Hiroaki Shigemura1, Naotaka Ishiguro, Yasuo Inoshima. 1. Laboratory of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Cooperative Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.
Abstract
Serum amyloid A (SAA) proteins are acute-phase proteins and are classified into multiple isoforms; however, the biological functions of each SAA isoform are not fully understood. In this study, to clarify the roles of SAA3 in the intestine, we characterized mRNA expression in mouse colonic epithelial CMT-93 cells treated with rotavirus, Toxoplasma, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli, as well as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and recombinant murine SAAs (rSAAs). E. coli together with LPS, but not the other pathogens, enhanced SAA3 mRNA expression. The mRNA expression of SAA3 by dead E. coli was higher than that by living E. coli, and the mRNA expression by E. coli and LPS increased in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, mRNA expressions of SAA1 and/or SAA2 were not stimulated by any of the treatments. In comparisons of cell treatments with rSAA1 or rSAA3, rSAA3 significantly up-regulated the mRNA expression of mucin 2 (MUC2), a major component of the mucus layer of the intestines that acts as an epithelial cell barrier against pathogens, while MUC2 mRNA expression was not significantly increased by E. coli and LPS. Furthermore, treatment with rSAAs intensively induced tumor necrosis factor-α mRNA expression. These results suggest that SAA3 plays a role in host innate immunity in the colon by up-regulating MUC2 mucin production, which builds a physiological barrier of colonic epithelia against bacterial invasion.
Serum amyloid A (SAA) proteins are acute-phase proteins and are classified into multiple isoforms; however, the biological functions of each SAA isoform are not fully understood. In this study, to clarify the roles of SAA3 in the intestine, we characterized mRNA expression in mouse colonic epithelial CMT-93 cells treated with rotavirus, Toxoplasma, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli, as well as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and recombinant murine SAAs (rSAAs). E. coli together with LPS, but not the other pathogens, enhanced SAA3 mRNA expression. The mRNA expression of SAA3 by dead E. coli was higher than that by living E. coli, and the mRNA expression by E. coli and LPS increased in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, mRNA expressions of SAA1 and/or SAA2 were not stimulated by any of the treatments. In comparisons of cell treatments with rSAA1 or rSAA3, rSAA3 significantly up-regulated the mRNA expression of mucin 2 (MUC2), a major component of the mucus layer of the intestines that acts as an epithelial cell barrier against pathogens, while MUC2 mRNA expression was not significantly increased by E. coli and LPS. Furthermore, treatment with rSAAs intensively induced tumornecrosis factor-α mRNA expression. These results suggest that SAA3 plays a role in host innate immunity in the colon by up-regulating MUC2 mucin production, which builds a physiological barrier of colonic epithelia against bacterial invasion.
Serum amyloid A (SAA) proteins are acute-phase proteins [21, 25] and are precursors of amyloid A (AA)
fibrils in AA amyloidosis [14]. The concentration of
SAAs in plasma dramatically increases up to 1,000-fold during inflammation [25], and the increase of SAA in plasma is used as a
clinical biomarker of inflammation and infection. Although SAA is usually degraded rapidly,
continuously elevated SAA levels in plasma are considered a high risk factor for AA
amyloidosis, which often results from a severe complication of chronic diseases, such as
rheumatoid arthritis and autoinflammatory diseases [14].In a variety of mammalian species, multiple SAA isoforms have been described, such as SAA1,
2, 3 and 4 in humans and mice. SAA1 and SAA2 are the major acute-phase isoforms and are mainly
expressed in hepatocytes [23, 25], and SAA1 is considered the main precursor of AA fibrils [4, 9, 13]. MurineSAA1 was formerly called SAA2 until a revision
of the nomenclature in 1999 [19]. In mice, SAA1 and
SAA2 genes (GenBank accession nos. BC087933 and M11130) share 95.1% and 92.6% sequence
identities in 369 nucleotides and 122 amino acids, respectively. In contrast to the similarity
between SAA1 and SAA2, nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities between SAA1 and SAA3
(NM011315) are 74.3% and 64.7%, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S1). SAA3 in mice is expressed
from extrahepatic cells, such as macrophages and adipocytes [12, 25], and SAA3 does not contribute to
circulating SAA levels in plasma [1]. Interestingly,
humanSAA3 is a pseudogene and is not expressed [7,
18]. These divergent biological and genetic
characteristics between SAA1/2 and SAA3 indicate that the functions of SAA3 in hosts are not
the same as those of SAA1/2. However, the roles of SAA3 are not fully understood.Recently, Reigstad et al. [17]
reported that SAA3 expression is increased in the mouse colon surface in the presence of
microbiota. Moreover, SAA3 expression is strongly induced by Escherichia colilipopolysaccharide (LPS) in murine colonic epithelial cell lines, whereas LPS does not
up-regulate SAA1/2 expression [2]. These studies on the
SAA3 response against bacteria suggest the involvement of SAA3 in intestinal immunity.
