Literature DB >> 24703750

Why do chimpanzees hunt? Considering the benefits and costs of acquiring and consuming vertebrate versus invertebrate prey.

Claudio Tennie1, Robert C O'Malley2, Ian C Gilby3.   

Abstract

Understanding the benefits and costs of acquiring and consuming different forms of animal matter by primates is critical for identifying the selective pressures responsible for increased meat consumption in the hominin lineage. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are unusual among primates in the amount of vertebrate prey they consume. Still, surprisingly little is known about the nutritional benefits of eating meat for this species. In order to understand why chimpanzees eat vertebrates, it is critical to consider the relative benefits and costs of other types of faunivory - including invertebrates. Although we lack specific nutritional data on the flesh and organs of chimpanzee prey, the macronutrient profiles of insects and wild vertebrate meat are generally comparable on a gram-to-gram basis. There are currently very few data on the micronutrient (vitamin and mineral) content of meat consumed by chimpanzees. With few exceptions, the advantages of hunting vertebrate prey include year-round availability, rapid acquisition of larger packages and reduced handling/processing time (once prey are encountered or detected). The disadvantages of hunting vertebrate prey include high potential acquisition costs per unit time (energy expenditure and risk of injury) and greater contest competition with conspecifics. Acquiring an equivalent mass of invertebrates (to match even a small scrap of meat) is possible, but typically takes more time. Furthermore, in contrast to vertebrate prey, some insect resources are effectively available only at certain times of the year. Here we identify the critical data needed to test our hypothesis that meat scraps may have a higher (or at least comparable) net benefit:cost ratio than insect prey. This would support the 'meat scrap' hypothesis as an explanation for why chimpanzees hunt in groups even when doing so does not maximize an individual's energetic gain.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cooperation; Insectivory; Macronutrients; Meat scrap hypothesis; Micronutrients; Pan troglodytes; Predation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703750     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  5 in total

1.  Free hand hitting of stone-like objects in wild gorillas.

Authors:  Shelly Masi; Emmanuelle Pouydebat; Aurore San-Galli; Ellen Meulman; Thomas Breuer; Jonathan Reeves; Claudio Tennie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Reproductive state and rank influence patterns of meat consumption in wild female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii).

Authors:  Robert C O'Malley; Margaret A Stanton; Ian C Gilby; Elizabeth V Lonsdorf; Anne Pusey; A Catherine Markham; Carson M Murray
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  'Impact hunters' catalyse cooperative hunting in two wild chimpanzee communities.

Authors:  Ian C Gilby; Zarin P Machanda; Deus C Mjungu; Jeremiah Rosen; Martin N Muller; Anne E Pusey; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Balancing costs and benefits in primates: ecological and palaeoanthropological views.

Authors:  Cécile Garcia; Sébastien Bouret; François Druelle; Sandrine Prat
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  New evidence on the tool-assisted hunting exhibited by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in a savannah habitat at Fongoli, Sénégal.

Authors:  J D Pruetz; P Bertolani; K Boyer Ontl; S Lindshield; M Shelley; E G Wessling
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.