Literature DB >> 24705182

The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership.

Andreas Kalckert1, H Henrik Ehrsson2.   

Abstract

The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which a model hand is experienced as part of one's own body. In the present study we directly compared the classical illusion, based on visuotactile stimulation, with a rubber hand illusion based on active and passive movements. We examined the question of which combinations of sensory and motor cues are the most potent in inducing the illusion by subjective ratings and an objective measure (proprioceptive drift). In particular, we were interested in whether the combination of afferent and efferent signals in active movements results in the same illusion as in the purely passive modes. Our results show that the illusion is equally strong in all three cases. This demonstrates that different combinations of sensory input can lead to a very similar phenomenological experience and indicates that the illusion can be induced by any combination of multisensory information.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agency; Body perception; Motor control; Multisensory integration; Ownership; Rubber hand illusion; Self-recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24705182     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  86 in total

1.  The plausibility of visual information for hand ownership modulates multisensory synchrony perception.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Explicit and implicit measures of body ownership and agency: affected by the same manipulations and yet independent.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Jue Qu; Liping Yang; Wenwen Zhao; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Body ownership determines the attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations.

Authors:  Konstantina Kilteni; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How using brain-machine interfaces influences the human sense of agency.

Authors:  Emilie A Caspar; Albert De Beir; Gil Lauwers; Axel Cleeremans; Bram Vanderborght
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker; Richard J Wassersug; John W Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  The roles of consistency and exclusivity in perceiving body ownership and agency.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Bernhard Hommel; Hong Chen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-23

7.  Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand.

Authors:  G Tieri; E Tidoni; E F Pavone; S M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Body ownership and agency: task-dependent effects of the virtual hand illusion on proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Satoshi Unenaka; Yukari Ohki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Freedom to act enhances the sense of agency, while movement and goal-related prediction errors reduce it.

Authors:  Riccardo Villa; Emmanuele Tidoni; Giuseppina Porciello; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Sense of ownership and not the sense of agency is spatially bounded within the space reachable with the unaugmented hand.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Sarah A Cutts; Dorothy M Fragaszy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.