Furthermore, previous studies have shown that SAA is produced in response to inflammatory
cytokines, particularly tumornecrosis factor (TNF)- α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 [24], and also reported that SAA proteins have cytokine-like
activities, such as the ability to induce IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α [15, 20]. However, the exact role of
SAA3 has not been determined. In the present study, we investigated mRNA expression in mouse
colonic epithelial cells, focusing especially on mucin 2 (MUC2), after treatment with several
pathogens and recombinant SAAs (rSAAs). MUC2 is a major mucin of mucus in the colon [16, 28], and MUC2
mucin builds a mucus barrier that separates bacteria from the colon epithelia [6].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Recombinant murineSAA1 and SAA3: The coding region of murineSAA (amino
acids 20 to 122, Supplemental Fig. S1) was amplified from hepatic mRNA by
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as follows. Total RNA was extracted
from the liver of a normal mouse by an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genes of
SAA1 and SAA3 were amplified by RT-PCR using a Titan One Tube RT-PCR Kit (Roche Diagnostics,
Mannheim, Germany). Primers specific for SAA1 and SAA3 were designed based on the sequences
(BC087933 and NM011315), and primer sequences that included Sac I and
Kpn I restriction endonuclease sites were as follows:SAA1 F: 5′-CCC CCC GAG CTC GGG TTT TTT TCA TTT GTT-3′SAA1 R: 5′-A AAC GGT ACC TCA GTA TTT GTC AGG CAG-3′SAA3 F: 5′-CCC CCC GAG CTC AGA TGG GTC CAG TTC ATG-3′SAA3 R: 5′-A AAC GGT ACC TCA GTA TCT TTT AGG CAG-3′The amplified PCR fragments of SAA1 and SAA3 were digested with Sac I and
Kpn I (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and cloned between the Sac
I and Kpn I sites of the pRSET A expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA, U.S.A.). Sequences of the cloned plasmids were confirmed by sequencing. Plasmid DNA was
transformed into E. coliBL21 (DE3) pLysS (Invitrogen), and expressed
proteins were purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography using Chelating Sepharose
Fast Flow (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, U.K.) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Proteins were eluted from the Ni2+ column with guanidine buffer at
pH 7.8, pH 4.9 and pH 4.3, and their purity was checked by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and coomassie brilliant blue (CBB)
staining and western blot (WB) analysis. Then, purified fractions were dialyzed against
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.5 M NaCl. Dialyzed solutions were concentrated by
Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters Ultracel-10K (Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland) and used as
recombinant SAAs (rSAAs).CBB staining and WB analysis: After SDS-PAGE, gels were stained with CBB
staining solution (0.25% CBB, 5% methanol, and 7.5% acetic acid) for 30 min. Then, gels were
destained by destaining solution (25% methanol and 7.5% acetic acid) several times. For WB
analysis, proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P,
Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, U.S.A.) blocked with 5% nonfat milk in PBS supplemented with
0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the
membrane was incubated with Anti-Xpress antibody (1:5,000, R910-25, Invitrogen) in 1% nonfat
milk in PBST for 1 hr at room temperature. After washing three times with PBST, the membrane
was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (GE Healthcare)
in 1% nonfat milk in PBST for 1 hr at room temperature. After washing three times, the
peroxidase activity was detected using ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE
Healthcare) and visualized by X-ray film (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).Cells: Murine colonic epithelial cells, CMT-93, were purchased from ECACC
(Salisbury, U.K.) and used in this study. Murine fibroblast cells, NIH3T3, were also used.
