Katherine A Muldoon1, Putu K Duff1, Josephine Birungi2, Moses H Ngolobe2, Jeong Eun Min3, Rachel King4, Maureen Nyonyintono2, Yalin Chen3, Kate Shannon5, Sarah Khanakwa2, David Moore6. 1. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. The AIDS Support Organisation, Kampala, Uganda. 3. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. University of California, San Francisco, California, USA Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 6. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined sexual decision making type among couples in HIV sero-discordant partnerships in Uganda, and investigated how sexual decision making type changed over time and its effect on condom use. METHODS: Data were drawn from a longitudinal cohort of HIV sero-discordant couples, recruited through the AIDS Support Organisation in Jinja, Uganda. Sexual decision making was measured using the Sexual Relationship Power Scale, and couples' individual self-report answers were matched to assess agreement for decision making type and condom use. Generalised linear mixed effects modelling was used to assess statistically significant differences in time trend of sexual decision making type, and to investigate the independent association of decision making type on condom use status over time. RESULTS: Of the 533 couples included in this analysis, 345 (65%) reported using condoms at last sex at study enrolment. In the time trend analysis of decision making, the proportion of couples who decided together increased over time while the proportions of couples who reported that one partner decided or no one decided/did not use condoms, decreased over time (overall p<0.001). Compared with couples who decided together, those who disagreed (adjusted OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.64) and those where one partner decided (adjusted OR=0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34) had significantly lower odds of condom use at last sex, even after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Couples who disagreed on decision making, or agreed that one partner decides alone, had significantly lower odds of reporting condom use compared with couples who decided together. HIV counselling interventions that encourage joint sexual decision making may improve condom use within this population. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: We examined sexual decision making type among couples in HIV sero-discordant partnerships in Uganda, and investigated how sexual decision making type changed over time and its effect on condom use. METHODS: Data were drawn from a longitudinal cohort of HIV sero-discordant couples, recruited through the AIDS Support Organisation in Jinja, Uganda. Sexual decision making was measured using the Sexual Relationship Power Scale, and couples' individual self-report answers were matched to assess agreement for decision making type and condom use. Generalised linear mixed effects modelling was used to assess statistically significant differences in time trend of sexual decision making type, and to investigate the independent association of decision making type on condom use status over time. RESULTS: Of the 533 couples included in this analysis, 345 (65%) reported using condoms at last sex at study enrolment. In the time trend analysis of decision making, the proportion of couples who decided together increased over time while the proportions of couples who reported that one partner decided or no one decided/did not use condoms, decreased over time (overall p<0.001). Compared with couples who decided together, those who disagreed (adjusted OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.64) and those where one partner decided (adjusted OR=0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34) had significantly lower odds of condom use at last sex, even after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Couples who disagreed on decision making, or agreed that one partner decides alone, had significantly lower odds of reporting condom use compared with couples who decided together. HIV counselling interventions that encourage joint sexual decision making may improve condom use within this population. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Communication Skills; Condoms; Gender; HIV; Sexual Behaviour
Authors: Hazar Khidir; Nzwakie Mosery; Ross Greener; Cecilia Milford; Kara Bennett; Angela Kaida; Christina Psaros; Steve A Safren; David R Bangsberg; Jennifer A Smit; Lynn T Matthews Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-03
Authors: Elianna T Kaplowitz; Kevin P Fiori; Molly E Lauria; Sesso Gbeleou; Agnés Miziou; Etonam Sowu; Jennifer Schechter; Heidi E Jones Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2020-07
Authors: Elizabeth K Harrington; Shari Dworkin; Mellissa Withers; Maricianah Onono; Zachary Kwena; Sara J Newmann Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2015-10-26
Authors: Elizabeth M Irungu; Kenneth Ngure; Kenneth K Mugwanya; Merceline Awuor; Annabelle Dollah; Fernandos Ongolly; Nelly Mugo; Elizabeth Bukusi; Elizabeth Wamoni; Josephine Odoyo; Jennifer F Morton; Gena Barnabee; Irene Mukui; Jared M Baeten; Gabrielle O'Malley Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2020-03-24
Authors: Rachel King; Jeong Min; Josephine Birungi; Maureen Nyonyintono; Katherine A Muldoon; Sarah Khanakwa; Pontiano Kaleebu; David M Moore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240