| Literature DB >> 24699271 |
Rubens D M Magalhães1, Mariana C Duarte2, Eliciane C Mattos3, Vivian T Martins1, Paula S Lage2, Miguel A Chávez-Fumagalli2, Daniela P Lage4, Daniel Menezes-Souza5, Wiliam C B Régis6, Maria J Manso Alves3, Manuel Soto7, Carlos A P Tavares1, Ronaldo A P Nagen1, Eduardo A F Coelho8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study analyzed whether or not the in vitro cultivation for long periods of time of pre-isolated Leishmania amazonensis from lesions of chronically infected BALB/c mice was able to interfere in the parasites' infectivity using in vivo and in vitro experiments. In addition, the proteins that presented a significant decrease or increase in their protein expression content were identified applying a proteomic approach. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24699271 PMCID: PMC3974679 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Infection of BALB/c mice.
Mice (n = 8) were infected subcutaneously with 1×106 stationary promastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis. Lesion development in the infected footpads was monitored weekly, up to 8 weeks after infection. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) are shown in (A). Parasite load in the infected footpads, spleen, and liver was analyzed in all animals (B). Other mice (n = 8, per group) were subcutaneously infected with 1×106 stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis obtained from R0 or R30 passages, and the lesion development was monitored up to 8 weeks after infection. Mean ± SD of the groups are shown (C). The parasite load in the infected footpads, spleen, and liver was also evaluated in these groups (D). The experiments were repeated three times, and presented similar results. *Significant difference between the R0 and R30 groups (P<0.05).
Evaluation of in vitro infection.
| Ratio | Percentage of infected macrophages | |||
| R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | |
| 1∶2 | 65.1±1.5 | 37.8±3.2 | 19.2±3.6 | 14.9±2.3 |
| 1∶10 | 96.9±2.6 | 82.8±1.4 | 64.1±2.5 | 59.5±2.2 |
Murine macrophages (5×105 cells) were infected with stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis (1×106 and 5×106, by a ratio of 1∶2 or 1∶10 macrophage per parasites, respectively) and the cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Next, free parasites were removed and the percentage of infected cells and the number of amastigotes per macrophage in each passage (R0, R10, R20, and R30) were analyzed by counting 200 cells in triplicate. Mean ± SD is shown. Data shown are representative of three separate experiments, performed in triplicate, which presented similar results.
Figure 2Two-dimensional profiles of cultures from Leishmania amazonensis.
The 2-DE gels were obtained after the separation of stationary promastigotes extracts (R0, R10, R20, and R30 passages; 650 µg of each extract) by 2-DE (first dimension: IEF pH range 4–7; second dimension: 12% SDS-PAGE) and staining with colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250. The gel fragments in the lower portion of the figures represent evaluated amplifications (see within the dotted lines). 2-DE gels of each passage were derived from four independent protein preparations of each passage. One representative preparation of each sample is showed in this study.
Identification of proteins that presented a significant decrease in their expression content.
| Mascot search results | Normalized values | |||||||||||||
| Match ID | Identification | Uniprot ID |
|
| No. match peptide | Coverage (%) | R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | Fold | One-way ANOVA ( | Function | Literature |
| 116 | Hypothetical protein | E9AVJ0 | 4.65/5.63 | 12/55 | 4(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.46 | 2.18 | 7,24E-04 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 141 | Hypothetical protein | E9ANW9 | 4.90/4.84 | 15/18 | 2(2) | 8 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 2.09 | 6,91E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 142 | Small myristoylated protein-3 | E9APT0 | 4.51/4.70 | 15/13 | 6(4) | 32 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 2.18 | 7,97E-07 | Unknown | Infectivity |
| 169 | Small GTP-binding protein Rab1 | E9AYX8 | 5.36/5.54 | 19/22 | 12(8) | 60 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 3.13 | 4,95E-03 | Transport | Infectivity |
| 184 | Peroxidoxin | E9AW04 | 6.27/6.90 | 20/26 | 2(2) | 6 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 2.38 | 3,24E-03 | Metabolism | Vaccine |
| 185 | Tryparedoxin Peroxidase I | Q4QF76 | 6.19/6.79 | 20/25 | 13(10) | 21 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 2.09 | 3,08E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity |
