Literature DB >> 24703337

Longitudinal burn scar quantification.

Bernadette Nedelec1, José A Correa2, Ana de Oliveira3, Leo LaSalle4, Isabelle Perrault5.   

Abstract

Quantitative studies of the clinical recovery of burn scars are currently lacking. Previous reports validate the objective, precise, diagnostic capabilities of high-frequency ultrasound to measure thickness, the Cutometer(®) to measure pliability and the Mexameter(®) to measure erythema and pigmentation of scars. Thus, we prospectively quantified clinical characteristics of patient-matched, after burn hypertrophic scar (HSc), donor site scar (D) and normal skin (N) using these instruments. One investigator measured 3 sites (HSc, D, N) in 46 burn survivors at 3, 6, and 12 months after-burn. A mixed model regression analysis, adjusting p-values for multiplicity of testing, was used to compare means among sites and time points. Participants were 41.2±13.5 years old, 87% males, predominantly Caucasian, with an average of 19.5% body surface area burned. HSc thickness decreased significantly between 3 and 6, 6 and 12, and 3 and 12 months (all p<0.0001), but remained thicker than D and N skin (all p<0.0001). Pliability differed significantly between HSc, D and N sites at all time points (all p<0.0001), with HSc and D increasing between 3 and 12 months (p<0.05) but not reaching normal. HSc and D sites were significantly more erythematous than normal skin (p<0.05) at 3 and 6 months but D sites approached normal by 12 months. The only time points at which pigmentation significantly differed were the HSc and D sites at 6 months. Thickness, pliability, erythema and pigmentation of N skin remained similar over the 12 months. We found that post-burn HSc thickness, pliability and erythema differed significantly from D and N skin at 3, 6, and 12 months and does not return to normal by 12 months after-injury; however, significant improvements towards normal can be expected. Donor sites are redder than normal skin at 3 and 6 months but can be expected to return to normal by 12 months. Although the color of HSc and D sites change markedly with time these color changes are primarily due to changes in redness of the site, not melanin in this primarily Caucasian population.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Cutometer; High-frequency ultrasound scanning; Hypertrophic scar; Mexameter; Skin injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703337     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk® and Suprathel®-In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Janine Andreae; Paul Christian Fuchs; Rolf Lefering; Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger; Alexandra Schulz; Mahsa Bagheri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Novel Application of Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA) with Expanded Mesh Skin Grafting Over an Artificial Dermis or Dermal Wound Bed Preparation.

Authors:  Sadanori Akita; Kenji Hayashida; Hiroshi Yoshimoto; Masaki Fujioka; Chikako Senju; Shin Morooka; Gozo Nishimura; Nobuhiko Mukae; Kazuo Kobayashi; Kuniaki Anraku; Ryuichi Murakami; Akiyoshi Hirano; Masao Oishi; Shintaro Ikenoya; Nobuyuki Amano; Hiroshi Nakagawa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Objective assessment of dermal fibrosis in cutaneous scarring, using optical coherence tomography, high-frequency ultrasound and immunohistomorphometry of human skin.

Authors:  S Ud-Din; P Foden; K Stocking; M Mazhari; S Al-Habba; M Baguneid; D McGeorge; A Bayat
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Evaluation of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based rehabilitation for thermal burn injuries: a prospective non-randomized design.

Authors:  Hubert Neubauer; Annette Stolle; Sabine Ripper; Felix Klimitz; Hans Ziegenthaler; Mareike Strupat; Ulrich Kneser; Leila Harhaus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Effectiveness of topical silicone gel and pressure garment therapy for burn scar prevention and management in children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jodie Wiseman; Robert S Ware; Megan Simons; Steven McPhail; Roy Kimble; Anne Dotta; Zephanie Tyack
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Effect of robot-assisted gait training on the biomechanical properties of burn scars: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Cho; So Young Joo; Cheong Hoon Seo
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-10-07

7.  Evaluation of non-invasive bioforensic techniques for determining the age of hot-iron brand burn scars in cattle.

Authors:  Douglas R Tolleson; David W Schafer
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-15

8.  Interim pressure garment therapy (4-6 mmHg) and its effect on donor site healing in burn patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Michelle L Donovan; Michael J Muller; Claire Simpson; Michael Rudd; Jennifer Paratz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27

10.  A mathematical model for the simulation of the formation and the subsequent regression of hypertrophic scar tissue after dermal wounding.

Authors:  Daniël C Koppenol; Fred J Vermolen; Frank B Niessen; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Kees Vuik
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-05-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.