Literature DB >> 24706844

Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome.

Pia Unverdorben1, Florian Beck, Paweł Śledź, Andreas Schweitzer, Günter Pfeifer, Jürgen M Plitzko, Wolfgang Baumeister, Friedrich Förster.   

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is a 2.5 MDa molecular machine that executes the degradation of substrates of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. The molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome was recently established by cryo-EM approaches. For a detailed understanding of the sequence of events from the initial binding of polyubiquitylated substrates to the translocation into the proteolytic core complex, it is necessary to move beyond static structures and characterize the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. To this end we have subjected a large cryo-EM dataset acquired in the presence of ATP and ATP-γS to a deep classification procedure, which deconvolutes coexisting conformational states. Highly variable regions, such as the density assigned to the largest subunit, Rpn1, are now well resolved and rendered interpretable. Our analysis reveals the existence of three major conformations: in addition to the previously described ATP-hydrolyzing (ATPh) and ATP-γS conformations, an intermediate state has been found. Its AAA-ATPase module adopts essentially the same topology that is observed in the ATPh conformation, whereas the lid is more similar to the ATP-γS bound state. Based on the conformational ensemble of the 26S proteasome in solution, we propose a mechanistic model for substrate recognition, commitment, deubiquitylation, and translocation into the core particle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conformational switching; proteolysis; proteostasis; quality control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706844      PMCID: PMC3992697          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403409111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera.

Authors:  Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 2.  A method of focused classification, based on the bootstrap 3D variance analysis, and its application to EF-G-dependent translocation.

Authors:  Pawel A Penczek; Joachim Frank; Christian M T Spahn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Image processing for electron microscopy single-particle analysis using XMIPP.

Authors:  Sjors H W Scheres; Rafael Núñez-Ramírez; Carlos O S Sorzano; José María Carazo; Roberto Marabini
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Structural basis for specific cleavage of Lys 63-linked polyubiquitin chains.

Authors:  Yusuke Sato; Azusa Yoshikawa; Atsushi Yamagata; Hisatoshi Mimura; Masami Yamashita; Kayoko Ookata; Osamu Nureki; Kazuhiro Iwai; Masayuki Komada; Shuya Fukai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Leonardo G Trabuco; Elizabeth Villa; Kakoli Mitra; Joachim Frank; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution.

Authors:  M Groll; L Ditzel; J Löwe; D Stock; M Bochtler; H D Bartunik; R Huber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution.

Authors:  J Löwe; D Stock; B Jap; P Zwickl; W Baumeister; R Huber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Min Hu; Geng Tian; Ping Zhang; Daniel Finley; Philip D Jeffrey; Yigong Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes.

Authors:  Sumit Prakash; Tomonao Inobe; Ace Joseph Hatch; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 10.  The proteasome: overview of structure and functions.

Authors:  Keiji Tanaka
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.493

View more
  96 in total

1.  A timer to coordinate substrate processing by the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  Tingting Yao
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Rpn1 provides adjacent receptor sites for substrate binding and deubiquitination by the proteasome.

Authors:  Yuan Shi; Xiang Chen; Suzanne Elsasser; Bradley B Stocks; Geng Tian; Byung-Hoon Lee; Yanhong Shi; Naixia Zhang; Stefanie A H de Poot; Fabian Tuebing; Shuangwu Sun; Jacob Vannoy; Sergey G Tarasov; John R Engen; Daniel Finley; Kylie J Walters
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Refining the nuclear auxin response pathway through structural biology.

Authors:  David A Korasick; Joseph M Jez; Lucia C Strader
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Structural characterization of the interaction of Ubp6 with the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  Antje Aufderheide; Florian Beck; Florian Stengel; Michaela Hartwig; Andreas Schweitzer; Günter Pfeifer; Alfred L Goldberg; Eri Sakata; Wolfgang Baumeister; Friedrich Förster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ubiquitin-dependent switch during assembly of the proteasomal ATPases mediated by Not4 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Xinyi Fu; Vladyslava Sokolova; Kristofor J Webb; William Old; Soyeon Park
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  High-resolution cryo-EM structure of the proteasome in complex with ADP-AlFx.

Authors:  Zhanyu Ding; Zhenglin Fu; Cong Xu; Yifan Wang; Yanxing Wang; Junrui Li; Liangliang Kong; Jinhuan Chen; Na Li; Rongguang Zhang; Yao Cong
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Ubiquitinated proteins promote the association of proteasomes with the deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14 and the ubiquitin ligase Ube3c.

Authors:  Chueh-Ling Kuo; Alfred Lewis Goldberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure and energetics of pairwise interactions between proteasome subunits RPN2, RPN13, and ubiquitin clarify a substrate recruitment mechanism.

Authors:  Ryan T VanderLinden; Casey W Hemmis; Tingting Yao; Howard Robinson; Christopher P Hill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Structural insights into the functional cycle of the ATPase module of the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  Marc Wehmer; Till Rudack; Florian Beck; Antje Aufderheide; Günter Pfeifer; Jürgen M Plitzko; Friedrich Förster; Klaus Schulten; Wolfgang Baumeister; Eri Sakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Nucleotide-dependent switch in proteasome assembly mediated by the Nas6 chaperone.

Authors:  Frances Li; Geng Tian; Deanna Langager; Vladyslava Sokolova; Daniel Finley; Soyeon Park
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.