Literature DB >> 24706048

Optic nerve head drusen: a comparative study of 10 MHz and 20 MHz ultrasound probes.

Sonia Zaouali1, Nesrine Abroug, Sana Khochtali, Rim Kahloun, Bechir Jelliti, Sonia Attia, Salim Ben Yahia, Moncef Khairallah.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare 10-MHz and 20-MHz ultrasonography in the assessment of patients with optic nerve head drusen (ONHD). The design of the study was prospective, comparative and cross-sectional. Ultrasonographic examination with a 10 and 20 MHz probe was performed in 45 eyes with suspected ONHD. The 20 MHz probe showed drusen in 43 eyes (95.5 %), while the 10 MHz probe revealed drusen in only 33 eyes (73.3 %, p = 0.0001). The 10 MHz probe showed surface drusen in 10 eyes (22.2 %), while the 20 MHz probe showed surface drusen in 14 eyes (31.1 %) (sensitivity 71.4 %; 95 % CI [47.6-95.1 %]). The 10 MHz probe showed buried drusen in 23 eyes (23.1 %), while the 20 MHz probe showed buried drusen in 29 eyes (64.4 %) (sensitivity 79.3 %; 95 % CI [56.6-86.2 %]). The sensitivity was 76.7 % with 10 MHz probe compared to a 20 MHz as gold standard. The use of 20 MHz probe increased the sensitivity of buried disc drusen by 1.5 times and surface disc drusen by nearly 2 times. Using the 10 MHz probe alone the false negative error rate was 83.3 %. The 20 MHz probe has shown itself to be an excellent method for the diagnosis of ONHD; it is more sensitive and reliable than 10 MHz probe and should be considered in the management of patients with clinical evidence of ONHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706048     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-9939-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of imaging techniques for diagnosing drusen of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  M M Kurz-Levin; K Landau
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Echographic evaluation of optic disc drusen.

Authors:  H C Boldt; S F Byrne; C DiBernardo
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1991-06

3.  Multimodal imaging of optic disc drusen.

Authors:  Taku Sato; Sarah Mrejen; Richard F Spaide
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Imaging of optic disc drusen: a comparative study.

Authors:  S Kheterpal; P A Good; D J Beale; E E Kritzinger
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Drusen of the optic disc.

Authors:  A H Friedman; B Beckerman; D H Gold; J B Walsh; S Gartner
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Drusen of the optic disk. A clinical and genetic study.

Authors:  S E Lorentzen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1966

7.  Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of optic nerve head drusen.

Authors:  Kunal Y Merchant; Daniel Su; Sung Chul Park; Shehzad Qayum; Rudrani Banik; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Sonography in optic disk drusen: imaging findings and role in diagnosis when funduscopic findings are normal.

Authors:  M M McNicholas; W J Power; J F Griffin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Differentiating optic disc edema from optic nerve head drusen on optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Lenworth N Johnson; Meredith L Diehl; Chuck W Hamm; Drew N Sommerville; Gregory F Petroski
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01

Review 10.  Optic disk drusen.

Authors:  Claudia Auw-Haedrich; Flemming Staubach; Heinrich Witschel
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Optic Nerve Head Drusen: An Update.

Authors:  Edward Palmer; Jesse Gale; Jonathan G Crowston; Anthony P Wells
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.