Literature DB >> 24699851

Functional Outcomes and Return to Sports After Acute Repair, Chronic Repair, and Allograft Reconstruction for Proximal Hamstring Ruptures.

David A Rust1, M Russell Giveans1, Rebecca M Stone1, Kathryn M Samuelson1, Christopher M Larson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding outcomes and return to sports after surgery for acute versus chronic proximal hamstring ruptures. HYPOTHESIS: Surgery for chronic proximal hamstring ruptures leads to improved outcomes and return to sports but at a lower level than with acute repair. Proximal hamstring reconstruction with an Achilles allograft for chronic ruptures is successful when direct repair is not possible. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, a total of 72 patients with a traumatic proximal hamstring rupture (51 acute, 21 chronic) underwent either direct tendon repair with suture anchors (n = 58) or Achilles allograft tendon reconstruction (n = 14). Results from the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) for activities of daily living (ADL) and sports-related activities, Short Form-12 (SF-12), visual analog scale (VAS), and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were obtained.
RESULTS: The mean time to surgery in the chronic group was 441.4 days versus 17.8 days in the acute group. At a mean follow-up of 45 months, patients with chronic tears had inferior sports activity scores (70.2% vs 80.3%, respectively; P = .026) and a trend for decreased ADL scores (86.5% vs 93.3%, respectively; P = .085) compared with those with acute tears. Patients with chronic tears, however, reported significant improvements postoperatively for both sports activity scores (30.3% to 70.2%; P < .01) and ADL scores (56.1% to 86.5%; P < .01). Greater than 5 to 6 cm of retraction in the chronic group was predictive of the need for allograft reconstruction (P = .015) and resulted in ADL and sports activity scores equal to those of chronic repair (P = .507 and P = .904, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in SF-12, VAS, or patient satisfaction outcomes (mean, 85.2% satisfaction overall).
CONCLUSION: Acute repair was superior to chronic surgery with regard to return to sports. Acute and chronic proximal hamstring repair and allograft reconstruction had favorable results for ADL. For low-demand patients or those with medical comorbidities, delayed repair or reconstruction might be considered with an expected 87% return to normal ADL. For patients who desire to return to sports, acute repair is recommended.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  allograft reconstruction; hamstring; hip injury; tendon repair; tendon rupture; waterskiing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699851     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514528788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  22 in total

1.  Functional impairment after successful surgical reconstruction for proximal hamstring avulsion.

Authors:  Raymond Best; Julia Eberle; Florian Beck; Johannes Beckmann; Ulrich Becker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Proximal rupture of the hamstring tendon : From clinical presentation to diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  S Bauer; M Riegger; K J Friedrich; W Reichert; W G Blakeney; C Haag
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Complete proximal hamstring tendon tear : Anchor-based sliding suture technique for reduction and fixation].

Authors:  S Bauer; M Riegger; W Reichert; W G Blakeney; C Haag
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive proximal hamstring insertion repair].

Authors:  J H Schröder; M Gesslein; M Schütz; C Perka; D R Krüger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Ischiofemoral impingement and hamstring dysfunction as a potential pain generator after ischial tuberosity apophyseal fracture non-union/malunion.

Authors:  Luke Spencer-Gardner; Asheesh Bedi; Michael J Stuart; Christopher M Larson; Bryan T Kelly; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Dry Endoscopic-Assisted Mini-Open Approach With Neuromonitoring for Chronic Hamstring Avulsions and Ischial Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Juan Gómez-Hoyos; Manoj Reddy; Hal D Martin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-05-04

7.  A prospective evaluation of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: improved functional outcomes following surgical repair.

Authors:  William G Blakeney; Simon R Zilko; Steven J Edmonston; Natalie E Schupp; Peter T Annear
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used After Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Authors:  Tara Reza; Andrew J Hinkle; Andre Perez-Chaumont; Symone M Brown; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  [Clinical results after refixation of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures comparing different anchor systems].

Authors:  M Irger; P Forkel; A B Imhoff; L Willinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Reconstruction of Chronic Proximal Hamstring Tear: Description of a Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Mackenzie Grasso; Conor O'Neill; David Constantinescu; Gilbert Moatshe; Alexander Vap
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.