| Literature DB >> 24699029 |
Dhitiwass Suvagandha1, Muneko Nishijo2, Witaya Swaddiwudhipong3, Ruymon Honda4, Morimasa Ohse5, Tomiko Kuhara6, Hideaki Nakagawa7, Werawan Ruangyuttikarn8.
Abstract
First, the urinary metabolic profiling by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), was performed to compare ten cadmium (Cd) toxicosis cases from a Cd-polluted area in Mae Sot (Thailand) with gender-matched healthy controls. Orthogonal partial list square-discrimination analysis was used to identify new biomarker candidates in highly Cd exposed toxicosis cases with remarkable renal tubular dysfunction. The results of the first step of this study showed that urinary citrate was a negative marker and myo-inositol was a positive marker for Cd toxicosis in Thailand. In the second step, we measured urinary citrate in the residents (168 Cd-exposed subjects and 100 controls) and found significantly lower levels of urinary citrate and higher ratios of calcium/citrate and magnesium/citrate, which are risk factors for nephrolithiasis, in highly Cd-exposed residents. Additionally, this inverse association of urinary citrate with urinary Cd was observed after adjustment for age, smoking and renal tubular dysfunction, suggesting a direct effect of Cd on citrate metabolism. These results indicate that urinary citrate is a useful biomarker for the adverse health effects of Cd exposure in a Thai population with a high prevalence of nephrolithiasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24699029 PMCID: PMC4025033 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110403661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Clinical characteristics of cadmium toxicosis cases and controls in a non-polluted area.
| Control (N = 10) | Cd Toxicosis Cases (N = 10) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Min–Max | Mean | SD | Min–Max | |||
| Age | years | 67 | 8.6 | 48–77 | 71 | 10.6 | 49–82 | NS |
| Gender ratio | Men/Women | 4/6 | 4/6 | |||||
| Height | cm | 151.6 | 4.9 | 143–159 | 149.5 | 8.7 | 137–168 | NS |
| Weight | kg | 56.3 | 6.7 | 45–65 | 47.4 | 11.9 | 29–65 | NS |
| BMI | kg/m2 | 23.8 | 3.1 | 18.0–28.9 | 21.3 | 5.4 | 12.1–31.8 | NS |
| Urinary Cd # | μg/g Cr | 0.87 | 1.6 | 0.43–2.1 | 11.5 | 1.2 | 9.2–18.7 | *** |
| Urinary β2-MG # | μg/g Cr | 132 | 1.7 | 62–278 | 33,266 | 2.3 | 10,366–138,413 | *** |
| Urinary NAG # | U/g Cr | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.6–6.5 | 14.5 | 1.5 | 9.5–29.4 | *** |
| Urinary amino acids # | μg/g Cr | 96 | 1.3 | 70.9–171.9 | 124 | 1.2 | 99.6–167.4 | * |
| Urinary proline # | μg/g Cr | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.3–6.6 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 2.8–11.5 | NS |
| Serum Cr | mg/dl | 0.93 | 0.18 | 0.6–1.2 | 1.62 | 0.7 | 1.1–3.4 | * |
| RBC | ×10,000 | 508 | 44 | 434–599 | 406 | 56 | 333–514 | *** |
| Hb | g/dl | 13.5 | 1.7 | 11.3–16.3 | 11.5 | 1.1 | 10.2–13.6 | ** |
| Ht | % | 42.2 | 4.5 | 36.4–50.3 | 35.1 | 3.2 | 31.1–41.0 | ** |
| Hypertension | N(%) | 5 | (50) | 6 | (60) | NS | ||
| Diabetes meritus | N(%) | 0 | (0) | 0 | ( 0) | NS | ||
| Nephrolithiasis | N(%) | 1 | (10) | 3 | (30) | NS | ||
Note: #: geometrical mean and standard, N: number of subjects, SD: standard deviation, NS: not significant, Min: minimum, max: maximum; BMI: weight (kg)/(Height (m))2, Cr: creatinine, N: number of subjects; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 1OPLS-DA score plot shows complete discrimination between the Cd exposure group () and control group (■) with no variation between two groups.
Figure 2OPLS-DA S-plot of each variable that used a cut-off value for covariance of p ≥ |0.05| (magnitude) and p(corr) ≥ |0.5| (reliability), which indicates the most different compounds for each group.
