Literature DB >> 24695175

Rod hue biases for foveal stimuli on CRT displays.

Katharina G Foote, Steven L Buck.   

Abstract

Signals from rod photoreceptors bias (shift) the hues determined by cone photoreceptors for extrafoveal mesopic stimuli, creating green, blue, and red rod hue biases at long, middle, and short wavelengths, respectively. The fovea contains far fewer rods and S cones but may not be immune to rod hue biases. Here, we determine the biases found for mesopic foveal stimuli presented on a CRT display. The rod green bias was observed at unique yellow for all but one observer with 2° tests and persisted for most observers with 0.5° tests. The rod red bias typically seen at unique blue in extrafoveal studies was not apparent for either size of foveal test stimulus, and it was sometimes replaced by a rod green bias. The rod blue bias typically seen at unique green and unique red in extrafoveal studies was weak on average and inconsistent for both sizes of foveal test stimuli. Thus, small mesopic foveal stimuli permit rod influence on M- and L-cone color pathways but disadvantage rod influence on S-cone pathways, perhaps because of the sparseness of foveal S-cones. However, some observers did show idiosyncratic foveal rod hue biases that do not follow the general trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695175      PMCID: PMC4530640          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  14 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Time-dependent changes of rod influence on hue perception.

Authors:  Roger Knight; Steven L Buck
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Generality of rod hue biases with smaller, brighter, and photopically specified stimuli.

Authors:  Laura P Thomas; Steven L Buck
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Matching rod percepts with cone stimuli.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny; Vivianne C Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Do rods influence the hue of foveal stimuli?

Authors:  Steven L Buck; Laura P Thomas; Nick Hillyer; Eric M Samuelson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Foveal and extra-foveal influences on rod hue biases.

Authors:  Laura P Thomas; Steven L Buck
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Rod influence on hue-scaling functions.

Authors:  S L Buck; R Knight; G Fowler; B Hunt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Unique hue judgments as a function of test size in the fovea and at 20-deg temporal eccentricity.

Authors:  J L Nerger; V J Volbrecht; C J Ayde
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Foveal tritanopia.

Authors:  D R Williams; D I MacLeod; M M Hayhoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Human photoreceptor topography.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K R Sloan; R E Kalina; A E Hendrickson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.