Literature DB >> 24702191

Comparative physiology of mice and rats: radiometric measurement of vascular parameters in rodent tissues.

C Andrew Boswell1, Eduardo E Mundo, Sheila Ulufatu, Daniela Bumbaca, Hendry S Cahaya, Nicholas Majidy, Marjie Van Hoy, Michelle G Schweiger, Paul J Fielder, Saileta Prabhu, Leslie A Khawli.   

Abstract

A solid understanding of physiology is beneficial in optimizing drug delivery and in the development of clinically predictive models of drug disposition kinetics. Although an abundance of data exists in the literature, it is often confounded by the use of various experimental methods and a lack of consensus in values from different sources. To help address this deficiency, we sought to directly compare three important vascular parameters at the tissue level using the same experimental approach in both mice and rats. Interstitial volume, vascular volume, and blood flow were radiometrically measured in selected harvested tissues of both species by extracellular marker infusion, red blood cell labeling, and rubidium chloride bolus distribution, respectively. The latter two parameters were further compared by whole-body autoradiographic imaging. An overall good interspecies agreement was observed for interstitial volume and blood flow on a weight-normalized basis in most tissues. In contrast, the measured vascular volumes of most rat tissues were higher than for mouse. Mice and rats, the two most commonly utilized rodent species in translational drug development, should not be considered as interchangeable in terms of vascular volume per gram of tissue. This will be particularly critical in biodistribution studies of drugs, as the amount of drug in the residual blood of tissues is often not negligible, especially for biologic drugs (e.g., antibodies) having long circulation half-lives. Physiologically based models of drug pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics also rely on accurate knowledge of biological parameters in tissues. For tissue parameters with poor interspecies agreement, the significance and possible drivers are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24702191     DOI: 10.1021/mp400748t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

1.  Influence of molecular size on tissue distribution of antibody fragments.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ben-Fillippo Krippendorff; Sharad Sharma; Antje C Walz; Thierry Lavé; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Extra-endothelial TRPV1 channels participate in alcohol and caffeine actions on cerebral artery diameter.

Authors:  Kelsey C North; Jennifer Chang; Anna N Bukiya; Alex M Dopico
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  Interstitial IgG antibody pharmacokinetics assessed by combined in vivo- and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approaches.

Authors:  Miro J Eigenmann; Tine V Karlsen; Ben-Fillippo Krippendorff; Olav Tenstad; Ludivine Fronton; Michael B Otteneder; Helge Wiig
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Computer-assembled cross-species/cross-modalities two-pore physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for biologics in mice and rats.

Authors:  Armin Sepp; Guy Meno-Tetang; Andrew Weber; Andrew Sanderson; Oliver Schon; Alienor Berges
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

6.  Impact of altered endogenous IgG on unspecific mAb clearance.

Authors:  Saskia Fuhrmann; Charlotte Kloft; Wilhelm Huisinga
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Tissue Physiology of Cynomolgus Monkeys: Cross-Species Comparison and Implications for Translational Pharmacology.

Authors:  Danielle Mandikian; Isabel Figueroa; Amy Oldendorp; Hanine Rafidi; Sheila Ulufatu; Michelle G Schweiger; Jessica A Couch; Noel Dybdal; Sean B Joseph; Saileta Prabhu; Gregory Z Ferl; C Andrew Boswell
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Understanding the brain uptake and permeability of small molecules through the BBB: A technical overview.

Authors:  Ekram Ahmed Chowdhury; Behnam Noorani; Faleh Alqahtani; Aditya Bhalerao; Snehal Raut; Farzane Sivandzade; Luca Cucullo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Brain Delivery of Nanomedicines: Trojan Horse Liposomes for Plasmid DNA Gene Therapy of the Brain.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2020-11-16

10.  A TfR-Binding Cystine-Dense Peptide Promotes Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration of Bioactive Molecules.

Authors:  Zachary R Crook; Emily Girard; Gregory P Sevilla; Morgan Merrill; Della Friend; Peter B Rupert; Fiona Pakiam; Elizabeth Nguyen; Chunfeng Yin; Raymond O Ruff; Gene Hopping; Andrew D Strand; Kathryn A K Finton; Margo Coxon; Andrew J Mhyre; Roland K Strong; James M Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.