Figure 3GC-chromatogram of (a) a highly Cd exposed case in Mae Sot, and (b) a control case in non-polluted area.
Comparison of urinary citrate and myo-inositol concentrations measured by quantification analysis using GC-MS.
| Controls | Cd toxicosis cases | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 10) | (N = 10) | |||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Urinary citrate | mmol/molCr | 3.94 | 1.42 | 0.93 | 2.37 | *** |
| Urinary | mmol/molCr | 0.22 | 2.51 | 1.26 | 3.07 | *** |
Note: Mean: geometrical mean, SD: geometrical standard, ***: p < 0.001.
Comparisons of citrate, calcium and magnesium in urine among subjects with different exposure levels, as analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
| Area | Non-Polluted | Polluted | Model | Comparison | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Low exposed | High exposed | ANOVA | between groups | |||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Men | N = 50 | N = 39 | N = 44 | ||||||
| Citrate# | 0.18 | 2.18 | 0.10 | 2.63 | 0.05 | 2.61 | 0.000 | **: C-L, ***: C-H | |
| Ca# | 0.05 | 2.51 | 0.05 | 2.37 | 0.06 | 2.30 | 0.523 | NS | |
| P# | 0.26 | 1.61 | 0.23 | 2.16 | 0.23 | 1.72 | 0.485 | NS | |
| Mg# | 0.04 | 1.56 | 0.04 | 1.67 | 0.04 | 1.68 | 0.336 | NS | |
| Ca/Citrate | 0.54 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 1.29 | 1.61 | 1.57 | 0.000 | ***: C-H | |
| Mg/Citrate | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 1.28 | 1.51 | 0.000 | ***: C-H | |
| Women | N = 50 | N = 47 | N = 38 | ||||||
| Citrate# | 0.28 | 2.02 | 0.13 | 3.12 | 0.07 | 2.93 | 0.000 | ***: C-L, ***: C-H | |
| Ca# | 0.07 | 2.28 | 0.06 | 2.49 | 0.08 | 2.70 | 0.481 | NS | |
| P# | 0.34 | 1.49 | 0.28 | 1.63 | 0.30 | 1.73 | 0.176 | NS | |
| Mg# | 0.04 | 1.78 | 0.05 | 1.59 | 0.05 | 1.60 | 0.211 | NS | |
| Ca/Citrate | 0.43 | 1.01 | 0.91 | 1.23 | 1.79 | 1.73 | 0.000 | ***: C-H | |
| Mg/Citrate | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.9 | 1.20 | 1.01 | 0.000 | *: C-L, ***: C-H | |
Note: #: Geometrical mean and standard for urinary Cd, citrate, Ca, P and Mg; SD: standard deviation, N = number of subjects, C: controls, L: low exposed group, H: high exposed group; Cr: creatinine, Ca: calcium, Mg: magnesium, Cd: cadmium, β2-MG: beta-2-micloglobuline, NAG: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamidinase; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Correlation coefficients (Spearman’s ρ) of citrate, calcium and magnesium in urine with Cd and renal tubular markers among the subjects participated in 2012 survey.
| Citrate | Ca | P | Mg | Ca/Citrate | Mg/Citrate | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (N = 133) | |||||||||||||
| Cd | −0.482 | *** | 0.067 | −0.122 | 0.084 | 0.448 | *** | 0.463 | *** | ||||
| β2-MG | −0.323 | *** | −0.034 | −0.128 | 0.182 | * | 0.275 | ** | 0.360 | *** | |||
| NAG | −0.112 | −0.175 | * | −0.034 | 0.057 | 0.038 | 0.115 | ||||||
| Women (N = 135) | |||||||||||||
| Cd | −0.504 | *** | 0.151 | −0.089 | 0.108 | 0.574 | *** | 0.554 | *** | ||||
| β2-MG | −0.497 | *** | −0.011 | −0.030 | 0.058 | 0.465 | *** | 0.499 | *** | ||||
| NAG | −0.159 | 0.015 | −0.033 | 0.116 | 0.160 | 0.129 | * | ||||||
Notes: Urinary Cd, citrate, Ca, P and Mg were corrected by urinary creatinine, and transformed to logarismic values. Cr: creatinine, Ca: calcium, Mg: magnesium, N: number of subjects, Cd: cadmium, β2-MG: beta-2-micloglobuline, NAG: N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamidinase, *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Standardized regression coefficients (β) for urinary cadmium and renal markers in linear regression model for urinary citrate, calcium/citrate and magnesium/citrate.
