| Literature DB >> 24701196 |
Sadaqat Ullah Khan1, Muhammad Fadhil Nuruddin1, Tehmina Ayub1, Nasir Shafiq1.
Abstract
This paper presents a review of the properties of fresh concrete including workability, heat of hydration, setting time, bleeding, and reactivity by using mineral admixtures fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), metakaolin (MK), and rice husk ash (RHA). Comparison of normal and high-strength concrete in which cement has been partially supplemented by mineral admixture has been considered. It has been concluded that mineral admixtures may be categorized into two groups: chemically active mineral admixtures and microfiller mineral admixtures. Chemically active mineral admixtures decrease workability and setting time of concrete but increase the heat of hydration and reactivity. On the other hand, microfiller mineral admixtures increase workability and setting time of concrete but decrease the heat of hydration and reactivity. In general, small particle size and higher specific surface area of mineral admixture are favourable to produce highly dense and impermeable concrete; however, they cause low workability and demand more water which may be offset by adding effective superplasticizer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24701196 PMCID: PMC3948672 DOI: 10.1155/2014/986567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Comparison of physical and chemical properties of OPC and mineral admixtures.
| OPC |
|
|
|
|
| Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific gravity | 3.05 [ | 2.2–2.8 [ | 2.79 [ | 2.6–3.8 | 2.5 | 2.11 [ | The specific gravity of mineral admixtures is generally lesser than cement. Therefore, more volume is obtained when mineral admixture replaces the cement. |
|
| |||||||
| SiO2, % | 20.44 | 35–60* [ | 34.4 [ | 91.4 | 53.87 | 88.32 [ | Amounts of SiO2 and Al2O3 are maximum in |
| Al2O3, % | 2.84 | 10–30* [ | 9.0 [ | 0.09 | 38.57 | 0.46 [ | |
|
| |||||||
| Fe2O3, % | 4.64 | 4–20* [ | 2.58 [ | 0.04 | 1.4 | 0.67 [ | |
| CaO, % | 67.73 | 1–35 [ | 44.8 [ | 0.93 | 0.04 | 0.67 [ | |
| MgO, % | 1.43 | 1.98 [ | 4.43 [ | 0.78 | 0.96 | 0.44 [ | |
| SO3, % | 2.20 | 0.35 [ | 2.26 [ | 0.01 [ | — | — | |
| Na2O, % | 0.02 | 0.48 [ | 0.62 [ | 0.39 | 0.04 | 0.12 [ | |
| K2O, % | 0.26 | 0.4 [ | 0.5 [ | 2.41 | 2.68 | 2.91 [ | |
| MnO, % | 0.16 | — | — | 0.05 | 0.01 | — | |
| TiO2, % | 0.17 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.95 | — | |
|
| |||||||
| Particle size***, | 10–40 [ | ≤45 [ | — | 0.1 [ | 0.5–20 [ | 11.5–31.3 [ | Smaller particle size within concrete causes a greater surface area to react more effectively with the alkaline environment [ |
|
| |||||||
| Specific surface (m2/g)*** | 1.75 BET surface area | 5–9 BET surface area [ | 0.4–0.599 BET surface area [ | 16.455 BET surface area | 12.174 BET surface area | 30.4–27.4 [ |
|
|
| |||||||
| Loss on ignition, % | 1.8 | 0.3–3 [ | 1.32 [ | 2.0 | 1.85 | 5.81 [ | Higher carbon content results in higher LOI in mineral admixtures [ |
|
| |||||||
| Pozzolan reactivity | — | 0.875 [ | 0.040 [ | 1.288 | 1.342 | — | Pozzolan reactivity (gm of Ca(OH)2 consumed per gm of pozzolan) chapelle test [ |
*If the sum of SiO2 and Al2O3 and Fe2O3 exceeds 70%, then it will be classified as ASTM C618 Class F FA; however, if the sum exceeds 50%, then it will be classified as ASTM C618 Class C FA [28]. The CaO content is generally higher than 20% in Class C FA [28].
**The chemical composition of SF varies with the type of alloy that is being produced [42].
***Particle size and specific surface of mineral admixtures vary and greatly depend on grinding mill and duration of grinding.
Figure 1Microstructure of fly ash through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showing particle size distribution.
Figure 2Microstructure of blast furnace slag through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showing particle size distribution [36].
Figure 3Microstructure of silica fume through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showing particle size distribution.
Figure 4Microstructure of metakaolin through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showing particle size distribution.
Figure 5Microstructure of rice husk ash through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showing particle size distribution.
Figure 6Slump of concrete with mineral admixtures.