PURPOSE: Little population-based research has been done on social, economic, and environmental factors affecting quality of life (QOL) among long-term cancer survivors. This research assesses the impact of disease and nondisease factors on QOL among long-term survivors of cervical cancer. METHODS: In a collaborative, observational study, data were obtained from cancer registries, interviews, and self-administered questionnaires. Comparisons of QOL were made between women with cervical cancer histories and women from the general population. A total of 715 women 4-28 years postdiagnosis were identified from cancer registries in Connecticut (N = 208), Detroit Metropolitan Area (N = 211), New Mexico (N = 197), and Hawaii (N = 99). QOL was measured according to four SF-36 dimensions-physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and general health status. RESULTS: Means on SF-36 measures among women with cervical cancer histories were close to or higher than women in the general population. In a multiple regression analysis, economic disadvantage negatively predicted physical functioning (B = -13.4, SE = 2.1), social functioning (B = -13.2, SE = 2.4), bodily pain (B = -12.6, SE = 2.5), and general health (B = -12.8, SE = 2.1). Residence in New Mexico negatively predicted several QOL dimensions. No impact of race was detected when income was controlled. Disease stage did not predict QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer does not generally reduce QOL among long-term survivors. Economic disadvantage and residential location affect QOL through mechanisms yet to be determined. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Women diagnosed with cervical cancer have good prospects for high quality of life; socioeconomic status strongly affects quality of life over the long term.
PURPOSE: Little population-based research has been done on social, economic, and environmental factors affecting quality of life (QOL) among long-term cancer survivors. This research assesses the impact of disease and nondisease factors on QOL among long-term survivors of cervical cancer. METHODS: In a collaborative, observational study, data were obtained from cancer registries, interviews, and self-administered questionnaires. Comparisons of QOL were made between women with cervical cancer histories and women from the general population. A total of 715 women 4-28 years postdiagnosis were identified from cancer registries in Connecticut (N = 208), Detroit Metropolitan Area (N = 211), New Mexico (N = 197), and Hawaii (N = 99). QOL was measured according to four SF-36 dimensions-physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and general health status. RESULTS: Means on SF-36 measures among women with cervical cancer histories were close to or higher than women in the general population. In a multiple regression analysis, economic disadvantage negatively predicted physical functioning (B = -13.4, SE = 2.1), social functioning (B = -13.2, SE = 2.4), bodily pain (B = -12.6, SE = 2.5), and general health (B = -12.8, SE = 2.1). Residence in New Mexico negatively predicted several QOL dimensions. No impact of race was detected when income was controlled. Disease stage did not predict QOL. CONCLUSIONS:Cervical cancer does not generally reduce QOL among long-term survivors. Economic disadvantage and residential location affect QOL through mechanisms yet to be determined. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Women diagnosed with cervical cancer have good prospects for high quality of life; socioeconomic status strongly affects quality of life over the long term.
Authors: Tim Luckett; David Goldstein; Phyllis N Butow; Val Gebski; Lynley J Aldridge; Joshua McGrane; Weng Ng; Madeleine T King Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Barbara D Powe; Jill Hamilton; Nichole Hancock; Natasha Johnson; Ramona Finnie; Jean Ko; Patrice Brooks; Maurice Boggan Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wayne A Bardwell; Loki Natarajan; Joel E Dimsdale; Cheryl L Rock; Joanne E Mortimer; Kathy Hollenbach; John P Pierce Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth A Medeiros; Sheila F Castañeda; Patricia Gonzalez; Bárbara Rodríguez; Christina Buelna; Demy West; Gregory A Talavera Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Diana S Hoover; Claire A Spears; Damon J Vidrine; Joan L Walker; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; David W Wetter Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2019-05-01