| Explanatory Factors | Citrate | Ca/Ctrate | Mg/Ctrate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | β | |||||
|
| (N = 133) | ||||||
| Model 1 | Age | −0.050 | −0.119 | 0.031 | |||
| Smoking | 0.030 | −0.311 | −0.130 | ||||
| Cd | −0.451 | *** | 0.311 | *** | 0.349 | *** | |
| Model 2 | Age | 0.004 | −0.200 | * | −0.042 | ||
| Smoking | 0.018 | −0.110 | −0.114 | ||||
| Cd | −0.373 | *** | 0.193 | 0.243 | * | ||
| β2-MG | −0.155 | 0.233 | * | 0.209 | |||
| Model 3 | Age | −0.058 | −0.112 | −0.025 | |||
| Smoking | 0.028 | −0.126 | −0.142 | ||||
| Cd | −0.458 | *** | 0.316 | ** | 0.302 | ** | |
| NAG | 0.024 | −0.021 | 0.166 | ||||
|
| (N = 135) | ||||||
| Model 1 | Age | −0.152 | 0.070 | 0.220 | ** | ||
| Smoking | −0.107 | 0.213 | 0.116 | ||||
| Cd | −0.445 | *** | 0.329 | *** | 0.341 | *** | |
| Model 2 | Age | 0.021 | −0.043 | 0.077 | |||
| Smoking | −0.084 | 0.197 | * | 0.096 | |||
| Cd | −0.271 | ** | 0.215 | * | 0.196 | * | |
| β2-MG | −0.382 | *** | 0.250 | * | 0.317 | ** | |
| Model 3 | Age | −0.213 | * | 0.113 | 0.269 | ** | |
| Smoking | −0.122 | 0.224 | ** | 0.129 | |||
| Cd | −0.485 | *** | 0.358 | *** | 0.373 | *** | |
| NAG | 0.152 | −0.109 | −0.122 | ||||
Note: Urinary Cd, citrate, Ca, P and Mg were corrected by urinary creatinine, and transformed to logarismic values, Cr: creatinine, Ca: calcium, Mg: magnesium, Cd: cadmium, β2-MG: beta-2-micloglobuline, NAG: N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamidinase, *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.
Standardized regression coefficients (β) for urinary cadmium and renal markers in linear regression model for urinary citrate, calcium/citrate and magnesium/citrate in non-smokers.
| Explanatory Factors | Citrate | Ca/Ctrate | Mg/Ctrate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | β | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Model 1 | Age | −0.010 | −0.075 | 0.014 | |||
| Cd | −0.555 | *** | 0.341 | * | 0.381 | ** | |
| Model 2 | Age | 0.110 | −0.200 | * | −0.042 | ||
| Cd | −0.388 | ** | 0.193 | 0.243 | * | ||
| β2−MG | −0.310 | 0.233 | * | 0.209 | |||
| Model 3 | Age | −0.009 | −0.037 | −0.047 | |||
| Cd | −0.555 | *** | 0.380 | * | 0.320 | * | |
| NAG | 0.003 | −0.119 | 0.188 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Model 1 | Age | −0.178 | 0.145 | 0.232 | ** | ||
| Cd | −0.427 | *** | 0.264 | ** | 0.286 | *** | |
| Model 2 | Age | −0.021 | 0.004 | 0.080 | |||
| Cd | −0.285 | ** | 0.136 | 0.148 | |||
| β2−MG | −0.321 | ** | 0.288 | * | 0.312 | * | |
| Model 3 | Age | −0.269 | ** | 0.247 | * | 0.307 | ** |
| Cd | −0.468 | *** | 0.310 | ** | 0.320 | ** | |
| NAG | 0.199 | * | −0.223 | * | −0.163 | ||
Note: Urinary Cd, citrate, Ca, P and Mg were corrected by urinary creatinine, and transformed to logarismic values, Cr: creatinine, Ca: calcium, Mg: magnesium, Cd: cadmium, β2-MG: beta-2-micloglobuline, NAG: N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamidinase, *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001.