Literature DB >> 24696818

An important player in brine shrimp lethality bioassay: The solvent.

Chao Wu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24696818      PMCID: PMC3960796     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res        ISSN: 0976-2094


× No keyword cloud information.
Brine shrimp lethality bioassay is a simple, high throughput cytotoxicity test of bioactive chemicals. It is based on the killing ability of test compounds on a simple zoological organism-brine shrimp (Artemia salina).[1] This assay was first proposed by Michael et al., and further developed by several groups.[234] The brine shrimp lethality bioassay is widely used in the evaluation of toxicity of heavy metals, pesticides, medicines especially natural plant extracts and etc.[56] It's a preliminary toxicity screen for further experiments on mammalian animal models. One important aspect of this assay is that the solvent used in this assay may give false positive signals due to the toxicity of the solvent itself. It has been well-known that some organic solvent and detergents have high cytotoxcity in vivo. A systematic study on how high concentration of solvent affects the results from brine shrimp lethality bioassay and guidance for maximum working concentration of solvents is needed. The article published in this issue “Interference from ordinarily used solvents in the outcomes of A. salina Lethality Test” fills this gap very well. In this study, the authors tested the solvent toxicity effect on brine shrimp experimentally. This is a very significant study. The authors concluded that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a safer solvent in brine shrimp lethality bioassay and the maximum working concentration of solvents such as DMSO, methanol and Tween 20 was suggested. One conclusion from this article is that Tween 20 showed the most cytotoxicity in brine shrimp lethality bioassay. Tween 20 is a detergent, which can help to dissolve natural products contains oil. Detergents have long alkyl chains and water-soluble functional groups. Hence they are water-soluble and are able to dissolve hydrophobic compounds with their alkyl chains. They are called surface-acting agents. Commonly used detergents include sodium dodecyl sulfate, Tween 20, CHAPS and etc., But these detergents are in general toxic in vitro and in vivo. The may denature proteins and inhibit biological processes. So to overcome this problem, it is important to discover new detergents with lower toxicity for brine shrimp lethality bioassay and other bioassays. New low toxicity surface-acting agents were developed in the past several decades. One of them is Nikkol. It has been used in a membrane protein research in which the proteins were dissolved with the help of Nikkol, but still maintains a native-like state. Nikkol is a nonionic detergent and showed low toxicity. This may be a promising new solvent can be used in brine shrimp lethality bioassay.[7] Another aspect of brine shrimp lethality bioassay is the proper design of experiments. As many other medical researches, organic chemicals are generally used as drug vehicles or carriers in brine shrimp lethality bioassay. However, these compounds often have toxicity or even the pleiotropy in vitro or in vivo.[8] Hence researches must be aware of their desirable or undesirable effects and proper control experiments should be carefully designed. Otherwise, bias may introduced in bioassays and effect of solvents can be attributed to the tested medicine falsely. In brine shrimp lethality bioassay, both positive and negative groups should be designed. Especially the negative group, which should contain the some percentage of solvent as in the test groups, should be planed carefully. And the effect of the solvent only should be deducted from the test data. In summary, solvent is a very important player in brine shrimp lethality bioassay. The maximum working concentration of solvents in brine shrimp lethality bioassay contributes significantly to the field. Development of new solvents and detergents and carefully design of experiments will also improve this assay greatly.
  7 in total

1.  Artemia salina as a Test Organism for Bioassay.

Authors:  A S Michael; C G Thompson; M Abramovitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The use of Artemia nauplii for toxicity tests--a critical analysis.

Authors:  P Sorgeloos; C Remiche-Van Der Wielen; G Persoone
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Mapping the ends of transmembrane segments in a polytopic membrane protein. Scanning N-glycosylation mutagenesis of extracytosolic loops in the anion exchanger, band 3.

Authors:  M Popov; L Y Tam; J Li; R A Reithmeier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Brine shrimp bioassay and seawater BOD of petrochemicals.

Authors:  K S Price; G T Waggy; R A Conway
Journal:  J Water Pollut Control Fed       Date:  1974-01

5.  Toxicity and excretion of ochratoxin A in rats intubated with pure ochratoxin A or fed cultures of Penicillium viridicatum.

Authors:  W Van Walbeek; C A Moodie; P M Scott; J Harwig; H C Grice
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Proposal for a short-term toxicity test with Artemia nauplii.

Authors:  P Vanhaecke; G Persoone; C Claus; P Sorgeloos
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Brine shrimp (Artemia salina L.) larvae as a screening system for fungal toxins.

Authors:  J Harwig; P M Scott
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-06
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  DNA interaction, in vivo and in vitro cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation of -N, S donor Re(I) metal complexes.

Authors:  Reena R Varma; Juhee G Pandya; Jyoti Sharma; Chandramani Pathak; Mohan N Patel
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Polarity directed optimization of phytochemical and in vitro biological potential of an indigenous folklore: Quercus dilatata Lindl. ex Royle.

Authors:  Madiha Ahmed; Humaira Fatima; Muhammad Qasim; Bilquees Gul
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 3.  Cytotoxic Compounds Derived from Marine Sponges. A Review (2010-2012).

Authors:  Roberto Mioso; Francisco J Toledo Marante; Ranilson de Souza Bezerra; Flávio Valadares Pereira Borges; Bárbara V de Oliveira Santos; Irma Herrera Bravo de Laguna
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Screening of antibiofilm and anti-quorum sensing activty of Actinomycetes isolates extracts against aquaculture pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Gloria Raissa; Diana Elizabeth Waturangi; Dinamella Wahjuningrum
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Bacteriocins: An Overview of Antimicrobial, Toxicity, and Biosafety Assessment by in vivo Models.

Authors:  Diego Francisco Benítez-Chao; Angel León-Buitimea; Jordy Alexis Lerma-Escalera; José Rubén Morones-Ramírez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Bioinspired gelatin based sticky hydrogel for diverse surfaces in burn wound care.

Authors:  Benu George; Nitish Bhatia; Abhitinder Kumar; Gnanamani A; Thilagam R; Shanuja S K; Kannan Vadakkadath Meethal; Shiji T M; Suchithra T V
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.