Literature DB >> 24702448

Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.

Dimitrios Kourtis1, Günther Knoblich, Mateusz Woźniak, Natalie Sebanz.   

Abstract

We investigated whether people take into account an interaction partner's attentional focus and whether they represent in advance their partner's part of the task when planning to engage in a synchronous joint action. The experiment involved two participants planning and performing joint actions (i.e., synchronously lifting and clinking glasses), unimanual individual actions (i.e., lifting and moving a glass as if clinking with another person), and bimanual individual actions. EEG was recorded from one of the participants. We employed a choice reaction paradigm where a visual cue indicated the type of action to be planned, followed 1.5 sec later by a visual go stimulus, prompting the participants to act. We studied attention allocation processes by examining two lateralized EEG components, namely the anterior directing attention negativity and the late directing attention positivity. Action planning processes were examined using the late contingent negative variation and the movement-related potential. The results show that early stages of joint action planning involve dividing attention between locations in space relevant for one's own part of the joint action and locations relevant for one's partner's part of the joint action. At later stages of joint action planning, participants represented in advance their partner's upcoming action in addition to their own action, although not at an effector-specific level. Our study provides electrophysiological evidence supporting the operation of attention sharing processes and predictive self/other action representation during the planning phase of a synchronous joint task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24702448     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Modulation of Rolandic Beta-Band Oscillations during Motor Simulation of Joint Actions.

Authors:  Mathilde Ménoret; Mathieu Bourguignon; Riitta Hari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Ekaterina Abramova; Judith Bütepage; Francesca Ciardo; Benjamin Crossey; Alfred Effenberg; Dayana Hristova; April Karlinsky; Luke McEllin; Sari R R Nijssen; Laura Schmitz; Basil Wahn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-04

4.  Imitation of coordinated actions: How do children perceive relations between different parts?

Authors:  Sophie J Milward; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review.

Authors:  Aïsha Sahaï; Elisabeth Pacherie; Ouriel Grynszpan; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Silvia Guerra; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices' suboptimal timing?

Authors:  Thomas Wolf; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-05-28

8.  Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourtis; Mateusz Woźniak; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Effects of pointing movements on visuospatial working memory in a joint-action condition: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Divya Bhatia; Vaishnavi Mohite; Pietro Spataro; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-09-03

10.  Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.

Authors:  Laura Schmitz; Cordula Vesper; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-08-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.