Literature DB >> 24703332

The benefits of 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage for prolonged-stay cardiac surgery patients.

Kanwal Kumar1, Rohit Singal1, Rizwan A Manji1, Ryan Zarychanski2, Dean D Bell1, Darren H Freed1, Rakesh C Arora3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of 24/7 in-house intensivist care for patients requiring prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay following cardiac surgery.
METHODS: A propensity-matched retrospective before-and-after observational study comparing 2 models of ICU physician staffing was undertaken. Previously, residents (with intensivist backup) provided care for patients after cardiac surgery (surgical ICU cohort). ICU physician staffing was modified with the implementation of 24/7 in-house board-certified intensivist coverage in a cardiac surgery ICU (cardiac surgery ICU cohort) for postoperative care. Patients with a prolonged ICU stay (ie, >48 hours) were identified and their outcomes analyzed for both models of care.
RESULTS: Propensity matching between cohorts was successful for 271 patients (75.7%), with matched patients being used for comparison. There was no difference in ICU or 30-day mortality. There was also no difference in ICU length of stay (LOS); however, the median hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the cardiac surgery ICU cohort (12.3 vs 11.0 days; P < .01). There was a decrease in the proportion of patients receiving transfused red blood cells in the cardiac surgery ICU cohort (80.8% vs 65.7%; P < .001). The cardiac surgery ICU cohort had reduced complications relating to sepsis (4.7% vs 0.7%; P < .01) and renal failure (22.5% vs 12.5%; P < .01); however, the identification of neurologic dysfunction was significantly higher (11.1% vs 20.7%; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients requiring a prolonged ICU stay, our model of 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage was not associated with changes in ICU LOS, nor ICU and 30-day mortality. However a reduction in blood product use, ICU complications, and total hospital LOS was observed.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

Review 1.  Telemedicine/Virtual ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Chiedozie Udeh; Belinda Udeh; Nadeem Rahman; Christina Canfield; Jack Campbell; J Steven Hata
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  Is 24/7 In-House Intensivist Staffing Necessary in the Intensive Care Unit?

Authors:  Faisal Masud; Tina Yaqing Cai Lam; Sahar Fatima
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

3.  Characterizing Physician-Staffing Models in the Care of Postoperative Cardiac Surgical Patients in Canada.

Authors:  Rakesh C Arora; Erika Lee; David E Kent; Mina Asif; Yoan Lamarche; Ansar Hassan; Jean Francois Legare; Brett Hiebert
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  Intensivists' Direct Management without Residents May Improve the Survival Rate Compared to High-Intensity Intensivist Staffing in Academic Intensive Care Units: Retrospective and Crossover Study Design.

Authors:  Jin Hyoung Kim; Jihye Kim; SooHyun Bae; Taehoon Lee; Jong Joon Ahn; Byung Ju Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.