| Literature DB >> 24707475 |
Lars L Andersen1, Christoffer H Andersen1, Jørgen H Skotte1, Charlotte Suetta2, Karen Søgaard3, Bengt Saltin4, Gisela Sjøgaard3.
Abstract
AIM: This study investigates consequences of chronic neck pain on muscle function and the rehabilitating effects of contrasting interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24707475 PMCID: PMC3953472 DOI: 10.1155/2014/187324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Illustration of experimental setup, the square wave signal (green tracing), and a typical force signal (white tracing) in the beginning (left) and during the end (right) of the 100 consecutive contractions.
Figure 2Case-control (left) and intervention (right) results of peak force (top), rate of force development (RFD) (mid), and rate of force relaxation (RFR) (bottom). *Significant group effect; P < 0.001 and P < 0.01.
Figure 3Case-control (left) and intervention (right) results of peak EMG (top), integrated EMG during the rising phase of contraction (mid), and resting EMG (bottom). *Significant group effect; P < 0.001 and P < 0.01.
Figure 4Case-control (left) and intervention (right) results of median power frequency (MPF) of the EMG signal.
Muscle fiber cross-sectional area, fiber type percentage, capillaries per fiber (CAF), and capillaries per fiber area (CAFA) in healthy controls (CON) and women with trapezius myalgia (MYA) at baseline and before and after 10-week intervention in the specific strength training (SST), general fitness training (GFT), and reference (REF) groups.
| Area ( | Fiber type percentage (%) | Capillaries per fiber (CAF) | Capillaries per fiber area (CAFA) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Type II | Type I | Type II | Type I | Type II | Type I | Type II | |
| CON | 5057 ± 1120 | 4000 ± 1104 | 67 ± 11 | 33 ± 11 | 4.23 ± 0.74 | 3.15 ± 0.72 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.84 ± 0.17 |
| MYA | 5193 ± 1110 | 3501 ± 977 | 69 ± 11 | 31 ± 11 | 4.12 ± 0.87 | 2.79 ± 0.70 | 0.83 ± 0.14 | 0.86 ± 0.20 |
| REF | ||||||||
| Before | 4941 ± 399 | 3334 ± 489 | 66 ± 13 | 34 ± 13 | 3.72 ± 0.49 | 2.41 ± 0.33 | 0.81 ± 0.14 | 0.78 ± 0.14 |
| After | 5299 ± 1134 | 3471 ± 684 | 66 ± 14 | 34 ± 14 | 3.97 ± 0.53 | 2.60 ± 0.61 | 0.83 ± 0.18 | 0.78 ± 0.16 |
| GFT | ||||||||
| Before | 5555 ± 1201 | 3794 ± 796 | 69 ± 11 | 31 ± 11 | 4.39 ± 0.80 | 3.10 ± 0.51 | 0.85 ± 0.19 | 0.89 ± 0.25 |
| After | 5108 ± 1030 | 3612 ± 1070 | 72 ± 11 | 28 ± 11 | 4.18 ± 0.43 | 2.93 ± 0.57 | 0.85 ± 0.15 | 0.87 ± 0.34 |
| SST | ||||||||
| Before | 5043 ± 1294 | 3439 ± 1331 | 69 ± 12 | 31 ± 12 | 4.15 ± 1.09 | 2.80 ± 0.95 | 0.85 ± 0.13 | 0.88 ± 0.22 |
| After | 5516 ± 1188# | 4133 ± 1145$ | 70 ± 10 | 31 ± 10 | 4.53 ± 0.82# | 3.31 ± 0.64$ | 0.88 ± 0.13 | 0.85 ± 0.17 |
#Tendency for increase from baseline to follow-up in SST, P < 0.10.
$Significant increase from baseline to follow-up in SST, P < 0.05.