Literature DB >> 24705791

Variability of landmark acquisition affects tunnel calculation in image-free ACL navigation.

Sven Shafizadeh1, Maurice Balke, Ulrich Hagn, Stefan Grote, Bertil Bouillon, Marc Banerjee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability of intraarticular landmark identification for tunnel position calculation in image-free anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) navigation.
METHODS: In a test/retest scenario, thirteen experienced ACL surgeons (>50 reconstructions year) experienced in image-free ACL navigation were asked to identify the landmarks required for image-free ACL navigation in the same cadaver knee. Landmark positions were registered using a fluoroscopic ACL navigation system. Positions were determined using validated radiological measurement methods. For variability analysis, mean positions, deviations between the test/retest positions, standard deviations (SD) and range were calculated.
RESULTS: Interobserver analysis showed a mean variability (SD) for the tibial landmark positions of 3.0 mm with deviations of up to 24.3 mm (range). Mean femoral landmark variability was 2.9 mm (SD) with deviations of up to 11.3 mm (range). Intraobserver analysis showed a tibial reproducibility of 2.2 mm (SD 2.0 mm; range 10.9 mm) and a femoral of 1.9 mm (SD 1.9 mm; range 10.4 mm).
CONCLUSION: The data of the presented study suggest that a considerable inter- and intraobserver variability in intraarticular landmark identification exists. Reasonable ranges were found that have to be considered as a potential risk for miscalculation of tunnel positions in image-free ACL reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Landmark acquisition affects tunnel calculation in image-free ACL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24705791     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2963-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Computer-navigated ACL reconstruction with the OrthoPilot.

Authors:  Markus Degenhart
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ganesh V Kamath; John C Redfern; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Intersurgeon variance in computer-assisted planning of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Niels W L Schep; Michel H J Stavenuiter; Carel H Diekerhof; Eric P Martens; Col Michiel van Haeff; Ivo A M J Broeders; Daniël B F Saris
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mitchel Robinson; Donald G Eckhoff; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Joel M Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Revision surgery in failed anterior cruciate ligament-plasty].

Authors:  G M Oettl; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  Sensitivity of insertion locations on length patterns of anterior cruciate ligament fibers.

Authors:  M S Hefzy; E S Grood
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Proceedings of the ESSKA Scientific Workshop on Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments.

Authors:  A A Amis; B Beynnon; L Blankevoort; P Chambat; P Christel; L Durselen; N Friederich; E Grood; P Hertel; R Jakob
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity.

Authors:  Sandra Martelli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Nicola Lopomo; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2007-05

10.  The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Khalfayan; P F Sharkey; A H Alexander; J D Bruckner; E B Bynum
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical advantages of image-free navigation system using surface-based registration in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Byung Hoon Lee; Dong Ho Kum; Im Joo Rhyu; Youngjun Kim; Hyunchul Cho; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Current use of navigation system in ACL surgery: a historical review.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; F Urrizola; C Signorelli; A Grassi; T Roberti Di Sarsina; G A Lucidi; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; T Bonanzinga; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Interbundle Impingement Pressure in Individualized and Nonindividualized Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Daqiang Liang; Lei Yang; Sheng Li; Zhihe Qiu; Qihuang Qin; Xinzhi Liang; Haifeng Liu; Kan Ouyang; Jianyi Xiong; Daping Wang; Wei Lu; Mingjin Zhong; Ying Li; Hao Li; Wenzhe Feng; Kang Chen; Liangquan Peng; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.