Literature DB >> 24704662

A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions.

Sebastian P Suggate1.   

Abstract

Much is known about short-term--but very little about the long-term--effects of reading interventions. To rectify this, a detailed analysis of follow-up effects as a function of intervention, sample, and methodological variables was conducted. A total of 71 intervention-control groups were selected (N = 8,161 at posttest) from studies reporting posttest and follow-up data (M = 11.17 months) for previously established reading interventions. The posttest effect sizes indicated effects (dw = 0.37) that decreased to follow-up (dw = 0.22). Overall, comprehension and phonemic awareness interventions showed good maintenance of effect that transferred to nontargeted skills, whereas phonics and fluency interventions, and those for preschool and kindergarten children, tended not to. Several methodological features also related to effect sizes at follow-up, namely experimental design and dosage, and sample attrition, risk status, and gender balance. © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comprehension; decoding; fluency; long-term; phonemic awareness; phonics; reading intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704662     DOI: 10.1177/0022219414528540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  17 in total

1.  The Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Knowledge of Children with Poor Reading Comprehension despite Adequate Decoding: Evidence from a Regression-Based Matching Approach.

Authors:  Mercedes Spencer; Richard K Wagner; Yaacov Petscher
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 2.  Connections Between Reading Comprehension and Word-Problem Solving via Oral Language Comprehension: Implications for Comorbid Learning Disabilities.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Douglas Fuchs; Pamela M Seethaler; Laurie E Cutting; Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez
Journal:  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Beginning reading interventions for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Brian Reichow; Christopher J Lemons; Daniel M Maggin; David R Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education.

Authors:  Yaacov Petscher; Sonia Q Cabell; Hugh W Catts; Donald L Compton; Barbara R Foorman; Sara A Hart; Christopher J Lonigan; Beth M Phillips; Christopher Schatschneider; Laura M Steacy; Nicole Patton Terry; Richard K Wagner
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2020-09-06

Review 5.  Reading abilities in school-aged preterm children: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa N Kovachy; Jenna N Adams; John S Tamaresis; Heidi M Feldman
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  A Commentary on Bowers (2020) and the Role of Phonics Instruction in Reading.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Robert Savage; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-11-05

7.  The relationships between oral language and reading instruction: Evidence from a computational model of reading.

Authors:  Ya-Ning Chang; J S H Taylor; Kathleen Rastle; Padraic Monaghan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Meta-Analytic Findings on Reading in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Fatima Sibaii; Kejin Lee; Makayla J Gill; Jonathan L Hatch
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Promoting Foundation Reading Skills With At-Risk Students.

Authors:  Ana Sucena; Ana Filipa Silva; Cátia Marques
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Preschool morphological training produces long-term improvements in reading comprehension.

Authors:  Solveig-Alma Halaas Lyster; Arne Olav Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2016-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.