| 260 | Succinyl-CoA ligase [GDP-forming] beta-chain,putative | E9AT73 | 5.44/6.77 | 28/45 | 6(4) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 4,90E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity |
| 291 | α-tubulin | E9AP62 | 5.33/5.45 | 31/61 | 24(22) | 31 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 2.13 | 7,89E-06 | Structural | Infectivity |
| 312 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase | E9AXJ1 | 6.67/7.52 | 34/55 | 2(1) | 11 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 2.33 | 2,24E-05 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 336 | Metallo-peptidase, Clan MA(E), Family M32 | E9B493 | 5.26/5.51 | 36/57 | 19(8) | 23 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.44 | 2.27 | 3,67E-06 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity |
| 388 | Paraflagellar rod protein 1D | E9ALP7 | 5.34/5.36 | 44/69 | 12(7) | 16 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 1,52E-04 | Structural | Infectivity |
| 412 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit 8 | E9AUD5 | 4.05/5.64 | 48/82 | 4(3) | 4 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 3.70 | 4,87E-03 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 615 | Hypothetical protein | E9ASM0 | 6.61/7.09 | 27/147 | 1(1) | 0 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 9,05E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 640 | Actin | P45520 | 5.85/5.40 | 34/42 | 4(2) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.18 | 5.56 | 6,49E-03 | Structural | Metabolism |
| 646 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein | Q07437 | 4.88/6.05 | 39/45 | 13(11) | 14 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 1,56E-03 | Protein folding | Infectivity |
| 653 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A | O62591 | 4.65/5.83 | 42/45 | 8(4) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 9,39E-03 | Protein synthesis | Vaccine |
| 656 | Paraflagellar rod protein 2C | E9AQV6 | 5.18/5.73 | 43/77 | 4(1) | 5 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 2.71 | 1,57E-04 | Structural | Infectivity |
| 697 | Hypothetical protein | E9B489 | 5.27/5.36 | 25/36 | 1(1) | 4 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 1,47E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 776 | Enolase | E9APW3 | 5.80/5.48 | 30/47 | 4(3) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 2.78 | 9,87E-04 | Metabolism | Infectivity |
| 69 | Glutamine synthetase | E9AKR5 | 5.81/5.71 | 38/43 | 4(3) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 2.13 | 2,29E-05 | Metabolism | Vaccine |
| 76 | Malic enzyme | E9AWR7 | 5.01/5.79 | 39/63 | 13(8) | 18 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 3.70 | 2,85E-04 | Metabolism | Vaccine |
| 77 | Putative phosphatase 2C | E9B0G2 | 4.96/4.93 | 41/43 | 8(7) | 20 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 3.03 | 1,22E-03 | Cell signaling | Infectivity |
| 107 | Elongation factor 2 | E9ASD6 | 6.03/5.77 | 12/95 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 2.08 | 5,56E-03 | Protein synthesis | Vaccine |
| 125 | Endoribonuclease L-PSP (pb5) | E9AW21 | 5.86/5.52 | 13/17 | 2(2) | 9 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 2.50 | 1,98E-03 | DNA binding protein | Therapeutic |
| 149 | Ribonucleoprotein p18 | E9AQ29 | 5.09/5.55 | 16/22 | 4(0) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 2.27 | 2,12E-04 | DNA binding protein | Metabolism |
| 210 | Hypothetical protein | E9AXT3 | 5.64/5.64 | 23/31 | 13(9) | 29 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 2.04 | 1,10E-04 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 211 | Hypothetical protein | E9B549 | 4.37/9.90 | 23/23 | 5(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 2.08 | 1,56E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 235 | Metallo-peptidase, Clan ME, Family M16 | E9B2A8 | 6.64/5.06 | 25/120 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 2.22 | 1,43E-04 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity |
| 239 | β-tubulin | E9AMJ8 | 4.61/5.95 | 25/47 | 20(15) | 32 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 2.38 | 2,64E-05 | Structural | Infectivity |
| 262 | Chain A, Open And Closed Structures Of The Udp-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase From | Q4QDU3 | 4.92/5.84 | 28/56 | 2(1) | 2 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 2.38 | 8,46E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 296 | Peptidase m20/m25/m40 family-like protein | E9B1Y8 | 5.04/5.10 | 32/38 | 5(5) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 2.04 | 5,10E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 308 | S-adenosylmethionine synthetase | E9B1C6 | 5.12/5.42 | 34/44 | 9(5) | 16 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 2.04 | 3,36E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 381 | Protein disulfide isomerase | E9AUD1 | 5.06/5.04 | 42/53 | 12(7) | 22 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 1,05E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity |
