Literature DB >> 24700448

Validation of the Manchester scoring system for predicting BRCA1/2 mutations in 9,390 families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Karin Kast1, Rita K Schmutzler, Kerstin Rhiem, Marion Kiechle, Christine Fischer, Dieter Niederacher, Norbert Arnold, Tiemo Grimm, Dorothee Speiser, Brigitte Schlegelberger, Dominic Varga, Judit Horvath, Marit Beer, Susanne Briest, Alfons Meindl, Christoph Engel.   

Abstract

The Manchester scoring system (MSS) allows the calculation of the probability for the presence of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes in families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In 9,390 families, we determined the predictive performance of the MSS without (MSS-2004) and with (MSS-2009) consideration of pathology parameters. Moreover, we validated a recalibrated version of the MSS-2009 (MSS-recal). Families were included in the registry of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, using defined clinical criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the predictive performance. The recalibrated model was developed using logistic regression analysis and tested using an independent random validation sample. The area under the ROC curves regarding a mutation in any of the two BRCA genes was 0.77 (95%CI 0.75-0.79) for MSS-2004, 0.80 (95%CI 0.78-0.82) for MSS-2009, and 0.82 (95%CI 0.80-0.83) for MSS-recal. Sensitivity at the 10% mutation probability cutoff was similar for all three models (MSS-2004 92.2%, MSS-2009 92.2%, and MSS-recal 90.3%), but specificity of MSS-recal (46.0%) was considerably higher than that of MSS-2004 (25.4%) and MSS-2009 (32.3%). In the MSS-recal model, almost all predictors of the original MSS were significantly predictive. However, the score values of some predictors, for example, high grade triple negative breast cancers, differed considerably from the originally proposed score values. The original MSS performed well in our sample of high risk families. The use of pathological parameters increased the predictive performance significantly. Recalibration improved the specificity considerably without losing much sensitivity.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; Manchester scoring system; breast cancer; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700448     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

Review 1.  BRCA1 gene variant p.P142H associated with male breast cancer: a two-generation genealogic study and literature review.

Authors:  Claudio Spinelli; Silvia Strambi; Lorenzo Piccini; Leonardo Rossi; Paolo Aretini; Adelaide Caligo
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Familial breast cancer - targeted therapy in secondary and tertiary prevention.

Authors:  Karin Kast; Kerstin Rhiem
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Howell; Annie S Anderson; Robert B Clarke; Stephen W Duffy; D Gareth Evans; Montserat Garcia-Closas; Andy J Gescher; Timothy J Key; John M Saxton; Michelle N Harvie
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  High frequency of pathogenic non-founder germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in families with breast and ovarian cancer in a founder population.

Authors:  J Maksimenko; A Irmejs; G Trofimovičs; D Bērziņa; E Skuja; G Purkalne; E Miklaševičs; J Gardovskis
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.