Robin Som1, Peter J Morris, Simon R Knight. 1. Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Centre for Evidence in Transplantation (CET), The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Graft vessel disease (GVD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac allograft recipients. Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for GVD, and the majority of patients will display abnormal lipid profiles in the years following transplant. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to establish the clinical impact of statins in cardiac allograft recipients, critically appraising the literature on this subject. METHODS: A literature search for randomized studies assessing statin use in cardiac allograft recipients was undertaken. The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Transplant Library from the Centre for Evidence in Transplantation were searched. The primary outcome was presence of GVD. Secondary outcomes included graft and patient survival, acute rejection, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity in outcome reporting and therefore narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The majority of RCTs demonstrated some risk of bias, and methods of outcome measurement were variable. Studies reporting incidence or severity of GVD suggest that statins do confer benefit. Survival benefit from statin use is modest. There is a low incidence of adverse events attributable to statins. There was no difference in the overall number of episodes of rejection. CONCLUSION: Whilst the methodological quality of evidence describing the use of statins in cardiac allograft recipients is limited, the available evidence suggests benefit from their use. This is compatible with the effects of statins in non-transplant patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, the rate of adverse events in the trials is low.
BACKGROUND:Graft vessel disease (GVD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac allograft recipients. Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for GVD, and the majority of patients will display abnormal lipid profiles in the years following transplant. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to establish the clinical impact of statins in cardiac allograft recipients, critically appraising the literature on this subject. METHODS: A literature search for randomized studies assessing statin use in cardiac allograft recipients was undertaken. The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Transplant Library from the Centre for Evidence in Transplantation were searched. The primary outcome was presence of GVD. Secondary outcomes included graft and patient survival, acute rejection, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity in outcome reporting and therefore narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The majority of RCTs demonstrated some risk of bias, and methods of outcome measurement were variable. Studies reporting incidence or severity of GVD suggest that statins do confer benefit. Survival benefit from statin use is modest. There is a low incidence of adverse events attributable to statins. There was no difference in the overall number of episodes of rejection. CONCLUSION: Whilst the methodological quality of evidence describing the use of statins in cardiac allograft recipients is limited, the available evidence suggests benefit from their use. This is compatible with the effects of statins in non-transplant patients with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, the rate of adverse events in the trials is low.
Authors: J A Rodríguez; M G Crespo-Leiro; M J Paniagua; J J Cuenca; L F Hermida; A Juffé; A Castro-Beiras Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Josef Stehlik; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Jason D Christie; Anne I Dipchand; Fabienne Dobbels; Richard Kirk; Axel O Rahmel; Marshall I Hertz Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: D M Becker; B Chamberlain; R Swank; M G Hegewald; R Girardet; K L Baughman; P O Kwiterovich; T A Pearson; W H Ettinger; D Renlund Journal: Am J Med Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Alykhan S Nagji; Tjasa Hranjec; Brian R Swenson; John A Kern; James D Bergin; David R Jones; Irving L Kron; Christine L Lau; Gorav Ailawadi Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: C Olbricht; C Wanner; T Eisenhauer; V Kliem; R Doll; M Boddaert; P O'Grady; M Krekler; B Mangold; U Christians Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: S F Davis; A C Yeung; I T Meredith; F Charbonneau; P Ganz; A P Selwyn; T J Anderson Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D C McGiffin; T Savunen; J K Kirklin; D C Naftel; R C Bourge; T D Paine; C White-Williams; T Sisto; L Early Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael Kühl; Christian Binner; Joanna Jozwiak; Julia Fischer; Jochen Hahn; Alaeldin Addas; Boris Dinov; Jens Garbade; Gerhard Hindricks; Michael Borger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240