Literature DB >> 24699992

Trade-offs between forest protection and wood supply in Europe.

Pieter Johannes Verkerk1, Giuliana Zanchi, Marcus Lindner.   

Abstract

Forest protection is one of the main measures to prevent loss of biological and landscape diversity. This study aimed to assess to what extent forests are currently protected and how felling restrictions affect the potential annual wood supply within 27 European Union member states, Norway, and Switzerland and to discuss trade-offs between intensified use of forest biomass and forest protection efforts. Protected forests covered 33 million ha (20% of total forest area) in 2005, of which 16 million ha was protected for biodiversity and the remaining area for landscape diversity. Within the protected areas, on average 48% of the volume cannot be harvested in forests protected for biodiversity and 40% in forests protected for landscapes. Consequently, 73 million m(3) (10% of the annual theoretical potential supply from the total forest area) of wood cannot be felled from the protected forests in Europe. Protected forests do not necessarily affect wood supply given the current demand for wood in Europe. However, if demand for wood from European forests for material and energy use significantly increases, the impact of existing protected forest networks may become significant after all. On the other hand, wood harvesting is allowed to a fair extent in many protected areas. Hence, the question could be raised whether biodiversity and landscape diversity within designated areas are sufficiently protected. Careful planning is required to accommodate both the protection of biological and landscape diversity and demand for wood, while not forgetting all other services that forests provide.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699992     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0265-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

1.  Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making.

Authors:  Jari Parviainen; Georg Frank
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Matt Walpole; Ben Collen; Arco van Strien; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Rosamunde E A Almond; Jonathan E M Baillie; Bastian Bomhard; Claire Brown; John Bruno; Kent E Carpenter; Geneviève M Carr; Janice Chanson; Anna M Chenery; Jorge Csirke; Nick C Davidson; Frank Dentener; Matt Foster; Alessandro Galli; James N Galloway; Piero Genovesi; Richard D Gregory; Marc Hockings; Valerie Kapos; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Fiona Leverington; Jonathan Loh; Melodie A McGeoch; Louise McRae; Anahit Minasyan; Monica Hernández Morcillo; Thomasina E E Oldfield; Daniel Pauly; Suhel Quader; Carmen Revenga; John R Sauer; Benjamin Skolnik; Dian Spear; Damon Stanwell-Smith; Simon N Stuart; Andy Symes; Megan Tierney; Tristan D Tyrrell; Jean-Christophe Vié; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecology. Importing timber, exporting ecological impact.

Authors:  Audrey L Mayer; Pekka E Kauppi; Per K Angelstam; Yu Zhang; Päivi M Tikka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Luyssaert; E-Detlef Schulze; Annett Börner; Alexander Knohl; Dominik Hessenmöller; Beverly E Law; Philippe Ciais; John Grace
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Sarah F Jackson; Arnold Nagy; Lisette Cantú-Salazar; Mark Johnson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.

Authors:  Eric F Lambin; Patrick Meyfroidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe.

Authors:  Yoan Paillet; Laurent Bergès; Joakim Hjältén; Péter Odor; Catherine Avon; Markus Bernhardt-Römermann; Rienk-Jan Bijlsma; Luc De Bruyn; Marc Fuhr; Ulf Grandin; Robert Kanka; Lars Lundin; Sandra Luque; Tibor Magura; Silvia Matesanz; Ilona Mészáros; M-Teresa Sebastià; Wolfgang Schmidt; Tibor Standovár; Béla Tóthmérész; Anneli Uotila; Fernando Valladares; Kai Vellak; Risto Virtanen
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  High and far: biases in the location of protected areas.

Authors:  Lucas N Joppa; Alexander Pfaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  A conceptual framework for characterizing forest areas with high societal values: experiences from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Central Europe.

Authors:  Tina Simončič; Thomas A Spies; Robert L Deal; Andrej Bončina
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.