| Literature DB >> 24707405 |
Zahra Hesami1, Akram Jamshidzadeh2, Maryam Ayatollahi3, Bita Geramizadeh3, Omid Farshad4, Akbar Vahdati1.
Abstract
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been of great concern to the scientists and doctors who are involved in wound healing and regenerative medicine which focuses on repairing and replacing damaged cells and tissues. Growth factors of platelet-rich plasma are cost-effective, available, and is more stable than recombinant human growth factors. Given these valuable properties, we decided to assess the effect of PRP on CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity on rats. The rats received CCl4 (1 mL/kg, i.p. 1 : 1 in olive oil) twice per week for 8 weeks. Five weeks after CCl4 injection, the rats also received PRP (0.5 mL/kg, s.c.) two days a week for three weeks. Twenty-four hours after last CCl4 injection, the animals bled and their livers dissected for biochemical and histopathological studies. Blood analysis was performed to evaluate enzyme activity. The results showed that PRP itself was not toxic for liver and could protect the liver from CCl4-induced histological damages and attenuated oxidative stress by increase in glutathione content and decrease in lipid peroxidative marker of liver tissue. The results of the present study lend support to our beliefs in hepatoprotective effects of PRP.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24707405 PMCID: PMC3953414 DOI: 10.1155/2014/932930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hepatol
Figure 1Effect of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on histopathological changes induced by CCl4 in rats. (a) (H&E ×100) liver section of normal rats showing normal hepatocytes with prominent nucleus, cytoplasm, and central vein; (b) (H&E ×250) liver sections of CCl4-treated (0.5 mL/kg i.p.) rats showing fatty chain, necrosis, and infiltration of inflammatory cells; (c) (H&E ×250) liver sections of the rats treated with PRP (0.5 mL/kg s.c.) showing well-brought out central vein hepatocytes with well-preserved cytoplasm and normal hepatocytes with prominent nucleus; (d) (H&E ×250) liver sections of the rats treated with CCl4 + PRP (0.5 mL/kg + 0.5 mL/kg s.c.) showing normal architecture of hepatocytes and mild infiltration of inflammatory cells. H: hepatocyte, CV: central vein, N: nucleus, F: foamy macrophage cells, FC: fatty chain, NC: necrosis, I: infiltration of inflammatory cells, and BD: ballooning degeneration.
Effect of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on histopathological liver damages induced by CCl4 in rats.
| Groups | Ballooning Degeneration | Fatty change | Hepatocyte necrosis | Inflammation | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| CCl4 | ++ | + | +++ | + | Many foamy macrophages and old necrosis |
| PRP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| PRP + CCl4 | 0 | 0 | + | + | — |
0: absent; +: mild; ++: moderate; +++: severe.
Rats were injected (i.p.) CCL4 with doses (0.5 mL/kg 1 : 1 in olive oil) twice per week for 8 weeks. Five weeks after CCl4 injection, rats received PRP (0.5 mL/kg 1 : 1 in PBS, s.c.). The PRP (0.5 mL/kg 1 : 1 in PBS, s.c.) alone did not increase the levels of the enzymes. Values are mean ± SD of 6 rats per group.
Figure 2Effect of platelet rich plasma (PRP) on rat hepatic enzymes and albumin levels changed by CCl4. (a) ALT, (b) AST, (c) albumin. Rats were injected CCL4 with doses (0.5 mL/kg i.p. 1 : 1 in olive oil) twice per week for 8 weeks. Five weeks after CCl4 injection rats received PRP (0.5 mL/kg s.c.) 2 days a week for 3 weeks. Values are mean ± SD of 6 rats per group. *Significantly different from CCl4-treated group (P ≤ 0.05). **Significantly different from CCl4-treated group (P ≤ 0.01).
Effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on GSH and TBARs levels of the liver damaged by CCl4 in rats.
| Groups | GSH (nmol/g liver) | TBARs (nmol/g liver) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.35454 ± 0.035* | 0.7 ± 0.057** |
| CCL4 (0.5 mL/kg) | 0.18727 ± 0.016 | 4.96 ± 0.84 |
| PRP (0.5 mL/kg) | 0.33187 ± 0.058* | 0.962 ± 0.23** |
| CCL4 + PRP | 0.28774 ± 0.034* | 0.981 ± 0.035** |
GSH: reduced glutathione; TBARs: thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances.
Values are mean ± SD, (n = 6).
*P ≤ 0.05 mean difference, compared to CCl4-treated rats.
**P ≤ 0.001 mean difference, compared to CCl4-treated rats.