Both were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s minimal essential medium (DMEM, Wako,
Osaka, Japan) containing 100 U/ml penicillin, 100
µg/ml streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA
Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria). Cells were seeded at 1 × 106 cells in
60-mm dishes and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 15
± 3 hr before experiments.Preparation of pathogens: Rotavirus strain Wa [22] was kindly provided by Dr. M. Sugiyama (Gifu University, Gifu,
Japan). Viruses were treated with 10 µg/ml trypsin in DMEM
at 37°C for 30 min. Then, viruses were inoculated to CMT-93 cells. Toxoplasma
gondii strain PLK was kindly provided by Dr. Y. Takashima (Gifu University).
Toxoplasma was collected by centrifugation at 600 × g
for 10 min and washed with PBS. This procedure was repeated twice, and then,
Toxoplasma was inoculated to CMT-93 cells. E. coli
strain O157 lacking the production of Vero-toxin and Staphylococcus aureus
strain 209P were used as Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, and were
grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C. After overnight incubations, bacteria were
collected by centrifugation at 6,300 × g for 5 min, and the pellets were
washed with PBS. This procedure was repeated twice, and then, bacteria were aliquoted. One
suspension was boiled for 15 min, and the other was placed on ice to retard the bacterial
growth until use. After the boiling or cooling step, samples were adjusted to 37°C and
inoculated to cells. To estimate cell counts of E.
coli and S. aureus, bacteria were serially diluted
with PBS and plated on LB agar at 37°C for 24 hr.Inoculation of pathogens, LPS and rSAAs: CMT-93 cells were washed twice
with PBS, inoculated with pathogens rotavirus (8.0 × 104 tissue culture infective
dose for 50% (TCID50)/ml), Toxoplasma (2.7 ×
106 cells/ml), S. aureus (5.2 ×
107 colony forming units (CFU)/ml) and E.
coli(~7.3 × 108 CFU/ml) suspended in DMEM and incubated at 37°C for
2 hr. Cells were also incubated with 0.1–100 µg/ml LPS
from E. coli O111:B4 (L2630, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.), rSAA1
(34 µg/ml) and rSAA3
(100 µg/ml) at 37°C for 2 hr. Control cells were not
inoculated with any pathogens or rSAAs. After incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS,
and total RNA was extracted immediately. Isolated RNA was stored at −80°C until use.Real-time PCR: RNA was quantified using a Gene Quant 100 (GE Healthcare)
and depleted of contaminating DNA with DNase I (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using a
SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out in 48-well plates
using the final concentrations of 250 nmol each of forward and reverse primes, 1 × Fast SYBR
Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) and 5 ng
of cDNA. Thermal cycling conditions were 20 sec at 95°C followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 3
sec and 60°C for 30 sec. Data were collected using a StepOne analytical thermal cycler
(Applied Biosystems). mRNA expressions of SAA1/2, SAA3, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MUC2 and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were investigated by using specific primers
for real-time PCR. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. Data were normalized to the
expression of GAPDH mRNA as an endogenous gene, and fold-changes relative to control levels
were determined by the ΔΔCt method [32]. A
melting-curve analysis of amplification products was performed at the end of each PCR
reaction. All experiments were replicated at least three times.
*SAA, serum amyloid A; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumornecrosis factor-α; MUC2, mucin 2; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.Statistical analysis: Data were expressed as means ± standard errors and
analyzed for statistical significance by unpaired two-tailed t-tests.
RESULTS
Expression of recombinant SAA1 and SAA3: The molecular weights of
expressed rSAA1 and rSAA3 were approximately 16.1 kDa, and both CBB staining and WB analysis
detected the expected sized bands (Fig.1). The approximately 30 kDa-sized proteins seemed to be dimers of rSAAs.
