Literature DB >> 24703208

Safety and efficacy of uric acid in patients with acute stroke (URICO-ICTUS): a randomised, double-blind phase 2b/3 trial.

Angel Chamorro1, Sergio Amaro2, Mar Castellanos3, Tomás Segura4, Juan Arenillas5, Joan Martí-Fábregas6, Jaime Gállego7, Jurek Krupinski8, Meritxell Gomis9, David Cánovas10, Xavier Carné11, Ramón Deulofeu12, Luis San Román13, Laura Oleaga14, Ferran Torres15, Anna M Planas16.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Uric acid is an antioxidant with neuroprotective effects in experimental models of stroke. We assessed whether uric acid therapy would improve functional outcomes at 90 days in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
METHODS: URICO-ICTUS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial that recruited patients with acute ischaemic stroke admitted to ten Spanish stroke centres. Patients were included if they were aged 18 years or older, had received alteplase within 4·5 h of symptom onset, and had an eligible National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (>6 and ≤25) and premorbid (assessed by anamnesis) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (≤2). Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive uric acid 1000 mg or placebo (both infused intravenously in 90 min during the infusion of alteplase), stratified by centre and baseline stroke severity. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with excellent outcome (ie, an mRS score of 0-1, or 2 if premorbid score was 2) at 90 days, analysed in the target population (all randomly assigned patients who had been correctly diagnosed with ischaemic stroke and had begun study medication). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00860366.
FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2011, and April 30, 2013, we randomly assigned 421 patients, of whom 411 (98%) were included in the target population (211 received uric acid and 200 received placebo). 83 (39%) patients who received uric acid and 66 (33%) patients who received placebo had an excellent outcome (adjusted risk ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·96-1·56]; p=0·099). No clinically relevant or statistically significant differences were reported between groups with respect to death (28 [13%] patients who received uric acid vs 31 [16%] who received placebo), symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (nine [4%] vs six [3%]), and gouty arthritis (one [<1%] vs four [2%]). 516 adverse events occurred in the uric acid group and 532 in the placebo group, of which 61 (12%) and 67 (13%), respectively, were serious adverse events (p=0·703).
INTERPRETATION: The addition of uric acid to thrombolytic therapy did not increase the proportion of patients who achieved excellent outcome after stroke compared with placebo, but it did not lead to any safety concerns. FUNDING: Institute of Health Carlos III of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Fundación Doctor Melchor Colet.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24703208     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70054-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  77 in total

Review 1.  Administration of Uric Acid in the Emergency Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Laura Llull; Sergio Amaro; Ángel Chamorro
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Uric acid enhances longevity and endurance and protects the brain against ischemia.

Authors:  Roy G Cutler; Simonetta Camandola; Neil H Feldman; Jeong Seon Yoon; James B Haran; Sandro Arguelles; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 3.  Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier: Recent Advances in Drug Delivery to the Brain.

Authors:  Mayur M Patel; Bhoomika M Patel
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  A new era for stroke therapy: Integrating neurovascular protection with optimal reperfusion.

Authors:  Ligen Shi; Marcelo Rocha; Rehana K Leak; Jingyan Zhao; Tarun N Bhatia; Hongfeng Mu; Zhishuo Wei; Fang Yu; Susan L Weiner; Feifei Ma; Tudor G Jovin; Jun Chen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  An Outcome Model for Intravenous rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Shreyansh D Shah; Anand K Sarma; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Uric Acid Neuroprotection Associated to IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Pathway Activation in Rat Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Alicia Aliena-Valero; Sergio Rius-Pérez; Júlia Baixauli-Martín; Germán Torregrosa; Ángel Chamorro; Salvador Pérez; Juan B Salom
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 7.  Effect of uric acid in animal models of ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alicia Aliena-Valero; Júlia Baixauli-Martín; María Castelló-Ruiz; Germán Torregrosa; David Hervás; Juan B Salom
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Current disease modifying approaches to treat Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Dan Lindholm; Johanna Mäkelä; Valentina Di Liberto; Giuseppa Mudò; Natale Belluardo; Ove Eriksson; Mart Saarma
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Enrollment Yield and Reasons for Screen Failure in a Large Prehospital Stroke Trial.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Kim; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; David S Liebeskind; Latisha K Ali; Lucas Restrepo; May Kim-Tenser; Miguel Valdes-Sueiras; Marc Eckstein; Frank Pratt; Samuel Stratton; Scott Hamilton; Robin Conwit; Nerses Sanossian
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  [New aspects of stroke medicine].

Authors:  H C Diener; B Frank; K Hajjar; C Weimar
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.