heyderman
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-04-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.