Fig. 1.
Expressed recombinant SAA1 and SAA3. (A) CBB staining. (B) WB analysis using an
anti-Xpress antibody. Expected sized rSAA1 and rSAA3 (approximately 16.1 kDa) were
detected. Approximately 30 kDa proteins seemed to be dimers of SAAs. Lane 1, rSAA1;
Lane 2, rSAA3.
Expressed recombinant SAA1 and SAA3. (A) CBB staining. (B) WB analysis using an
anti-Xpress antibody. Expected sized rSAA1 and rSAA3 (approximately 16.1 kDa) were
detected. Approximately 30 kDa proteins seemed to be dimers of SAAs. Lane 1, rSAA1;
Lane 2, rSAA3.Comparison of mRNA expression of SAAs: To assess whether representative
intestinal pathogens affected the mRNA expression of SAAs, rotavirus,
Toxoplasma, S. aureus and E. coli were
inoculated to CMT-93 cells. As mentioned above, since the sequences of SAA1 and SAA2 genes
are highly conserved, we used primers for the detection both of SAA1 and SAA2 mRNAs as an
indistinguishable SAA1/2 mRNA as described previously [2]. SAA1/2 mRNA expression in CMT-93 cells was not changed significantly by
inoculation with the four different pathogens compared with the control (Fig. 2A). However, SAA3 mRNA expression was induced by inoculation with E.
coli (Fig. 2A). SAA1/2 mRNA expression
was not changed by inoculation with either Gram-positive S. aureus or
Gram-negative E. coli, whether living or dead, at the same bacterial
concentrations (107 CFU/ml) (Fig. 2B). In contrast, SAA3 mRNA
expression was apparently increased by dead E. coli (Fig. 2B). To analyze the
influence of living or dead bacteria in detail, living and dead E. coli at
different amounts were inoculated to CMT-93 cells. Both living and dead E.
coli induced SAA3 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner, whereas SAA1/2 mRNA
expression was not enhanced (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.
Comparison of mRNA expressions of SAA1/2 and SAA3 in CMT-93 cells. (A) CMT-93 cells
were inoculated with rotavirus, Toxoplasma, S.
aureus and E. coli for 2 hr at 37°C. (B) CMT-93 cells were
inoculated with living or dead S. aureus, and living or dead
E. coli at the same bacterial concentrations (107
CFU/ml) for 2 hr at 37°C. (C) CMT-93 cells were inoculated
with different amounts of living or dead E. coli for 2 hr at 37°C.
(D) CMT-93 cells were inoculated with different amounts of LPS for 2 hr at 37°C. The
relative mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2 and SAA3 were corrected with GAPDH and then
compared with the control. Data are the means of 8 independent observations with
standard errors represented by vertical bars. Asterisks indicate significant
differences compared with the control. *, P<0.05; **,
P<0.01.
Comparison of mRNA expressions of SAA1/2 and SAA3 in CMT-93 cells. (A) CMT-93 cells
were inoculated with rotavirus, Toxoplasma, S.
aureus and E. coli for 2 hr at 37°C. (B) CMT-93 cells were
inoculated with living or dead S. aureus, and living or dead
E. coli at the same bacterial concentrations (107
CFU/ml) for 2 hr at 37°C. (C) CMT-93 cells were inoculated
with different amounts of living or dead E. coli for 2 hr at 37°C.
(D) CMT-93 cells were inoculated with different amounts of LPS for 2 hr at 37°C. The
relative mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2 and SAA3 were corrected with GAPDH and then
compared with the control. Data are the means of 8 independent observations with
standard errors represented by vertical bars. Asterisks indicate significant
differences compared with the control. *, P<0.05; **,
P<0.01.Gram-negative E. coli, but not Gram-positive S. aureus,
induced SAA3 mRNA expression, and dead E. coli up-regulated SAA3 mRNA
expression higher than did living E. coli (Fig. 2C). LPS induced SAA3
mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner, while SAA1/2 mRNA expression did not change by
exposure to LPS (Fig. 2D). SAA3 mRNA expression was strongly induced by LPS even more so
than by dead E. coli (Fig. 2C and
2D).Induction of MUC2 mRNA expression: CMT-93 and NIH3T3 cells were incubated
with rSAA1, rSAA3, E. coli and LPS. rSAA1 and rSAA3 induced MUC2 mRNA
expression in CMT-93 cells about 4.3-fold and 12.0-fold, respectively, whereas inducible
expression was not observed in NIH3T3 cells (Fig.
