Randy P Auerbach1, Roee Admon, Diego A Pizzagalli. 1. From the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School; Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA.
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After participating in this educational activity, the physician should be better able to 1. Evaluate the relationship between reward processes, stress, and depression. 2. Assess the characteristics of the three etiological models of stress and reward processes. 3. Identify the biological basis for stress and reward processes. Adolescence is a peak period for the onset of depression, and it is also a time marked by substantial stress as well as neural development within the brain reward circuitry. In this review, we provide a selective overview of current animal and human research investigating the relationship among reward processes, stress, and depression. Three separate, but related, etiological models examine the differential roles that stress may play in relation to reward dysfunction and adolescent depression. First, the reward mediation model suggests that both acute and chronic stress contribute to reward deficits, which, in turn, potentiate depressive symptoms or increase the risk for depression. Second, in line with the stress generation perspective, it is plausible that premorbid reward-related dysfunction generates stress--in particular, interpersonal stress--which then leads to the manifestation of depressive symptoms. Third, consistent with a diathesis-stress model, the interaction between stress and premorbid reward dysfunction may contribute to the onset of depression. Given the equifinal nature of depression, these models could shed important light on different etiological pathways during adolescence, particularly as they may relate to understanding the heterogeneity of depression. To highlight the translational potential of these insights, a hypothetical case study is provided as a means of demonstrating the importance of targeting reward dysfunction in both assessment and treatment of adolescent depression.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After participating in this educational activity, the physician should be better able to 1. Evaluate the relationship between reward processes, stress, and depression. 2. Assess the characteristics of the three etiological models of stress and reward processes. 3. Identify the biological basis for stress and reward processes. Adolescence is a peak period for the onset of depression, and it is also a time marked by substantial stress as well as neural development within the brain reward circuitry. In this review, we provide a selective overview of current animal and human research investigating the relationship among reward processes, stress, and depression. Three separate, but related, etiological models examine the differential roles that stress may play in relation to reward dysfunction and adolescent depression. First, the reward mediation model suggests that both acute and chronic stress contribute to reward deficits, which, in turn, potentiate depressive symptoms or increase the risk for depression. Second, in line with the stress generation perspective, it is plausible that premorbid reward-related dysfunction generates stress--in particular, interpersonal stress--which then leads to the manifestation of depressive symptoms. Third, consistent with a diathesis-stress model, the interaction between stress and premorbid reward dysfunction may contribute to the onset of depression. Given the equifinal nature of depression, these models could shed important light on different etiological pathways during adolescence, particularly as they may relate to understanding the heterogeneity of depression. To highlight the translational potential of these insights, a hypothetical case study is provided as a means of demonstrating the importance of targeting reward dysfunction in both assessment and treatment of adolescent depression.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Rhoshel K Lenroot; Nitin Gogtay; Deanna K Greenstein; Elizabeth Molloy Wells; Gregory L Wallace; Liv S Clasen; Jonathan D Blumenthal; Jason Lerch; Alex P Zijdenbos; Alan C Evans; Paul M Thompson; Jay N Giedd Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-04-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: David E J Linden; Isabelle Habes; Stephen J Johnston; Stefanie Linden; Ranjit Tatineni; Leena Subramanian; Bettina Sorger; David Healy; Rainer Goebel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pablo Vidal-Ribas; Brenda Benson; Aria D Vitale; Hanna Keren; Anita Harrewijn; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2019-06-03
Authors: Allesandra S Iadipaolo; Hilary A Marusak; Kelsey Sala-Hamrick; Laura M Crespo; Moriah E Thomason; Christine A Rabinak Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Daniel M Mackin; Roman Kotov; Greg Perlman; Brady D Nelson; Brandon L Goldstein; Greg Hajcak; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2019-05
Authors: Olga Tymofiyeva; Colm G Connolly; Tiffany C Ho; Matthew D Sacchet; Eva Henje Blom; Kaja Z LeWinn; Duan Xu; Tony T Yang Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 4.839