Literature DB >> 24696552

Detection of AmpC β Lactamases in Gram-negative Bacteria.

Gunjan Gupta1, Vibhor Tak1, Purva Mathur1.   

Abstract

AmpC β-lactamases are clinically important cephalosporinases encoded on the chromosomes of many Enterobacteriaceae and a few other organisms, where they mediate resistance to cephalothin, cefazolin, cefoxitin, most penicillins, and β-lactamase inhibitor/β-lactam combinations. The increase in antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria is a notable example of how bacteria can procure, maintain and express new genetic information that can confer resistance to one or several antibiotics. Detection of organisms producing these enzymes can be difficult, because their presence does not always produce a resistant phenotype on conventional disc diffusion or automated susceptibility testing methods. These enzymes are often associated with potentially fatal laboratory reports of false susceptibility to β-lactams phenotypically. With the world-wide increase in the occurrence, types and rate of dissemination of these enzymes, their early detection is critical. AmpC β-lactamases show tremendous variation in geographic distribution. Thus, their accurate detection and characterization are important from epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and infection control point of view. This document describes the methods for detection for AmpC β-lactamases, which can be adopted by routine diagnostic laboratories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AmpC β-lactamases; disk approximation test; gram-negative bacteria; three-dimensional extract test

Year:  2014        PMID: 24696552      PMCID: PMC3969634          DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.129082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Physicians        ISSN: 0974-2727


INTRODUCTION

Drug resistance poses a therapeutic problem not only in the hospital settings, but also in the community as most of the bacteria have acquired resistance to multiple antibiotics.[12] The various mechanisms of drug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria include extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) production, AmpC β-lactamase production, efflux mechanism and porin deficiency. In the clinical laboratory settings, the commonly detected enzymes causing resistance are AmpC β-lactamases and ESBLs. Clinical relevance of AmpC β-lactamases lies in the fact that they confer resistance to both narrow and broad spectrum cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and aztreonam.[3] AmpC β-lactamases can be chromosomally or plasmid mediated. The plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases hydrolyze all β-lactam antibiotics except cefepime and carbapenems. The plasmid-mediated AmpC genes are derived from inducible chromosomal genes that have been mobilized among various organisms. The commonly reported genotypes are ACC, FOX, MOX, DHA, CMY, CIT and EBC.[456] These mobilized plasmid mediated enzymes confer a resistance pattern similar to the overproduction of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases, which also involve all β-lactam antibiotics except for carbapenems and cefepime.[7] Detection of AmpC is important to improve the clinical management of patients suffering from infections and would also provide us with sound epidemiological data. However, there are no Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for detection of AmpC mediated resistance in Gram-negative clinical isolates and hence, it usually poses a problem due to misleading results, especially so in phenotypic tests.[8]

Personnel qualifications

The test performer should be having a diploma in laboratory technologies and preferably university graduate in biological sciences with sufficient experience.

Education and training

Personnel are required to be knowledgeable of the procedures in the microbiology laboratory. The laboratory staff should confirm that they can properly perform the procedures before commencing work. The details are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Education and training must be given on the following topics

Education and training must be given on the following topics

PROCEDURE

Techniques to identify AmpC β-lactamase-producing isolates are available but are still evolving and are not yet optimized for the clinical laboratory, which leads to the underestimation of these resistance mechanisms. Carbapenems can usually be used to treat infections due to AmpC-producing bacteria, but carbapenem resistance can arise in some organisms by mutations that reduce influx (outer membrane porin loss) or enhance efflux (efflux pump activation).

REQUIREMENTS

The list of all the requirements are given in Table 2.
Table 2

List of all the requirements for performing the test

List of all the requirements for performing the test

Isolates

Gram-negative bacterial isolates recovered from clinical samples.

Preparation of reagents and chemicals

300 μg phenylboronic acid Weigh 150 mg phenylboronic acid and dissolve in 10 ml sterile distilled water Use it as 15 μg/μl stock Store at 4°C 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer Weigh 18.6 g EDTA and add distilled water to 90 ml Adjust pH to 8.0 Add distilled water and make final volume 100 ml Store at 4°C Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer 50X TE (stock solution) Weigh 121 g Tris base and dissolve in 400 ml distilled water Add 50 ml 0.5 M EDTA Add distilled water and make final volume 500 ml Store at 4°C TE buffer (working) Dilute 50X master stock to 1X with distilled water. Primer reconstitution. Primers are often shipped and received in a lyophilized state. First create a master 100X stock (for each primer and then dilute it to a 20X working stock). Master stock, 100 μM 100 μM = X nmoles lyophilized primer + (X × 10 μl molecular grade H2O) To determine the amount of H2O to add to the lyophilized primer simply multiply the number of nmol of primer in the tube by 10 and that will be the amount of H2O to add to make a 100 μM primer stock Vortex tube and incubate at room temperature for 10 min. Working stock, 20 μM Dilute the primer master stock in a sterile microcentrifuge tube 1:5 with molecular grade H2O.

