Anastasia Topalidou1, George Tzagarakis2, Xenia Souvatzis3, George Kontakis2, Pavlos Katonis2. 1. University of Crete - Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Heraklion. Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation. 2. University of Crete - Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Heraklion. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: For the evaluation of the functionality and mobility of the spine, several methods have been developed. The purpose of this study was to estimate the test-retest reliability of the Spinal Mouse, a new, non-invasive, computer-assisted wireless telemetry device for the assessment of the curvatures, the mobility and the functionality of the spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 adults with back or low back pain. Twenty four parameters were studied in the sagittal and frontal plane. For the characterization of the precision, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement were used. RESULTS: in the sagittal plane, 22 of the 24 parameters showed high and good reliability, while only two fair and poor. In the frontal plane, 17 parameters showed high and good reliability, five fair and two poor. DISCUSSION: the Spinal Mouse showed excellent test-retest reliability in the sagittal plane, while a slightly inferior performance in the frontal plane, for the evaluation of curvatures, deformation and mobility of the spine.
UNLABELLED: For the evaluation of the functionality and mobility of the spine, several methods have been developed. The purpose of this study was to estimate the test-retest reliability of the Spinal Mouse, a new, non-invasive, computer-assisted wireless telemetry device for the assessment of the curvatures, the mobility and the functionality of the spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 adults with back or low back pain. Twenty four parameters were studied in the sagittal and frontal plane. For the characterization of the precision, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement were used. RESULTS: in the sagittal plane, 22 of the 24 parameters showed high and good reliability, while only two fair and poor. In the frontal plane, 17 parameters showed high and good reliability, five fair and two poor. DISCUSSION: the Spinal Mouse showed excellent test-retest reliability in the sagittal plane, while a slightly inferior performance in the frontal plane, for the evaluation of curvatures, deformation and mobility of the spine.
Authors: Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2018-01-10
Authors: Éva Anett Csuhai; Attila Csaba Nagy; Zsuzsanna Váradi; Ilona Veres-Balajti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal; Patricia Molina-Castillo; Pedro A López-Miñarro; Mario Albaladejo-Saura; Francisco Esparza-Ros Journal: PeerJ Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Karolina Walewicz; Jakub Taradaj; Maciej Dobrzyński; Mirosław Sopel; Mateusz Kowal; Kuba Ptaszkowski; Robert Dymarek Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.241