RATIONALE: Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the world, and regular use has been associated with reduced motivation, i.e. apathy. Regular long-term cannabis use has been associated with reduced dopamine synthesis capacity. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system mediates the processing of incentive stimuli by modifying their motivational value, which in turn is modulated by endocannabinoid signalling. Thus, it has been proposed that dopaminergic dysfunction underlies the apathy associated with chronic cannabis use. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between dopaminergic function and subjective apathy in cannabis users. METHODS: We measured dopamine synthesis capacity (indexed as the influx rate constant K i(cer)) via 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine positron emission tomography and subjective apathy using the self-rated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-S) in 14 regular cannabis users. RESULTS: All subjects scored in excess of 34 points on the AES-S (median [interquartile range] 59.5 [7.5]), indicative of significant apathy based on normative data. K i (cer) was inversely correlated to AES-S score in the whole striatum and its associative functional subdivision (Spearman's rho = -0.64, p = 0.015 [whole striatum]; rho = -0.69, p = 0.006 [associative]) but not in the limbic or sensorimotor striatal subdivisions. There were no significant relationships between AES-S and current cannabis consumption (rho = 0.28, p = 0.34) or age of first cannabis use (rho = 0.25, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the reduction in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity associated with chronic cannabis use may underlie reduced reward sensitivity and a motivation associated with chronic cannabis use.
RATIONALE: Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the world, and regular use has been associated with reduced motivation, i.e. apathy. Regular long-term cannabis use has been associated with reduced dopamine synthesis capacity. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system mediates the processing of incentive stimuli by modifying their motivational value, which in turn is modulated by endocannabinoid signalling. Thus, it has been proposed that dopaminergic dysfunction underlies the apathy associated with chronic cannabis use. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between dopaminergic function and subjective apathy in cannabis users. METHODS: We measured dopamine synthesis capacity (indexed as the influx rate constant K i(cer)) via 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine positron emission tomography and subjective apathy using the self-rated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-S) in 14 regular cannabis users. RESULTS: All subjects scored in excess of 34 points on the AES-S (median [interquartile range] 59.5 [7.5]), indicative of significant apathy based on normative data. K i (cer) was inversely correlated to AES-S score in the whole striatum and its associative functional subdivision (Spearman's rho = -0.64, p = 0.015 [whole striatum]; rho = -0.69, p = 0.006 [associative]) but not in the limbic or sensorimotor striatal subdivisions. There were no significant relationships between AES-S and current cannabis consumption (rho = 0.28, p = 0.34) or age of first cannabis use (rho = 0.25, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the reduction in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity associated with chronic cannabis use may underlie reduced reward sensitivity and a motivation associated with chronic cannabis use.
Authors: P Hartvig; R Torstenson; J Tedroff; Y Watanabe; K J Fasth; P Bjurling; B Långström Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 1997 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Jana Wrase; Florian Schlagenhauf; Thorsten Kienast; Torsten Wüstenberg; Felix Bermpohl; Thorsten Kahnt; Anne Beck; Andreas Ströhle; Georg Juckel; Brian Knutson; Andreas Heinz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mason M Silveira; Jonathon C Arnold; Steven R Laviolette; Cecilia J Hillard; Marta Celorrio; María S Aymerich; Wendy K Adams Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Sarah D Lichenstein; Samuel Musselman; Daniel S Shaw; Stephanie Sitnick; Erika E Forbes Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 6.526