TEST PROCEDURE

What is unnecessary?

It is unnecessary to detect AmpC production in organisms that produce an inducible chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase because the organism identification is indicative of AmpC production; i.e. 100% isolates of Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Providencia sp., Morganella morganii, Hafnia alvei, Aeromonas sp., and P. aeruginosa can be assumed to be AmpC producers. Detection of an AmpC β-lactamase in Klebsiella sp., Citrobacter koseri or Proteus mirabilis is confirmatory for plasmid-mediated AmpC production because these organisms lack a chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases.[910]

Screening

Requirement Test organism Normal saline Blood agar plates Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates 30-μg cefoxitin disk Procedure Make 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension in normal saline prepared from an overnight blood agar plate Inoculate surface of MHA plate with this suspension by swabbing Place 30-μg cefoxitin disk on inoculated MHA Invert the plate and incubate overnight at 35°C Plate reading and interpretation After overnight incubation measure zone diameter around 30-μg cefoxitin disk Select the isolates with zone diameters less than 18 mm for confirmation of AmpC production.

Phenotypic confirmatory tests

Three-dimensional extract test

Requirement Test organism Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 or E. coli ATCC 11775 Normal saline Blood agar plates MHA plates 12 ml brain heart infusion (BHI) broth 30-μg cefoxitin disk Sterile blade Procedure Prepare 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension from an overnight blood agar plate Inoculate 12 ml BHI broth with 50 μl of 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension and incubate for 4 h at 37°C Concentrate cells by centrifugation and freeze-thaw 5 times to prepare crude enzyme Prepare 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension using one of two E. coli ATCC 25922 or ATCC 11775 and inoculate surface of MHA plate by using this suspension Place 30-μg cefoxitin disk on the inoculated agar plate With a sterile scalpel blade, cut a slit beginning 5 mm from the edge of the disk in an outward radial direction By using a pipette, dispense 25-30 μl of enzyme preparation into the slit, beginning near the disk and moving outward, avoiding slit overfill Incubate inoculated media overnight at 37°C Plate reading and interpretation After overnight incubation check the enhanced growth of the surface organism at the point where the slit intersected If there is a zone of inhibition of surface organism, the test is positive three-dimensional test [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Representation of three dimensional extract test. (a) Zone of inhibition showing positive test, (b) no zone of inhibition showing negative test. *30 μg cefoxitin disk

Representation of three dimensional extract test. (a) Zone of inhibition showing positive test, (b) no zone of inhibition showing negative test. *30 μg cefoxitin disk

AmpC disk test

Requirements AmpC disks (filter paper disks containing TE) 30 μg cefoxitin disk Blood agar plates MHA plates Test organisms E. coli ATCC 25922 Normal saline Procedure Prepare 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension of E. coli ATCC 25922 Inoculate surface of MHA plate using this suspension as per standard disk diffusion method Immediately prior to use, rehydrate AmpC disk with 20 μl of saline and several colonies of each test organism apply to a disk Place a 30 μg cefoxitin disk on the inoculated surface of the MHA Place inoculated AmpC disk almost touching the antibiotic disk with the inoculated disk face in contact with the agar surface Invert the plate and incubate overnight at 35°C in ambient air Plate reading and interpretation After overnight incubation, examine the plate for either an indentation or a flattening of the zone of inhibition If there is any zone of inhibition, it indicates enzymatic inactivation of cefoxitin (positive result) If no zone inhibition, indicates no significant inactivation of cefoxitin (negative result) [Figure 2].
Figure 2

Representation of AmpC disk test. (a) Zone of inhibition showing positive test results, (b) no zone of inhibition showing negative test results, *AmpC disks (filter paper containing tris-EDTA), CX: 30μg cefoxifin disks

Representation of AmpC disk test. (a) Zone of inhibition showing positive test results, (b) no zone of inhibition showing negative test results, *AmpC disks (filter paper containing tris-EDTA), CX: 30μg cefoxifin disks