3). Living and dead E. coli and LPS did not significantly stimulate
MUC2 mRNA expression (Fig. 3). These results
suggest that SAA proteins have the ability to up-regulate MUC2 mRNA expression.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of MUC2 mRNA expression in CMT-93 and NIH3T3 cells. CMT-93 cells were
inoculated with rSAA1, rSAA3, living or dead E. coli, or LPS. Murine
fibroblast NIH3T3 cells were used as control cells. The relative mRNA expression
levels of MUC2 were corrected with GAPDH and then compared with controls. Data are the
means of at least 3 observations with standard errors represented by vertical
bars.
Comparison of MUC2 mRNA expression in CMT-93 and NIH3T3 cells. CMT-93 cells were
inoculated with rSAA1, rSAA3, living or dead E. coli, or LPS. Murine
fibroblast NIH3T3 cells were used as control cells. The relative mRNA expression
levels of MUC2 were corrected with GAPDH and then compared with controls. Data are the
means of at least 3 observations with standard errors represented by vertical
bars.Induction of mRNA expression of cytokines: The mRNA expression of
inflammatory cytokines was also measured in CMT-93 cells treated with rSAAs and E.
coli. Both rSAA1 and rSAA3 enhanced TNF-α mRNA expression, as consistent with
previous reports [15, 20] (Fig. 4). On the other hand, IL-1β mRNA expression was not detected (data not shown). In
comparisons between rSAA1 and rSAA3 treatment, rSAA3 induced TNF-α mRNA expression
intensively. mRNA expressions of SAA1/2 and SAA3 did not change significantly by treatment
with rSAAs (Fig. 4). Both living and dead
E. coli stimulated mRNA expressions of IL-6 and TNF-α, and the expression
level was higher than that by rSAAs (Fig. 4).
IL-1β mRNA expression was not stimulated by E. coli (data not shown).
Fig. 4.
Comparison of mRNA expressions of SAAs and cytokines in CMT-93 cells. CMT-93 cells
were incubated with rSAA1, rSAA3, or living or dead E. coli for 2 hr
at 37°C. mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2, SAA3, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were measured.
IL-1β mRNA expression was not detected. The relative mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2,
SAA3, IL-6 and TNF-α were corrected with GAPDH and then compared with controls. Data
are the means of at least 3 observations with standard errors represented by vertical
bars.
Comparison of mRNA expressions of SAAs and cytokines in CMT-93 cells. CMT-93 cells
were incubated with rSAA1, rSAA3, or living or dead E. coli for 2 hr
at 37°C. mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2, SAA3, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were measured.
