Literature DB >> 24697669

The benefits of using a bismuth-containing, radiation-absorbing drape in cardiac resynchronization implant procedures.

Michael A Jones1, Mary Cocker, Raj Khiani, Paul Foley, Norman Qureshi, Kelvin C K Wong, Kim Rajappan, Timothy R Betts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure is a major concern in cardiac device implantation, especially cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures. The RadPad™ (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA), a radiation-attenuating adhesive drape, has been shown to be beneficial in several clinical settings involving fluoroscopy, but less is known about the actual benefits in CRT procedures.
METHODS: Consecutive CRT implants performed with and without a RadPad™ drape over a 10-month period were analyzed. Two thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were attached to each implanting physician at several locations (adjacent to eyes, center abdomen [outside lead apron], left and right index fingers, and dorsum of the right foot). Results were corrected for background using control TLDs, and normalized to dose-area product (DAP).
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (31 male), 16 with and 20 without the RadPad™, were included in the study. No technical problems were caused by the presence of the radiation-absorbing drape. Time required to position the drape never exceeded 30 seconds, no acute skin reactions were noted, and no radiation-absorbing drape became displaced. Despite a trend toward longer fluoroscopy times and higher DAPs in the radiation-absorbing drape group, radiation exposure was significantly reduced: 65% in the case of the hands and body (P < 0.001), and 40% the eyes (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The use of a radiation-absorbing drape results in a significant reduction in radiation dose to the implanting physician during CRT procedures. Not only is the dose to the hands reduced, but also the eye and body doses are significantly reduced. The routine use of radiation-absorbing drapes should be considered for all CRT implant procedures in the light of these findings. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRT; cardiac pacemaker; defibrillator; exposure; radiation; radiation-absorbing drape

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24697669     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of the effect of a radiation-attenuating drape on radiation exposure to endoscopy staff during ERCP.

Authors:  Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Harry R Aslanian; Loren Laine; James Farrell; Maria M Ciarleglio; Yanhong Deng; Henry Ho; Priya A Jamidar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The Efficacy of Shielding Systems for Reducing Operator Exposure during Neurointerventional Procedures: A Real-World Prospective Study.

Authors:  T R Miller; J Zhuo; G Jindal; R Shivashankar; N Beaty; D Gandhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Efficacy of RADPAD protective drape during coronary angiography.

Authors:  B Kherad; T Jerichow; F Blaschke; M Noutsias; B Pieske; C Tschöpe; F Krackhardt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 1.443

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.