Literature DB >> 24706544

Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.

David Jeffrey Canty1, Jenny A Hayes, David Andrew Story, Colin Forbes Royse.   

Abstract

Ultrasound simulation allows students to virtually explore internal anatomy by producing accurate, moving, color, three-dimensional rendered slices from any angle or approach leaving the organs and their relationships intact without requirement for consumables. The aim was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of self-directed learning of cardiac anatomy with an ultrasound simulator compared to cadavers and plastic models. After a single cardiac anatomy lecture, fifty university anatomy students participated in a three-hour supervised self-directed learning exposure in groups of five, randomized to an ultrasound simulator or human cadaveric specimens and plastic models. Pre- and post-tests were conducted using pictorial and non-pictorial multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Simulator students completed a survey on their experience. Four simulator and seven cadaver group students did not attend after randomization. Simulator use in groups of five students was feasible and feedback from participants was very positive. Baseline test scores were similar (P = 0.9) between groups. After the learning intervention, there was no difference between groups in change in total test score (P = 0.37), whether they were pictorial (P = 0.6) or non-pictorial (P = 0.21). In both groups there was an increase in total test scores (simulator +19.8 ±12.4%% and cadaver: +16.4% ± 10.2, P < 0.0001), pictorial question scores (+22.9 ±18.0%, 19.7 ±19.3%, P < 0.001) and non-pictorial question scores (+16.7 ±18.2%, +13 ±15.4%, P = 0.002). The ultrasound simulator appears equivalent to human cadaveric prosections for learning cardiac anatomy.
© 2014 American Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy teaching; cardiac anatomy; cardiovascular anatomy; computer aided learning; gross anatomy education; medical education; simulation; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706544     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  5 in total

1.  Web-based teaching video packages on anatomical education.

Authors:  Mehmet Asim Ozer; Figen Govsa; Ayse Hilal Bati
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Ultrasound in Medical Education: Can Students Teach Themselves?

Authors:  Brandon Cowan; Abigail Brackney; Mallikarjuna Barremkala
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-08-04

Review 3.  Ultrasonography in undergraduate medical education: a comprehensive review and the education program implemented at Jichi Medical University.

Authors:  Toru Kameda; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Kei Konno; Harumi Koibuchi; Kiyoka Omoto; Kouichi Itoh
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Does ultrasound education improve anatomy learning? Effects of the Parallel Ultrasound Hands-on (PUSH) undergraduate medicine course.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Chen; Yi-No Kang; Ting-Cheng Wang; Che-Wei Lin; Chung-Yi Cheng; Fat-Moon Suk; Chin-Wang Hsu; Sha-Ku Huang; Wen-Cheng Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  The Role of Technology in Anatomy Teaching: Striking the Right Balance.

Authors:  Alexander Zargaran; Mohammed Adil Turki; Jared Bhaskar; Harry Victor Michael Spiers; David Zargaran
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-03-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.