INTRODUCTION: In response to the need for simple, rapid means of quantifying surgical capacity in low resource settings, Surgeons OverSeas (SOS) developed the personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment and supplies (PIPES) tool. The present investigation assessed the inter-rater reliability of the PIPES tool. METHODS: As part of a government assessment of surgical services in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, the PIPES tool was translated into Spanish and applied in interviews with physicians at 31 public hospitals. An additional interview was conducted with nurses at a convenience sample of 25 of these hospitals. Physician and nurse responses were then compared to generate an estimate of reliability. For dichotomous survey items, inter-rater reliability between physicians and nurses was assessed using the Cohen's kappa statistic and percent agreement. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement for continuous items. RESULTS: Cohen's kappa was 0.46 for infrastructure, 0.43 for procedures, 0.26 for equipment, and 0 for supplies sections. The median correlation coefficient was 0.91 for continuous items. Correlation was 0.79 for the PIPES index, and ranged from 0.32 to 0.98 for continuous response items. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the PIPES tool was moderate for the infrastructure and procedures sections, fair for the equipment section, and poor for supplies section when comparing surgeons' responses to nurses' responses-an extremely rigorous test of reliability. These results indicate that the PIPES tool is an effective measure of surgical capacity but that the equipment and supplies sections may need to be revised.
INTRODUCTION: In response to the need for simple, rapid means of quantifying surgical capacity in low resource settings, Surgeons OverSeas (SOS) developed the personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment and supplies (PIPES) tool. The present investigation assessed the inter-rater reliability of the PIPES tool. METHODS: As part of a government assessment of surgical services in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, the PIPES tool was translated into Spanish and applied in interviews with physicians at 31 public hospitals. An additional interview was conducted with nurses at a convenience sample of 25 of these hospitals. Physician and nurse responses were then compared to generate an estimate of reliability. For dichotomous survey items, inter-rater reliability between physicians and nurses was assessed using the Cohen's kappa statistic and percent agreement. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement for continuous items. RESULTS: Cohen's kappa was 0.46 for infrastructure, 0.43 for procedures, 0.26 for equipment, and 0 for supplies sections. The median correlation coefficient was 0.91 for continuous items. Correlation was 0.79 for the PIPES index, and ranged from 0.32 to 0.98 for continuous response items. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the PIPES tool was moderate for the infrastructure and procedures sections, fair for the equipment section, and poor for supplies section when comparing surgeons' responses to nurses' responses-an extremely rigorous test of reliability. These results indicate that the PIPES tool is an effective measure of surgical capacity but that the equipment and supplies sections may need to be revised.
Authors: Reinou S Groen; Thaim B Kamara; Richmond Dixon-Cole; Steven Kwon; T Peter Kingham; Adam L Kushner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Abraham Markin; Roxana Barbero; Jeffrey J Leow; Reinou S Groen; Evan J Skow; Keith N Apelgren; Adam L Kushner; Benedict C Nwomeh Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Hayley Osen; David Chang; Shelly Choo; Henry Perry; Afua Hesse; Francis Abantanga; Colin McCord; Kristin Chrouser; Fizan Abdullah Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Sam Luboga; Sarah B Macfarlane; Johan von Schreeb; Margaret E Kruk; Meena N Cherian; Staffan Bergström; Paul B M Bossyns; Ernest Denerville; Delanyo Dovlo; Moses Galukande; Renee Y Hsia; Sudha P Jayaraman; Lindsey A Lubbock; Charles Mock; Doruk Ozgediz; Patrick Sekimpi; Andreas Wladis; Ahmed Zakariah; Naméoua Babadi Dade; Peter Donkor; Jane Kabutu Gatumbu; Patrick Hoekman; Carel B Ijsselmuiden; Dean T Jamison; Nasreen Jessani; Peter Jiskoot; Ignatius Kakande; Jacqueline R Mabweijano; Naboth Mbembati; Colin McCord; Cephas Mijumbi; Helder de Miranda; Charles A Mkony; Pascoal Mocumbi; Jean Bosco Ndihokubwayo; Pierre Ngueumachi; Gebreamlak Ogbaselassie; Evariste Lodi Okitombahe; Cheikh Tidiane Toure; Fernando Vaz; Charlotte M Zikusooka; Haile T Debas Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Kathleen M O'Neill; Sarah L M Greenberg; Meena Cherian; Rowan D Gillies; Kimberly M Daniels; Nobhojit Roy; Nakul P Raykar; Johanna N Riesel; David Spiegel; David A Watters; Russell L Gruen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.352