Literature DB >> 24699016

Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.

Joseph A Maldjian1, Elizabeth M Davenport2, Christopher T Whitlow3.   

Abstract

Interhemispheric connectivity with resting state MEG has been elusive, and demonstration of the default mode network (DMN) yet more challenging. Recent seed-based MEG analyses have shown interhemispheric connectivity using power envelope correlations. The purpose of this study is to compare graph theoretic maps of brain connectivity generated using MEG with and without signal leakage correction to evaluate for the presence of interhemispheric connectivity. Eight minutes of resting state eyes-open MEG data were obtained in 22 normal male subjects enrolled in an IRB-approved study (ages 16-18). Data were processed using an in-house automated MEG processing pipeline and projected into standard (MNI) source space at 7mm resolution using a scalar beamformer. Mean beta-band amplitude was sampled at 2.5second epochs from the source space time series. Leakage correction was performed in the time domain of the source space beam formed signal prior to amplitude transformation. Graph theoretic voxel-wise source space correlation connectivity analysis was performed for leakage corrected and uncorrected data. Degree maps were thresholded across subjects for the top 20% of connected nodes to identify hubs. Additional degree maps for sensory, visual, motor, and temporal regions were generated to identify interhemispheric connectivity using laterality indices. Hubs for the uncorrected MEG networks were predominantly symmetric and midline, bearing some resemblance to fMRI networks. These included the cingulate cortex, bilateral inferior frontal lobes, bilateral hippocampal formations and bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. These uncorrected networks however, demonstrated little to no interhemispheric connectivity using the ROI-based degree maps. Leakage corrected MEG data identified the DMN, with hubs in the posterior cingulate and biparietal areas. These corrected networks demonstrated robust interhemispheric connectivity for the ROI-based degree maps. Graph theoretic analysis of MEG resting state data without signal leakage correction can demonstrate symmetric networks with some resemblance to fMRI networks. These networks however, are an artifact of high local correlation from signal leakage and lack interhemispheric connectivity. Following signal leakage correction, MEG hubs emerge in the DMN, with strong interhemispheric connectivity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Default mode network; Graph theory; Interhemispheric connectivity; Magnetoencephalography; PC=phase coherence; PLI=phase lag index; fMRI=functional MRI; icoh=imaginary coherence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24699016      PMCID: PMC4049007          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks.

Authors:  Francesco de Pasquale; Stefania Della Penna; Abraham Z Snyder; Christopher Lewis; Dante Mantini; Laura Marzetti; Paolo Belardinelli; Luca Ciancetta; Vittorio Pizzella; Gian Luca Romani; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf).

Authors:  S E Robinson
Journal:  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-30

3.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Mark Woolrich; Henry Luckhoo; Darren Price; Joanne R Hale; Mary C Stephenson; Gareth R Barnes; Stephen M Smith; Peter G Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Using variance information in magnetoencephalography measures of functional connectivity.

Authors:  Emma L Hall; Mark W Woolrich; Carlos E Thomaz; Peter G Morris; Matthew J Brookes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources.

Authors:  Cornelis J Stam; Guido Nolte; Andreas Daffertshofer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Erin Simon Schwartz; J Christopher Edgar; William C Gaetz; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-11-24

7.  Head impact exposure in youth football: high school ages 14 to 18 years and cumulative impact analysis.

Authors:  Jillian E Urban; Elizabeth M Davenport; Adam J Golman; Joseph A Maldjian; Christopher T Whitlow; Alexander K Powers; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Functional brain network analysis using minimum spanning trees in Multiple Sclerosis: an MEG source-space study.

Authors:  P Tewarie; A Hillebrand; M M Schoonheim; B W van Dijk; J J G Geurts; F Barkhof; C H Polman; C J Stam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks.

Authors:  Danielle S Bassett; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Sophie Achard; Thomas Duke; Edward Bullmore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Joanne R Hale; Johanna M Zumer; Claire M Stevenson; Susan T Francis; Gareth R Barnes; Julia P Owen; Peter G Morris; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  16 in total

1.  Directed functional connections underlying spontaneous brain activity.

Authors:  Ana Coito; Christoph M Michel; Serge Vulliemoz; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The vast potential and bright future of neuroimaging.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Rivka Colen; Christopher T Whitlow; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Alterations in the Magnetoencephalography Default Mode Effective Connectivity following Concussion.

Authors:  D D Reddy; E M Davenport; F F Yu; B Wagner; J E Urban; C T Whitlow; J D Stitzel; J A Maldjian
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes.

Authors:  G L Colclough; M J Brookes; S M Smith; M W Woolrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Protocol for a prospective neuroimaging study investigating the supraspinal control of lower urinary tract function in healthy controls and patients with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Matthias Walter; Lars Michels; Spyros Kollias; Philip E van Kerrebroeck; Thomas M Kessler; Ulrich Mehnert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Guiding functional connectivity estimation by structural connectivity in MEG: an application to discrimination of conditions of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  José Angel Pineda-Pardo; Ricardo Bruña; Mark Woolrich; Alberto Marcos; Anna C Nobre; Fernando Maestú; Diego Vidaurre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Power spectral aspects of the default mode network in schizophrenia: an MEG study.

Authors:  June Sic Kim; Kyung Soon Shin; Wi Hoon Jung; Sung Nyun Kim; Jun Soo Kwon; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Prejaas K Tewarie; Benjamin A E Hunt; Sian E Robson; Lauren E Gascoyne; Elizabeth B Liddle; Peter F Liddle; Peter G Morris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multi-frequency analysis of brain connectivity networks in migraineurs: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Di Wu; Yuchen Zhou; Jing Xiang; Lu Tang; Hongxing Liu; Shuyang Huang; Ting Wu; Qiqi Chen; Xiaoshan Wang
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?

Authors:  G L Colclough; M W Woolrich; P K Tewarie; M J Brookes; A J Quinn; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.