Literature DB >> 24704089

Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits.

Shoshana M Landow1, Ashley Mateus2, Kaveri Korgavkar3, Deborah Nightingale4, Martin A Weinstock5.   

Abstract

Teledermatology makes 3 promises: better, cheaper, and faster dermatologic care. It is "better" because, although it cannot offer as much to the patient as a traditional visit, it extends the dermatologist's reach to places and in ways not previously possible as a result of time and place limitations; it is "cheaper and faster" because it has the potential to reduce costs and increase efficiency for both patients and providers. For teledermatology to fulfill these promises, it must enable dermatologists to improve access by increasing the number of patients evaluated and treated. Increased patient access depends on maximizing a scarce resource-dermatologists' time-in part by avoiding unnecessary and time-consuming face-to-face appointments. We examined the literature to date to determine which teledermatology programs have greater or lesser success in reducing face-to-face visits. Our review highlights 4 factors that are associated with a higher number of face-to-face appointments avoided by teledermatology programs: (1) effective preselection of patients for teleconsultation, (2) high-quality photographic images, (3) dermoscopy if pigmented lesions are evaluated, and (4) effective infrastructure and culture in place to implement teleconsultation recommendations.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access; appointments avoided; store-and-forward dermatology; teledermatology; telehealth; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24704089     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  20 in total

Review 1.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Joseph C Kvedar; Michael Gates
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Cost-effectiveness of Skin Cancer Referral and Consultation Using Teledermoscopy in Australia.

Authors:  Centaine L Snoswell; Liam J Caffery; Jennifer A Whitty; H Peter Soyer; Louisa G Gordon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Mobile teledermatology for a prompter and more efficient dermatological care in rural Mongolia.

Authors:  K Byamba; S Syed-Abdul; M García-Romero; C-W Huang; S Nergyi; A Nyamdorj; P-A Nguyen; U Iqbal; K Paik; L Celi; V Nikore; M Somai; W-S Jian; Y-C Li
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 5.  Teledermatology Addressing Disparities in Health Care Access: a Review.

Authors:  Spandana Maddukuri; Jay Patel; Jules B Lipoff
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2021-03-12

6.  Advancing Survivors' Knowledge (ASK) about skin cancer study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Gregory T Armstrong; Robyn R Keske; Jessica A Davine; Aaron J McDonald; Kim M Sprunck-Harrild; Catherine Coleman; Sebastien J Haneuse; Ann C Mertens; Karen M Emmons; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elena B Elkin; Stephen W Dusza; Leslie L Robison; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopically Equivocal Pink Cutaneous Lesions with Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Telemedicine Settings: Double Reader Concordance Evaluation of 316 Cases.

Authors:  J Łudzik; A M Witkowski; I Roterman-Konieczna; S Bassoli; F Farnetani; G Pellacani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What drives attitude towards telemedicine among families of pediatric patients? A survey.

Authors:  Luisa Russo; Ilaria Campagna; Beatrice Ferretti; Eleonora Agricola; Elisabetta Pandolfi; Emanuela Carloni; Angelo D'Ambrosio; Francesco Gesualdo; Alberto E Tozzi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  Teledermatology: An updated overview of clinical applications and reimbursement policies.

Authors:  M Campagna; F Naka; J Lu
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-20

Review 10.  Two Decades of Teledermatology: Current Status and Integration in National Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  E Tensen; J P van der Heijden; M W M Jaspers; L Witkamp
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2016-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.