Literature DB >> 24701495

Type of conception and outcomes in women with singleton pregnancy.

Manjula Pochiraju1, Praveen Kumar Nirmalan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 4.9 million women in India are infertile. If we add secondary infertility to these estimates, the number of infertile couples in India may rise to 17.9 million. Increased use of assisted conception services and information on outcomes after assisted conceptions are useful, to appropriately counsel women who utilize such services. AIM: To determine as to whether outcomes of pregnancy differ between assisted conceptions and natural conceptions in pregnant women with singleton foetuses. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study done a single tertiary care centre in southern India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included pregnant women with singleton gestations, who delivered at the study institute in 2012. Assisted conception was considered to include all invasive and non-invasive methods like ovulation induction (OI), Intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytopalsmic sperm injection (ICSI). Outcomes of interest included gestational age at delivery, birth weight, small for gestational age babies, still births, neonatal deaths and caesarean sections. Point estimates and the 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) around point estimates of associations with assisted conceptions and outcomes were determined by using bivariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS: This study included 6,712 women who were pregnant with a singleton foetus, including 460 (6.85%, 95% CI: 6.27, 7.48) women who conceived with assistance Women who conceived with assistance were more likely to be older (p<0.001), nulliparous (p<0.001), who had a higher prevalence of obesity (p<0.001), pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (p=0.009), gestational diabetes (p<0.001) and pre-pregnancy hypothyroidism (p<0.001) in this population. Assisted conceptions were not significantly associated with small for gestational age babies (p=0.09), still births (p=0.56), or neonatal deaths (p=0.89). Assisted conceptions were associated with a higher incidence of caesarean sections (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.11-1.70) in a multivariate logistic regression model.
CONCLUSION: After adjusting for differences in maternal characteristics, pregnant women with singleton foetuses, who conceived with assistance, had similar outcomes, except for higher caesarean section rates, as compared to women who conceived naturally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted Conception; Natural conception; Outcomes; Pregnancy; Singleton

Year:  2014        PMID: 24701495      PMCID: PMC3972520          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7907.4020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  14 in total

1.  Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Dhont; P De Sutter; G Ruyssinck; G Martens; A Bekaert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals.

Authors:  J Koudstaal; D D Braat; H W Bruinse; N Naaktgeboren; J P Vermeiden; G H Visser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Dhont; F De Neubourg; J Van der Elst; P De Sutter
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study.

Authors:  B E Reubinoff; A Samueloff; M Ben-Haim; S Friedler; J G Schenker; A Lewin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  High incidence of preterm births and early losses in pregnancy after in vitro fertilisation. Australian in vitro fertilisation collaborative group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-10-26

6.  Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: expectations and outcome.

Authors:  H Verlaenen; H Cammu; M P Derde; J J Amy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Rita Isaksson; M Gissler; A Tiitinen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously.

Authors:  E Maman; E Lunenfeld; A Levy; H Vardi; G Potashnik
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Obstetric outcome in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction.

Authors:  T Tanbo; P O Dale; O Lunde; N Moe; T Abyholm
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Jacques Balayla; Odile Sheehy; William D Fraser; Jean R Séguin; Jacquetta Trasler; Patricia Monnier; Andrea A MacLeod; Marie-Noëlle Simard; Gina Muckle; Anick Bérard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.