Literature DB >> 24699994

Air quality concerns of unconventional oil and natural gas production.

R A Field1, J Soltis, S Murphy.   

Abstract

Increased use of hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") in unconventional oil and natural gas (O & NG) development from coal, sandstone, and shale deposits in the United States (US) has created environmental concerns over water and air quality impacts. In this perspective we focus on how the production of unconventional O & NG affects air quality. We pay particular attention to shale gas as this type of development has transformed natural gas production in the US and is set to become important in the rest of the world. A variety of potential emission sources can be spread over tens of thousands of acres of a production area and this complicates assessment of local and regional air quality impacts. We outline upstream activities including drilling, completion and production. After contrasting the context for development activities in the US and Europe we explore the use of inventories for determining air emissions. Location and scale of analysis is important, as O & NG production emissions in some US basins account for nearly 100% of the pollution burden, whereas in other basins these activities make up less than 10% of total air emissions. While emission inventories are beneficial to quantifying air emissions from a particular source category, they do have limitations when determining air quality impacts from a large area. Air monitoring is essential, not only to validate inventories, but also to measure impacts. We describe the use of measurements, including ground-based mobile monitoring, network stations, airborne, and satellite platforms for measuring air quality impacts. We identify nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOC), ozone, hazardous air pollutants (HAP), and methane as pollutants of concern related to O & NG activities. These pollutants can contribute to air quality concerns and they may be regulated in ambient air, due to human health or climate forcing concerns. Close to well pads, emissions are concentrated and exposure to a wide range of pollutants is possible. Public health protection is improved when emissions are controlled and facilities are located away from where people live. Based on lessons learned in the US we outline an approach for future unconventional O & NG development that includes regulation, assessment and monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699994     DOI: 10.1039/c4em00081a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  17 in total

Review 1.  Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Esther Lim; Hannah Roh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.

Authors:  Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

3.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Characterizing Flaring from Unconventional Oil and Gas Operations in South Texas Using Satellite Observations.

Authors:  Meredith Franklin; Khang Chau; Lara J Cushing; Jill E Johnston
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Cancer Incidence and Mortality among Petroleum Industry Workers and Residents Living in Oil Producing Communities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Felix M Onyije; Bayan Hosseini; Kayo Togawa; Joachim Schüz; Ann Olsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Community concern and government response: Identifying socio-economic and demographic predictors of oil and gas complaints and drinking water impairments in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Cassandra J Clark; Joshua L Warren; Nina Kadan-Lottick; Xiaomei Ma; Michelle L Bell; James E Saiers; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Energy Res Soc Sci       Date:  2021-04-24

7.  Respiratory health, pulmonary function and local engagement in urban communities near oil development.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Temuulen Enebish; Sandrah P Eckel; Sandy Navarro; Bhavna Shamasunder
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.431

8.  A novel energy-efficient pyrolysis process: self-pyrolysis of oil shale triggered by topochemical heat in a horizontal fixed bed.

Authors:  You-Hong Sun; Feng-Tian Bai; Xiao-Shu Lü; Qiang Li; Yu-Min Liu; Ming-Yi Guo; Wei Guo; Bao-Chang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Air concentrations of volatile compounds near oil and gas production: a community-based exploratory study.

Authors:  Gregg P Macey; Ruth Breech; Mark Chernaik; Caroline Cox; Denny Larson; Deb Thomas; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Environmental Justice Dimensions of Oil and Gas Flaring in South Texas: Disproportionate Exposure among Hispanic communities.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Khang Chau; Meredith Franklin; Lara Cushing
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.