Michael E Ohl1, Kelly Richardson, Peter J Kaboli, Eli N Perencevich, Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin. 1. VA Office of Rural Health (ORH), Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Central Region, Iowa City VAMC, Iowa City, Iowa; Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VAMC, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Rural-dwelling persons with HIV infection often have limited access to HIV specialty care, and they may instead use more nearby primary care. This study described use of infectious disease (ID) specialty and general primary care services among rural compared with urban veterans with HIV in the United States and determined associations between geographic access to ID and primary care and use of care. METHODS: The sample included all veterans in the national Veterans Administration (VA) HIV clinical case registry in 2009 (N = 23,669, 10.2% rural). Geographic access was measured by calculating travel times to the nearest VA primary care and ID specialty clinic. FINDINGS: Rural veterans were less likely than urban to use ID clinics (82% of rural vs 87% of urban, P < .01) and more likely to use primary care (82% vs 73%, P < .01). As travel time to ID care increased from less than 15 minutes to over 90 minutes, use of ID care decreased from 88% to 71% (P < .01), while use of primary care increased from 68% to 86% (P < .0001). In multivariable models, increased travel time to ID care-but not rural residence-was associated with decreased ID and increased primary care use. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with HIV who live far from ID specialty clinics are less likely to use specialty care and more likely to use primary care. Specialty clinics should consider using telehealth to deliver care over distance and programs to coordinate "shared care" relationships with distant primary care providers.
PURPOSE: Rural-dwelling persons with HIV infection often have limited access to HIV specialty care, and they may instead use more nearby primary care. This study described use of infectious disease (ID) specialty and general primary care services among rural compared with urban veterans with HIV in the United States and determined associations between geographic access to ID and primary care and use of care. METHODS: The sample included all veterans in the national Veterans Administration (VA) HIV clinical case registry in 2009 (N = 23,669, 10.2% rural). Geographic access was measured by calculating travel times to the nearest VA primary care and ID specialty clinic. FINDINGS: Rural veterans were less likely than urban to use ID clinics (82% of rural vs 87% of urban, P < .01) and more likely to use primary care (82% vs 73%, P < .01). As travel time to ID care increased from less than 15 minutes to over 90 minutes, use of ID care decreased from 88% to 71% (P < .01), while use of primary care increased from 68% to 86% (P < .0001). In multivariable models, increased travel time to ID care-but not rural residence-was associated with decreased ID and increased primary care use. CONCLUSIONS:Persons with HIV who live far from ID specialty clinics are less likely to use specialty care and more likely to use primary care. Specialty clinics should consider using telehealth to deliver care over distance and programs to coordinate "shared care" relationships with distant primary care providers.
Authors: A Ben Appenheimer; Barbara Bokhour; D Keith McInnes; Kelly K Richardson; Andrew L Thurman; Brice F Beck; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Steven M Asch; Amanda M Midboe; Thom Taylor; Kelly Dvorin; Allen L Gifford; Michael E Ohl Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Katherine R Schafer; Helmut Albrecht; Rebecca Dillingham; Robert S Hogg; Denise Jaworsky; Ken Kasper; Mona Loutfy; Lauren J MacKenzie; Kathleen A McManus; Kris Ann K Oursler; Scott D Rhodes; Hasina Samji; Stuart Skinner; Christina J Sun; Sharon Weissman; Michael E Ohl Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Michael E Ohl; Kelly Richardson; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Roger Bedimo; Vincent Marconi; Jamie P Morano; Michael P Jones; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Folake J Lawal; Moshood O Omotayo; Tae Jin Lee; Arni S R Srinivasa Rao; Jose A Vazquez Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Rose S Bono; Bassam Dahman; Lindsay M Sabik; Lauren E Yerkes; Yangyang Deng; Faye Z Belgrave; Daniel E Nixon; Anne G Rhodes; April D Kimmel Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Steven P Masiano; Erika G Martin; Rose S Bono; Bassam Dahman; Lindsay M Sabik; Faye Z Belgrave; Adaora A Adimora; April D Kimmel Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Amanda J Noska; Pamela S Belperio; Timothy P Loomis; Thomas P O'Toole; Lisa I Backus Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Brooke G Rogers; Cassie Sutten Coats; Emily Adams; Matthew Murphy; Cynthia Stewart; Trisha Arnold; Philip A Chan; Amy Nunn Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-10
Authors: Pamela W Klein; Tanya Geiger; Nicole S Chavis; Stacy M Cohen; Alexa B Ofori; Kathryn T Umali; Heather Hauck Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240