Boronic acid disk test method

Requirements Test organism 30 μg cefoxitin disk Phenylboronic acid MHA plates. Procedure Prepare 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension from an overnight blood agar plate Inoculate surface of MHA plate using this suspension as per standard disk diffusion method Place a 30 μg cefoxitin disk on the inoculated surface of the MHA Using sterile tips, dispense 20 μl of 15 μg/ml phenylboronic acid onto the disk Let the disk absorb it Invert the plate and incubate overnight at 35°C. Plate reading and interpretation After overnight incubation, compare the zone diameter around the antibiotic disk with added boronic acid and the antibiotic-containing disk alone An organism that demonstrates a defined increase (≥5-mm) in zone diameter around the antibiotic disk with added boronic acid consider to be an AmpC producer [Figure 3].[5]
Figure 3

Representation of boronic acid disk test. A: 30 μg cefoxitin disk supplemented with 300μg of phenyl boronic acid. B: 30 μg cofoxitin disk alone

Representation of boronic acid disk test. A: 30 μg cefoxitin disk supplemented with 300μg of phenyl boronic acid. B: 30 μg cofoxitin disk alone

Disk approximation test

Requirements Test organism Normal saline 10 μg imipenem disk 30 μg cefoxitin disk 20/10 μg amoxicillin-clavulanate disk 30 μg ceftazidime disk MHA Plates Procedure Prepare 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension from an overnight blood agar plate Inoculate surface of MHA plate using this suspension as per standard disk diffusion method Place a 30 μg ceftazidime disk at the center on the plate Place 10 μg imipenem, 30 μg cefoxitin, and 20/10 μg amoxicillin-clavulanate disks at a distance of 20 mm from ceftazidime disk Invert the plate and incubate overnight at 35°C Plate reading and interpretation After overnight incubation, examine the plate for any obvious blunting or flattening of the zone of inhibition between the ceftazidime disk and the inducing substrates (imipenem, cefoxitin and amoxicillin-clavulanate disk) If there is any blunting or flattening of the zone, consider as a positive result for AmpC production [Figure 4].
Figure 4

Representation of disk approximation test. Flattening of zone of ceftazidime toward imipenem disk (inducing substrate) showing positive result. IMP: Imipenem (10 μg), CAZ: Ceftazidime (10 μg), AMC: Amoxillin-clavulanate (20/10 μg)

Representation of disk approximation test. Flattening of zone of ceftazidime toward imipenem disk (inducing substrate) showing positive result. IMP: Imipenem (10 μg), CAZ: Ceftazidime (10 μg), AMC: Amoxillin-clavulanate (20/10 μg)

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for plasmid mediated AmpC genes

Phenotypic tests do not differentiate between chromosomal and plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases. Plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases are most accurately detected with the multiplex AmpC PCR test.

Preparation of template deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)

Requirements Test organism Molecular biology grade water Microcentrifuge tubes Absolute ethanol DNA extraction kit Procedure Inoculate a single colony of each organism into 5 ml of Luria-Bertani broth and incubate for 20 h at 37°C with shaking Harvest cells from 1.5 ml of the overnight culture by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min Discard supernatant, re-suspend the pellet in 500 μl of distilled water Extract total DNA by using DNA extraction kit according to manufacturer's instructions Quantify total DNA prior to the multiplex PCR using spectrophotometer

Multiplex PCR

Requirements 0.5-ml thin-walled PCR tubes Molecular biology grade water Taq DNA polymerase (5U/μl) 10X Taq buffer with KCL Tris-HCl (pH 8.4) 25 mM MgCl2 DNTPS 10Mm Procedure Make a master mix containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4); 50 mM KCl; 0.2 mM each dNTPs; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.6 μM primers MOXMF, MOXMR, CITMF, CITMR, DHAMF, and DHAMR; 0.5 μM primers ACCMF, ACCMR, EBCMF, and EBCMR; 0.4 μM primers FOXMF and FOXMR; and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Add 2 µl DNA template. The list of all the primers are given in Table 3.
Table 3

Primers for amplification of AmpC genes

Set the PCR program on an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of DNA denaturation at 94°C for 30s, primer annealing at 64°C for 30s, and primer extension at 72°C for 1 min. After the last cycle, a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min Set the tube in the PCR machine and run the program. Primers for amplification of AmpC genes

Electrophoresis

Requirements Agarose Ethidium bromide Loading die 100-bp DNA ladder Procedure Prepare 2% agarose gel in 1X TE buffer Analyze 5 μl PCR product mixed with 1 μl 6X loading die Use 100-bp DNA ladder as a marker Stain gel with ethidium bromide (10 μg/ml) and analyze the presence of bands in ultraviolet transilluminator Use the PCR mixtures with the addition of water in place of template DNA as negative control.

