Literature DB >> 24703625

There is still a care gap in osteoporosis management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Jennifer Watt1, Andy Thompson2, Nicole Le Riche2, Janet Pope3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance rates with the current Canadian osteoporosis guidelines and whether the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis correlated with the likelihood of receiving osteoporosis treatment and having a bone mineral density test.
METHODS: Charts of serial outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis were reviewed to collect bone mineral density test data and patients' use of calcium, vitamin D, and osteoporosis treatment. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to determine if a higher Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score increased the likelihood of osteoporosis treatment or having a bone mineral density test.
RESULTS: Using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture was high in 92 (12.5%), moderate in 216 (29.3%), and low in 429 (58.2%) patients. Compared to those at low risk, patients identified as high risk were more likely to receive osteoporosis treatment (OR 16.31, 95% CI 9.45-28.13, P<0.001); calcium (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.43-6.25, P<0.001); vitamin D (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.12-5.64, P<0.001); and to have had a bone mineral density test (OR 10.22, 95% CI 5.50-18.96, P<0.001). Among 124 patients currently taking prednisone, half (46.8%) were prescribed a bisphosphonate.
CONCLUSIONS: Although compliance with current osteoporosis guidelines remains low among all patients with rheumatoid arthritis, higher risk patients were more likely to have a bone mineral density test and receive treatment for osteoporosis, as indicated by the clear dose response seen along the 10-year fracture risk from low to high-risk groups.
Copyright © 2014 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Chart audit predictors of adherence; FRAX; Osteoporosis; RA; Treatment guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703625     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  6 in total

1.  Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Skeletal complications of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L Heinlen; M B Humphrey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Association of High Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Seropositivity and Lean Mass Index With Low Bone Mineral Density in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Katherine D Wysham; Dolores M Shoback; John B Imboden; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Increased risk of vertebral fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Guangqi Cheng; Hantao Wang; Yu Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Compliance and discontinuation of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with primary osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Takako Suzuki; Yukio Nakamura; Mikio Kamimura; Shota Ikegami; Shigeharu Uchiyama; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  Effectiveness of bazedoxifene in preventing glucocorticoid-induced bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Cho; Hyoungyoung Kim; Jiyoung Lee; Eunwoo Nam; Seunghun Lee; Yun Young Choi; Yoon-Kyoung Sung
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.156

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.