Leah S Rohlfsen1, Jennie Jacobs Kronenfeld2. 1. Department of Sociology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, USA lrohlfsen@stlawu.edu. 2. Sociology Program, Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research examined gender differences in self-rated health (SRH) using the differential exposure and differential vulnerability explanations of gender differences in health. METHOD: Trajectories of SRH were estimated using data that spanned 12 years (1992-2004) from the Health and Retirement Study. RESULTS: There was no gender difference in SRH at baseline, but SRH declined faster for males over time. Factors that mediated the gender difference included changes in employment status, smoking behavior, and the onset of health conditions. Moreover, were it not for gender differences in various structural and health status factors, females would have better SRH at baseline and over time. DISCUSSION: Our results differ from previous research, which often shows a female disadvantage that is reduced or disappears at older ages. Furthermore, gender differences in the predictors of SRH (exposure) contribute more to understanding gender differences in SRH than different responses to the predictors (vulnerability).
OBJECTIVE: This research examined gender differences in self-rated health (SRH) using the differential exposure and differential vulnerability explanations of gender differences in health. METHOD: Trajectories of SRH were estimated using data that spanned 12 years (1992-2004) from the Health and Retirement Study. RESULTS: There was no gender difference in SRH at baseline, but SRH declined faster for males over time. Factors that mediated the gender difference included changes in employment status, smoking behavior, and the onset of health conditions. Moreover, were it not for gender differences in various structural and health status factors, females would have better SRH at baseline and over time. DISCUSSION: Our results differ from previous research, which often shows a female disadvantage that is reduced or disappears at older ages. Furthermore, gender differences in the predictors of SRH (exposure) contribute more to understanding gender differences in SRH than different responses to the predictors (vulnerability).
Authors: Cynthia Matossian; Marguerite McDonald; Kendall E Donaldson; Kelly K Nichols; Sarah MacIver; Preeya K Gupta Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 2.681