Literature DB >> 24695194

No difference in variability of unique hue selections and binary hue selections.

J M Bosten, A J Lawrance-Owen.   

Abstract

If unique hues have special status in phenomenological experience as perceptually pure, it seems reasonable to assume that they are represented more precisely by the visual system than are other colors. Following the method of Malkoc et al. (J. Opt. Soc. Am. A22, 2154 [2005]), we gathered unique and binary hue selections from 50 subjects. For these subjects we repeated the measurements in two separate sessions, allowing us to measure test-retest reliabilities (0.52≤ρ≤0.78; p≪0.01). We quantified the within-individual variability for selections of each hue. Adjusting for the differences in variability intrinsic to different regions of chromaticity space, we compared the within-individual variability for unique hues to that for binary hues. Surprisingly, we found that selections of unique hues did not show consistently lower variability than selections of binary hues. We repeated hue measurements in a single session for an independent sample of 58 subjects, using a different relative scaling of the cardinal axes of MacLeod-Boynton chromaticity space. Again, we found no consistent difference in adjusted within-individual variability for selections of unique and binary hues. Our finding does not depend on the particular scaling chosen for the Y axis of MacLeod-Boynton chromaticity space.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695194     DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.00A357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  7 in total

1.  What is white?

Authors:  J M Bosten; R D Beer; D I A MacLeod
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Compensation for red-green contrast loss in anomalous trichromats.

Authors:  A E Boehm; D I A MacLeod; J M Bosten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Color naming across languages reflects color use.

Authors:  Edward Gibson; Richard Futrell; Julian Jara-Ettinger; Kyle Mahowald; Leon Bergen; Sivalogeswaran Ratnasingam; Mitchell Gibson; Steven T Piantadosi; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Communication efficiency of color naming across languages provides a new framework for the evolution of color terms.

Authors:  Bevil R Conway; Sivalogeswaran Ratnasingam; Julian Jara-Ettinger; Richard Futrell; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-12

5.  Variations in normal color vision. VI. Factors underlying individual differences in hue scaling and their implications for models of color appearance.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Testing the Cross-Cultural Generality of Hering's Theory of Color Appearance.

Authors:  Delwin T Lindsey; Angela M Brown; Ryan Lange
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11

7.  A neural signature of the unique hues.

Authors:  Lewis Forder; Jenny Bosten; Xun He; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.