Literature DB >> 24695929

Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009.

Akhila Balasubramanian1, Laura L Tosi2, Joseph M Lane3, Douglas R Dirschl4, Pei-Ran Ho5, Cynthia D O'Malley6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice recommendations state that patients with fragility fractures should be evaluated for osteoporosis and treated for the disease if it is present. The purpose of this study was to assess osteoporosis evaluation and treatment patterns for patients with fragility fractures and assess whether anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy initiated immediately following a fragility fracture is associated with improved adherence to the treatment protocol.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved data from a large commercially insured population seen in the period from 2001 through 2009. Patients were community-dwelling individuals aged fifty years or older who had a new low-energy fracture at the hip, vertebra, wrist, or humerus with no evidence of a fragility fracture, osteoporosis treatment, malignant disease, or Paget disease for twelve months preceding the fracture. Rates of diagnostic testing and pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis within twelve months post-fracture were evaluated. Patients treated with oral bisphosphonates were evaluated to determine whether twelve-month adherence to the treatment protocol differed between those who had initiated therapy sooner (at zero to ninety days) and those who initiated it later (at ninety-one to 365 days) following the fracture.
RESULTS: The 88,571 women and 41,984 men had an average age of 72.3 years and 70.5 years, respectively. Nineteen percent (16,464) of the women and 10% (4014) of the men initiated osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, and 30% (26,481) of the women and 15% (6427) of the men underwent diagnostic testing and/or pharmacotherapy following fracture. Treatment rates were highest following vertebral fracture and lowest following wrist or humeral fracture. Treatment rates significantly decreased over time (from 2001 through 2009). The average twelve-month adherence (medication possession ratio) was 56% and 61% among women and men, respectively. Adherence was similar between patients who had initiated treatment sooner after the fracture and those who had initiated it later after the fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical guidelines for evaluation and treatment following fragility fracture were met for less than one-third of women and less than one-sixth of men. While primary fracture prevention remains the ideal, secondary prevention is critical and there is a need to reverse the downward trend in adherence to post-fracture guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695929     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  35 in total

1.  Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Use of osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a cross-national study.

Authors:  Seoyoung C Kim; Mi-Sook Kim; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Hong Ji Song; Jun Liu; Isabel Hurtado; Salvador Peiró; Joongyub Lee; Nam-Kyong Choi; Byung-Joo Park; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  International Geriatric Fracture Society CORE Certification: Turning Knowledge into Action.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Michael Suk; Fraser Cobbe; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Geriatric hip fracture management: keys to providing a successful program.

Authors:  N Basu; M Natour; V Mounasamy; S L Kates
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Working to Increase Stability through Exercise (WISE): Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a coached exercise program to reduce serious fall-related injuries.

Authors:  Christopher Sciamanna; Noel H Ballentine; Melissa Bopp; Jennifer S Brach; Vernon M Chinchilli; Joseph T Ciccolo; Molly B Conroy; Abigail Fisher; Edward J Fox; Susan L Greenspan; M Jan De Beur Suzanne; Kalen Kearcher; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kathleen M McTigue; Edward McAuley; Natalia E Morone; Anuradha Paranjape; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Andrew Rosenzweig; Joshua M Smyth; Kerry J Stewart; Heather L Stuckey
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  C-H Wu; I-J Kao; W-C Hung; S-C Lin; H-C Liu; M-H Hsieh; S Bagga; M Achra; T-T Cheng; R-S Yang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A pilot randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with tailored fracture risk tool delivered via a patient portal.

Authors:  A J Smallwood; M M Schapira; M Fedders; J M Neuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A model of health education and management for osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Xiaowen Xu; Yan Zhang; Hongxia Hao; Liying Chen; Tianjiao Su; Yan Zhang; Weifeng Ma; Yuanyuan Xie; Tiantian Wang; Fan Yang; Li He; Wenjiao Wang; Xuemei Fu; Yuanzheng Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Martin; M Viprey; B Castagne; B Merle; C Giroudon; R Chapurlat; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.