| 519 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit | E9ATH0 | 5.14/5.21 | 35/39 | 7(5) | 14 | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 2,13E-10 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 584 | Basic transcription factor 3a | E9ATF9 | 4.00/9.44 | 13/12 | 1(1) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 3.85 | 6,69E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 586 | 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2-2 | Q06382 | 4.04/4.23 | 13/11 | 8(8) | 52 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 3.85 | 2,51E-03 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity |
| 606 | Thiol-dependent reductase 1 | E9B3K3 | 6.38/5.65 | 24/46 | 3(2) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1,71E-05 | Unknown | Vaccine |
) Spots match ID number obtained from ImageMaster Platinum;
) Name of the identified protein;
) Uniprot identification code;
) Experimentally predicted and expected isoelectric point (pI);
) Experimentally predicted and expected molecular weight (Mr, in kDa);
) Number of identified peptides by MS;
) Percentage of the protein sequence covered by identified peptides;
) Normalized data from R0 represented by mean values of each condition divided by R30 value;
) Fold represents the maximum spot intensity mean value of the conditions divided by the smallest value;
) One-way ANOVA (P<0.01) obtained from spot analysis;
) Biological functions according to NCBI, UniProt, and Gene Ontology databases;
) Biological activity and/or immunological application described in other studies: [22] Tull et al., 2010; [23] Oliveira et al., 2006; [24] Daifalla et al., 2011; [25] Iyer et al., 2008; [26] Hunger-Glaser et al., 1999; [27] Werbovetz et al., 1999; [28] Feng et al., 2011; [29] Niemirowicz et al., 2007; [30] Hunger-Glaser et al., 1997; [31] Alcolea et al., 2009; [32] Bhaskar et al., 2012; [33] Khanra et al., 2012; [34] Berberich et al., 2003; [35] Moore et al., 1996; [36] Swenerton et al., 2011; [37] Hummadi et al., 2006; [38] Martins et al., 2006; [39] Burns et al., 1993; [40] Kushawaha et al., 2011; [41] Misra et al., 2005; [42] Bringaud et al., 1995; [43] Eggleson et al., 1999; [44] Mureev et al., 2007; [45] Steiner et al., 2007; [46] Martínez-Rodríguez et al., 2012; [47] Drummelsmith et al., 2004; [48] Achour et al., 2002; [49] Buda et al., 2013; [50] Alcolea et al., 2011; [51] Martín et al., 2009; [52] Silva et al., 2012. The proteins were identified through the data included in the NCBI database (dated June 2012) for Leishmania spp.
Identification of proteins that presented a significant increase in their expression content.
| Mascot search results | Normalized values | |||||||||||||
| Match ID | Identification | Uniprot ID |
|
| No. match peptide | Coverage (%) | R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | Fold | One-way ANOVA ( | Function | Literature |
| 8 | Calreticulin | E9B259 | 4.52/4.51 | 50/45 | 3(3) | 5 | 1.00 | 3.26 | 4.40 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 6.96E-03 | Protein folding | Metabolism |
| 12 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase | E9B494 | 5.44/5.51 | 40/47 | 16(6) | 28 | 1.00 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 2.51 | 2.51 | 2.41E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 303 | 60S acidic ribosomal subunit protein | E8NHJ8 | 5.07/5.00 | 33/35 | 26(21) | 45 | 1.00 | 3.15 | 4.72 | 4.75 | 4.75 | 9.76E-05 | Protein synthesis | Diagnosis |
| 326 | Mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase | E9AW11 | 5.67/5.29 | 36/42 | 10(7) | 23 | 1.00 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 1.72E-04 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 392 | Nucleosome assembly protein | E9ARZ6 | 4.64/4.64 | 45/40 | 17(9) | 25 | 1.00 | 2.17 | 2.49 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.78E-04 | DNA binding protein | Metabolism |
| 420 | ATPase beta subunit | E9AXJ6 | 5.02/5.14 | 49/56 | 60(51) | 49 | 1.00 | 1.74 | 1.89 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 9.55E-04 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 432 | T-complex protein 1, theta subunit | E9AUC7 | 5.27/5.24 | 54/59 | 27(18) | 49 | 1.00 | 1.54 | 2.05 | 3.35 | 3.35 | 3.65E-04 | Protein folding | Metabolism |