IL-1β mRNA expression was not detected. The relative mRNA expression levels of SAA1/2,
SAA3, IL-6 and TNF-α were corrected with GAPDH and then compared with controls. Data
are the means of at least 3 observations with standard errors represented by vertical
bars.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we demonstrated that the Gram-negative bacterium E. coli,
but not the other pathogens, induced SAA3 mRNA expression significantly in mouse colonic
epithelial CMT-93 cells, whereas SAA1/2 mRNA expression was not enhanced by treatment with
these pathogens. SAA3 mRNA expression by dead E. coli was higher than that
by living E. coli. This might have been caused by the influence of LPS,
because LPS is a major component of Gram-negative bacterial membranes. The bursting of
E. coli membranes by boiling results in increased amounts of LPS. We
observed increased expression of SAA3 mRNA by LPS in a dose-dependent manner as previously
described [2, 17]. Furthermore, MUC2 mRNA expression was significantly up-regulated by SAAs,
especially by SAA3, but not by E. coli and LPS. It might be because of a
delayed effect of SAA3 protein production after SAA3 mRNA expression. These results suggest
that SAA3 plays a role in innate immunity in the colon by up-regulating MUC2 mucin
production.Intestinal epithelial cells together with the mucus layer act as a physiological barrier
against pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoa, as well as harmless commensal bacteria
[3, 10]. In
the human colon, 1013-1014 microbes cohabitate peacefully with host
immunity and establish intestinal homeostasis [3,
29]. MUC2 mucin-deficient mice do not build a mucus
layer above the epithelial cells in the colon, and direct contact of bacteria with
epithelial cells, invasion into the crypts [6] and
spontaneous inflammation [26, 27] are observed. Consistent with a previous report [2], we observed that SAA1/2 mRNA expression was not
inducible by any treatment, but rather that SAA1/2 mRNA was constantly expressed. Although
the stimulation levels of rSAA1 for MUC2 mRNA expression were lower than those of rSAA3,
both rSAA1 and rSAA3 apparently function to augment MUC2 mRNA expression. Additionally,
rSAA3 and E. coli strongly enhanced the mRNA expression of the inflammatory
cytokine TNF-α. It has been reported that SAA3 mRNA expression is induced by TNF-α in CMT-93
cells [17] and also that TNF-α induces MUC2 mRNA
expression in human colonic epithelial HT-29 cells [5]. These results suggest that SAA1/2 may continuously stimulate MUC2 mucin
production and build a mucosal layer for “peaceful cohabitation” with harmless commensal
bacteria under intestinal homeostasis. When bacteria attack colonic epithelial cells, mRNA
expressions of SAA3 and inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, are induced, TNF-α also
induces SAA3 mRNA expression, and then, produced SAA3 protein up-regulates MUC2 mucin
production in cooperation with TNF-α, which leading to the protection of colonic epithelial
cells from bacterial invasion.Up-regulation of MUC2 mRNA expression by rSAAs was demonstrated in this study. Contrary to
our results, Mack et al. [11]
demonstrated no differences in MUC2 mRNA expression by various kinds of peptides from bovine
mammary-associated SAA3 (M-SAA3) in human colonic epithelial HT-29 cells. There are at least
two possibilities for this discrepancy. First, it may be due to the length of the peptides.
Here, we used rSAA3 as a mature-length protein. On the other hand, Mack et
al. used 4- to 10-mer peptides from bovine M-SAA3, which may not have full
biological activity. Second, it may be due to species differences. This study showed the
effects of murineSAA3 on murine colonic intestinal CMT-93 cells, while Mack et
al. applied bovine M-SAA3 on human colonic epithelial HT-29 cells. To clarify
this difference, further investigations are needed.We showed that SAA3 mRNA expression was induced by E. coli and LPS, and
that SAA3 protein was capable of up-regulating MUC2 mRNA expression in mouse colonic
epithelial cells. Since we did not detect MUC2 mucin production in this study, further
investigations both in vitro and in vivo are needed to
elucidate the biological functions of SAA3 in the colon.
Authors: Maria Van der Sluis; Barbara A E De Koning; Adrianus C J M De Bruijn; Anna Velcich; Jules P P Meijerink; Johannes B Van Goudoever; Hans A Büller; Jan Dekker; Isabelle Van Seuningen; Ingrid B Renes; Alexandra W C Einerhand Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M Wlodarska; B Willing; K M Keeney; A Menendez; K S Bergstrom; N Gill; S L Russell; B A Vallance; B B Finlay Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Yuan H Yang; Eric F Morand; Stephen J Getting; Mark Paul-Clark; Dong L Liu; Simon Yona; Robert Hannon; Julia C Buckingham; Mauro Perretti; Roderick J Flower Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-03
Authors: Sara Abouelasrar Salama; Mirre De Bondt; Nele Berghmans; Mieke Gouwy; Vivian Louise Soares de Oliveira; Sergio C Oliveira; Flavio A Amaral; Paul Proost; Jo Van Damme; Sofie Struyf; Mieke De Buck Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.711