Plate disposal

Keep all culture plates sealed inside blue plastic bags and seal in an autoclave bag Autoclave at 121°C for 30 min Discard the sealed sterilized bags in the site designed for this purpose.
  9 in total

1.  Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Pérez; Nancy D Hanson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  AmpC beta-lactamases: what do we need to know for the future?

Authors:  Nancy D Hanson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  A simple phenotypic method for differentiation between acquired and chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Beatriz Mirelis; Alba Rivera; Elisenda Miró; Raúl J Mesa; Ferran Navarro; Pere Coll
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase, AmpC, and Carbapenemase issues.

Authors:  Kenneth S Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Increasing antimicrobial resistance and narrowing therapeutics in typhoidal salmonellae.

Authors:  Jaspal Kaurthe
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  Evaluation of phenotypic tests for the detection of AmpC beta-lactamase in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Deepika Handa; Anita Pandey; Ashish Kumar Asthana; Ashutosh Rawat; Seemant Handa; Bhaskar Thakuria
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.740

Review 7.  Three decades of beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Authors:  Sarah M Drawz; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Novel plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase (MIR-1) conferring resistance to oxyimino- and alpha-methoxy beta-lactams in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  G A Papanicolaou; A A Medeiros; G A Jacoby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Communicating trends in resistance using a drug resistance index.

Authors:  Ramanan Laxminarayan; Keith P Klugman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  Genomic Analysis Identifies Novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa Resistance Genes under Selection during Inhaled Aztreonam Therapy In Vivo.

Authors:  Kathryn McLean; Duankun Lee; Elizabeth A Holmes; Kelsi Penewit; Adam Waalkes; Mingxin Ren; Samuel A Lee; Joseph Gasper; Colin Manoil; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Multiplex PCR to detect pAmpC β-lactamases among enterobacteriaceae at a tertiary care laboratory in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Mubin Kazi; Kanchan Ajbani; Jeffrey A Tornheim; Anjali Shetty; Camilla Rodrigues
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Phenotypic Identification and Genotypic Characterization of Plasmid-Mediated AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Iran.

Authors:  Saeedeh Robatjazi; Farhad Nikkhahi; Mojtaba Niazadeh; Seyed Mahmoud Amin Marashi; Amir Peymani; Amir Javadi; Amir Hossein Kashani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Detection and genotype analysis of AmpC β-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae from tertiary hospitals.

Authors:  Xiang-Qun Liu; Yong-Rui Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Gut microbiota profiling in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  J S Gill; S P Singh; Sanjeevan Sharma; Ashwini Agarwal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2019-10-16

6.  Comparative genomic analysis of Klebsiella pneumonia (LCT-KP214) and a mutant strain (LCT-KP289) obtained after spaceflight.

Authors:  Yinghua Guo; Yinhu Li; Longxiang Su; De Chang; Wenbin Liu; Tong Wang; Yanting Yuan; Xiangqun Fang; Junfeng Wang; Tianzhi Li; Chengxiang Fang; Wenkui Dai; Changting Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  A locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based real-time PCR assay for the rapid detection of multiple bacterial antibiotic resistance genes directly from positive blood culture.

Authors:  Lingxiang Zhu; Dingxia Shen; Qiming Zhou; Zexia Li; Xiangdong Fang; Quan-Zhen Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Computational and biological profile of boronic acids for the detection of bacterial serine- and metallo-β-lactamases.

Authors:  Matteo Santucci; Francesca Spyrakis; Simon Cross; Antonio Quotadamo; Davide Farina; Donatella Tondi; Filomena De Luca; Jean-Denis Docquier; Ana Isabel Prieto; Claudia Ibacache; Jesús Blázquez; Alberto Venturelli; Gabriele Cruciani; Maria Paola Costi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Subtyping β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with UTI by MLVA and PFGE methods.

Authors:  Alireza Dolatyar Dehkharghani; Setareh Haghighat; Marjan Rahnamaye Farzami; Masoumeh Douraghi; Mohammad Rahbar
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.699

10.  Clonal Relationship and Resistance Profiles Among ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Alireza Dolatyar Dehkharghani; Setareh Haghighat; Marjan Rahnamaye Farzami; Mohammad Rahbar; Masoumeh Douraghi
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.