| 458 | Chain A, Protein Structure Of Usp From | D3G6S4 | 5.36/5.34 | 63/69 | 4(4) | 3 | 1.00 | 1.82 | 3.11 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 2.57E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 739 | Hs1vu complex proteolytic subunit-like,hs1vu complex proteolytic subunit-like, threonine peptidase, Clan T(1), family T1B | E9ATI1 | 5.24/6.09 | 22/25 | 4(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 1.65 | 1.87 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 3.70E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 767 | 6-phosphogluconolactonase | E9AYQ1 | 5.50/5.22 | 26/29 | 2(2) | 8 | 1.00 | 1.39 | 1.71 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 1.63E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 40 | Heat shock protein 83; HSP 83 | P27741 | 6.27/5.00 | 31/81 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 1.88 | 2.92 | 2.93 | 2.93 | 3.76E-03 | Protein folding | Diagnosis |
| 62 | 2-hydroxy-3-oxopropionate reductase | E9B0E2 | 5.77/5.40 | 26/31 | 6(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 2.39 | 3.13 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 6.53E-05 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 230 | Short chain dehydrogenase | E9B602 | 6.57/6.31 | 25/28 | 3(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 2.16 | 2.61 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 8.48E-04 | Metabolism | Therapeutic |
| 279 | Reiske iron-sulfur protein precursor | E9B632 | 5.57/6.02 | 29/34 | 9(7) | 43 | 1.00 | 1.83 | 2.43 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 6.34E-06 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 327 | Vacuolar ATPase subunit-like protein | E9AKM1 | 4.93/4.85 | 36/42 | 13(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 2.39 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 3.74E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism |
| 510 | Cyclin 1 | E9AMR1 | 5.99/5.67 | 31/36 | 3(1) | 13 | 1.00 | 2.26 | 2.28 | 2.78 | 2.78 | 8.78E-03 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism |
| 529 | Protein transport protein Sec13 | E9B2C5 | 5.69/5.51 | 34/37 | 2(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 2.45 | 2.78 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.79E-03 | Unknown | Metabolism |
| 676 | Hypothetical protein | E9ATK7 | 4.98/4.91 | 98/119 | 33(22) | 27 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 2.75 | 2.80 | 2.80 | 3.84E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
| 735 | Glucose-regulated protein 78; GRP78 | E9AZT9 | 5.15/5.18 | 67/72 | 27(22) | 28 | 1.00 | 4.69 | 4.84 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 9.57E-05 | Protein folding | Vaccine |
) Spots match ID number obtained from ImageMaster Platinum;
) Name of the identified protein;
) Uniprot identification code;
) Experimentally predicted and expected isoelectric point (pI);
) Experimentally predicted and expected molecular weight (Mr, in kDa);
) Number of identified peptides by MS;
) Percentage of the protein sequence covered by identified peptides;
) Normalized data from R0 represented by mean values of each condition divided by R30 value;
) Fold represents the maximum spot intensity mean value of the conditions divided by the smallest value;
) One-way ANOVA (P<0.01) obtained from spot analysis;
) Biological functions according to NCBI, UniProt, and Gene Ontology databases;
) Biological activity and/or immunological application described in other studies: [53] Joshi et al., 1996; [54] Tielens et al., 2010; [55] Soto et al., 1996; [56] Lackovic et al., 2010; [57] Scher et al., 2012; [58] Sánchez-Cañete et al., 2009; [59] Peris et al., 1994; [60] Steiner et al., 2007; [61] Jaramillo et al., 2011; [62] Duclert-Savatier et al., 2009; [63] Celeste et al., 2004; [64] Liu et al., 2011; [65] Leblanc et al., 1998; [66] Priest et al., 1996; [67] Bakker-Grunwald, 1992; [68] Banerjee et al., 2006; [69] Casanova et al., 2008; [70] Jensen et al., 2001. The proteins were identified through the data included in the NCBI database (dated June 2012) for Leishmania spp.
Figure 3Immunoblotting validation of some proteins in Leishmania amazonensis.
Representative immunoblotting of some proteins that presented a significant decrease or increase in their expression content between R0 and R30 passages, using promastigote and amastigotes-like forms of L. amazonensis, are shown here. For each protein [α-tubulin, in A; paraflagellar rod protein 1D, in B; glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) in C, and heat shock protein 83 (HSP83), in D], this image presents one example of correspondent 2-DE spot of promastigote form obtained from R0 or R30 passages. The antibodies used to validate each spot are described in the material and methods section. Asterisks represent the comparison between the expression of the protein in the R0 condition in relation to the R30 sample in each parasite stage, applying the Student's t-test (P<0.05), and the numbers represent the relative variation of each protein in comparison to R0 of each parasite stage. All experiments were performed in triplicate.