Eric R Sokol1, Mickey M Karram2, Roger Dmochowski3. 1. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 2. The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: roger.dmochowski@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Bulkamid® is a new polyacrylamide hydrogel bulking agent for stress urinary incontinence that is injected in the urethral submucosa using a specifically designed device. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Bulkamid vs Contigen®collagen gel for stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-blind, randomized, prospective, 33-center, 2-arm parallel study of hydrogel vs collagen gel with followup to 1 year. At baseline patients underwent physical examination and bladder testing, and completed quality of life questionnaires and bladder diaries. After randomization patients could receive up to 3 injections at 1-month intervals. Patients were assessed 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after bulking. They completed bladder diaries and quality of life questionnaires, and pad weight was tested. At the last visit Valsalva leak point pressure was measured. Subjective and objective incontinence outcomes and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: Of the 345 women 229 were randomized to hydrogel and 116 were randomized to collagen gel. At 12 months a 50% or greater decrease in leakage and incontinence episodes was seen in 53.2% and 55.4% of patients who received hydrogel and collagen gel, respectively. At 12 months 47.2% of patients with hydrogel and 50% with collagen gel reported zero stress incontinence episodes, and 77.1% and 70%, respectively, considered themselves cured or improved. Major adverse events were rare in each group. CONCLUSIONS:Bulkamid is not inferior to Contigen. It has a favorable, persistent effect on stress urinary incontinence with a low risk of serious adverse events. Bulkamid is a new, simple, office based bulking system that shows promise as a treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence, particularly since Contigen is no longer commercially available.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Bulkamid® is a new polyacrylamide hydrogel bulking agent for stress urinary incontinence that is injected in the urethral submucosa using a specifically designed device. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Bulkamid vs Contigen® collagen gel for stress urinary incontinence or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-blind, randomized, prospective, 33-center, 2-arm parallel study of hydrogel vs collagen gel with followup to 1 year. At baseline patients underwent physical examination and bladder testing, and completed quality of life questionnaires and bladder diaries. After randomization patients could receive up to 3 injections at 1-month intervals. Patients were assessed 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after bulking. They completed bladder diaries and quality of life questionnaires, and pad weight was tested. At the last visit Valsalva leak point pressure was measured. Subjective and objective incontinence outcomes and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: Of the 345 women 229 were randomized to hydrogel and 116 were randomized to collagen gel. At 12 months a 50% or greater decrease in leakage and incontinence episodes was seen in 53.2% and 55.4% of patients who received hydrogel and collagen gel, respectively. At 12 months 47.2% of patients with hydrogel and 50% with collagen gel reported zero stress incontinence episodes, and 77.1% and 70%, respectively, considered themselves cured or improved. Major adverse events were rare in each group. CONCLUSIONS:Bulkamid is not inferior to Contigen. It has a favorable, persistent effect on stress urinary incontinence with a low risk of serious adverse events. Bulkamid is a new, simple, office based bulking system that shows promise as a treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence, particularly since Contigen is no longer commercially available.
Authors: Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ron J Jankowski; Le Mai Tu; Christopher Carlson; Magali Robert; Kevin Carlson; David Quinlan; Andreas Eisenhardt; Min Chen; Scott Snyder; Ryan Pruchnic; Michael Chancellor; Roger Dmochowski; Melissa R Kaufman; Lesley Carr Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Stefan Mohr; Christine Marthaler; Sara Imboden; Ash Monga; Michel D Mueller; Annette Kuhn Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Christopher J Hillary; Sabiniano Roman; Sheila MacNeil; Wilhelm K Aicher; Arnulf Stenzl; Christopher R Chapple Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 14.432