Chris Cooper1, Paul Levay2, Theo Lorenc3, Gillian M Craig4. 1. PenTAG, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, EX2 4SG, UK. Electronic address: Christopher.Cooper@exeter.ac.uk. 2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester, M1 4BT, UK. 3. Department of Social & Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. 4. School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article discusses how hard-to-reach population groups were conceptualized into a search filter. The objectives of this article were to (1) discuss how the authors designed a multistranded population search filter and (2) retrospectively test the effectiveness of the search filter in capturing all relevant populations (eg, homeless people, immigrants, substance misusers) in a public health systematic review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic and retrospective analysis via a case study. Retrospective analysis of the search filter was conducted by comparing the MEDLINE search results retrieved without using the search filter against those retrieved with the search filter. A total of 5,465 additional results from the unfiltered search were screened to the same criteria as the filtered search. RESULTS: No additional populations were identified in the unfiltered sample. The search filter reduced the volume of MEDLINE hits to screen by 64%, with no impact on inclusion of populations. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the filter in capturing all relevant UK populations for the review. This suggests that well-planned search filters can be written for reviews that analyze imprecisely defined population groups. This filter could be used in topic areas of associated comorbidities, for rapid clinical searches, or for investigating hard-to-reach populations.
OBJECTIVES: This article discusses how hard-to-reach population groups were conceptualized into a search filter. The objectives of this article were to (1) discuss how the authors designed a multistranded population search filter and (2) retrospectively test the effectiveness of the search filter in capturing all relevant populations (eg, homeless people, immigrants, substance misusers) in a public health systematic review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic and retrospective analysis via a case study. Retrospective analysis of the search filter was conducted by comparing the MEDLINE search results retrieved without using the search filter against those retrieved with the search filter. A total of 5,465 additional results from the unfiltered search were screened to the same criteria as the filtered search. RESULTS: No additional populations were identified in the unfiltered sample. The search filter reduced the volume of MEDLINE hits to screen by 64%, with no impact on inclusion of populations. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the filter in capturing all relevant UK populations for the review. This suggests that well-planned search filters can be written for reviews that analyze imprecisely defined population groups. This filter could be used in topic areas of associated comorbidities, for rapid clinical searches, or for investigating hard-to-reach populations.
Keywords:
Disadvantaged; Equity; Hard to reach; Information retrieval; Information science; Literature searching; Search filter; Systematic review methodology; Tuberculosis; Vulnerable
Authors: Suzanne K Linder; Geetanjali R Kamath; Gregory F Pratt; Smita S Saraykar; Robert J Volk Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-12-29 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Elie A Akl; Vivian Welch; Kevin Pottie; Javier Eslava-Schmalbach; Andrea Darzi; Ivan Sola; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Jasvinder Singh; M Hassan Murad; Joerg Meerpohl; Roger Stanev; Eddy Lang; Elizabeth Matovinovic; Beverley Shea; Thomas Agoritsas; Paul E Alexander; Alexandra Snellman; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; David Gloss; Lehana Thabane; Chunhu Shi; Airton T Stein; Ravi Sharaf; Matthias Briel; Gordon Guyatt; Holger Schünemann; Peter Tugwell Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Jo Varley-Campbell; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.615