Literature DB >> 24702042

Health technologies for rare diseases: does conventional HTA still apply?

Steven Simoens1.   

Abstract

As part of a health technology assessment, economic evaluation of health technologies for rare diseases poses specific challenges given that such technologies are rarely cost-effective. Therefore, conventional economic evaluation techniques appear to be less relevant to health technologies for rare diseases. However, the definition of health technology assessment points to multi-criteria decision analysis by stating that a health technology needs to be assessed against multiple criteria in order to pronounce a judgement about the value of the health technology. Thus, this editorial argues that a full health technology assessment which uses a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate the value of a technology can be applied to health technologies for rare diseases. Past experiences demonstrate that the specific characteristics of health technologies for rare diseases can fit in the conventional health technology assessment paradigm by means of multi-criteria decision analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health technology; health technology assessment; multi-criteria decision analysis; rare diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24702042     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2014.906903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  6 in total

Review 1.  How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Potential impact of the implementation of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) on the Polish pricing and reimbursement process of orphan drugs.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kolasa; Krzysztof M Zwolinski; Zoltan Kalo; Tomasz Hermanowski
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Assessing the Preferences for Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Treatments for Rare Diseases.

Authors:  Carina Schey; Maarten Jacobus Postma; Paul F M Krabbe; Olekdandr Topachevskyi; Andrew Volovyk; Mark Connolly
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-08

4.  Criteria and Scoring Functions Used in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Value Frameworks for the Assessment of Rare Disease Therapies: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Tamás Zelei; Nicholas D Mendola; Baher Elezbawy; Bertalan Németh; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Models in Health Technology Assessment of Orphan Drugs-a Systematic Literature Review. Next Steps in Methodology Development?

Authors:  Aleksandra Baran-Kooiker; Marcin Czech; Coen Kooiker
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-10-15

6.  Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?

Authors:  Victoria Charlton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.