Literature DB >> 24700614

Systemic protection through remote ischemic preconditioning is spread by platelet-dependent signaling in mice.

Christian E Oberkofler1, Perparim Limani, Jae-Hwi Jang, Andreas Rickenbacher, Kuno Lehmann, Dimitri A Raptis, Udo Ungethuem, Yinghua Tian, Kamile Grabliauskaite, Rok Humar, Rolf Graf, Bostjan Humar, Pierre-Alain Clavien.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), the repetitive transient mechanical obstruction of vessels at a limb remote to the operative site, is a novel strategy to mitigate distant organ injury associated with surgery. In the clinic, RIPC has demonstrated efficacy in protecting various organs against ischemia reperfusion (IR), but a common mechanism underlying the systemic protection has not been identified. Here, we reasoned that protection may rely on adaptive physiological responses toward local stress, as is incurred through RIPC. Standardized mouse models of partial hepatic IR and of RIPC to the femoral vascular bundle were applied. The roles of platelets, peripheral serotonin, and circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) were studied in thrombocytopenic mice, Tph1(-) (/) (-) mice, and through neutralizing antibodies, respectively. Models of interleukin-10 (Il10) and matrix metalloproteinase 8 (Mmp8) deficiency were used to assess downstream effectors of organ protection. The protection against hepatic IR through RIPC was dependent on platelet-derived serotonin. Downstream of serotonin, systemic protection was spread through up-regulation of circulating Vegf. Both RIPC and serotonin-Vegf induced differential gene expression in target organs, with Il10 and Mmp8 displaying consistent up-regulation across all organs investigated. Concerted inhibition of both molecules abolished the protective effects of RIPC. RIPC was able to mitigate pancreatitis, indicating that it can protect beyond ischemic insults.
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a platelet-serotonin-Vegf-Il10/Mmp8 axis that mediates the protective effects of RIPC. The systemic action, the conservation of RIPC effects among mice and humans, and the protection beyond ischemic insults suggest that the platelet-dependent axis has evolved as a preemptive response to local stress, priming the body against impending harm.
© 2014 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700614     DOI: 10.1002/hep.27089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  14 in total

1.  Remote ischemic preconditioning fails to reduce infarct size in the Zucker fatty rat model of type-2 diabetes: role of defective humoral communication.

Authors:  Joseph Wider; Vishnu V R Undyala; Peter Whittaker; James Woods; Xuequn Chen; Karin Przyklenk
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 17.165

2.  Platelet-Mediated Transfer of Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Abrogation by Aspirin But Not by Ticagrelor.

Authors:  Helmut Raphael Lieder; Maria Tsoumani; Ioanna Andreadou; Karsten Schrör; Gerd Heusch; Petra Kleinbongard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.947

3.  No indications for platelet activation in acute clinical myocardial or renal ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Kirsten A Kortekaas; Dorottya K de Vries; Mark Roest; Marlies Ej Reinders; Eric P van der Veer; Robert Jm Klautz; Philip G de Groot; Alexander F Schaapherder; Jan H Lindeman
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Plasma from human volunteers subjected to remote ischemic preconditioning protects human endothelial cells from hypoxia-induced cell damage.

Authors:  Nina C Weber; Isabelle Riedemann; Kirsten F Smit; Karina Zitta; Djai van de Vondervoort; Coert J Zuurbier; Markus W Hollmann; Benedikt Preckel; Martin Albrecht
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 17.165

5.  Platelet aggregation but not activation and degranulation during the acute post-ischemic reperfusion phase in livers with no underlying disease.

Authors:  Rowan F van Golen; Katarzyna M Stevens; Pina Colarusso; Hartmut Jaeschke; Michal Heger
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2015-09-13

Review 6.  Circulating mediators of remote ischemic preconditioning: search for the missing link between non-lethal ischemia and cardioprotection.

Authors:  Muntasir Billah; Anisyah Ridiandries; Usaid Allahwala; Harshini Mudaliar; Anthony Dona; Stephen Hunyor; Levon M Khachigian; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-01-04

7.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Diazoxide Protect from Hepatic Ischemic Reperfusion Injury by Inhibiting HMGB1-Induced TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling.

Authors:  Won Uk Koh; Jiye Kim; Jooyoung Lee; Gi-Won Song; Gyu Sam Hwang; Eunyoung Tak; Jun-Gol Song
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Autophagy in Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Kristina L Go; Sooyeon Lee; Ivan Zendejas; Kevin E Behrns; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Alleviates Hepatic Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury by Regulating Glutathione Production and Transformation.

Authors:  Haoyang Xia; Zhongzhong Liu; Wenjin Liang; Xianpeng Zeng; Yi Yang; Pu Chen; Zibiao Zhong; Qifa Ye
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Microvascular Endothelial Function in Remote Vasculature by Enhanced Prostacyclin Production.

Authors:  Nicolai Rytter; Howard Carter; Peter Piil; Henrik Sørensen; Thomas Ehlers; Frederik Holmegaard; Christoffer Tuxen; Helen Jones; Dick Thijssen; Lasse Gliemann; Ylva Hellsten
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.