Rasmus Waehrens1, Henrik Ohlsson1, Jan Sundquist2, Kristina Sundquist2, Bengt Zöller1. 1. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: IBS aggregates in families, but the familial risk of IBS has only been determined in first-degree relatives and spouses. This nationwide study aimed to determine the familial risk of IBS in first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree relatives and spouses of affected individuals in order to estimate the relative influences of genes and shared family environment. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study. The Swedish Multigeneration Register was linked to the Hospital Discharge Register for the period 1987-2010 and the Swedish Outpatient Care Register for 2001-2010. ORs for IBS were calculated for relatives of individuals who had been diagnosed with IBS compared with relatives of individuals unaffected by IBS as the reference group. ORs were also determined for IBS cases diagnosed in primary healthcare in four Swedish counties (2001-2007). RESULTS: The ORs for IBS were 1.75 in siblings (95% CI 1.63 to 1.89), 1.82 in offspring (1.67 to 1.97), 1.90 in parents (1.76 to 2.05), 1.10 in maternal half-siblings (0.88 to 1.39), 1.78 in paternal half-siblings (1.48 to 2.15), 1.27 in nieces/nephews (1.18 to 1.38), 1.11 in cousins (1.04 to 1.18), and 1.51 in spouses (1.24 to 1.84) of probands diagnosed with IBS. The OR for probands diagnosed in primary healthcare was 1.82 in siblings (1.52 to 2.18), and 1.82 in offspring (1.49 to 2.21). CONCLUSIONS: The increased IBS risk among first-degree relatives and also second-degree and third-degree relatives indicates a genetic component of the familial clustering of IBS. However, a non-genetic contribution is also suggested by the increased risk among spouses. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES:IBS aggregates in families, but the familial risk of IBS has only been determined in first-degree relatives and spouses. This nationwide study aimed to determine the familial risk of IBS in first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree relatives and spouses of affected individuals in order to estimate the relative influences of genes and shared family environment. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study. The Swedish Multigeneration Register was linked to the Hospital Discharge Register for the period 1987-2010 and the Swedish Outpatient Care Register for 2001-2010. ORs for IBS were calculated for relatives of individuals who had been diagnosed with IBS compared with relatives of individuals unaffected by IBS as the reference group. ORs were also determined for IBS cases diagnosed in primary healthcare in four Swedish counties (2001-2007). RESULTS: The ORs for IBS were 1.75 in siblings (95% CI 1.63 to 1.89), 1.82 in offspring (1.67 to 1.97), 1.90 in parents (1.76 to 2.05), 1.10 in maternal half-siblings (0.88 to 1.39), 1.78 in paternal half-siblings (1.48 to 2.15), 1.27 in nieces/nephews (1.18 to 1.38), 1.11 in cousins (1.04 to 1.18), and 1.51 in spouses (1.24 to 1.84) of probands diagnosed with IBS. The OR for probands diagnosed in primary healthcare was 1.82 in siblings (1.52 to 2.18), and 1.82 in offspring (1.49 to 2.21). CONCLUSIONS: The increased IBS risk among first-degree relatives and also second-degree and third-degree relatives indicates a genetic component of the familial clustering of IBS. However, a non-genetic contribution is also suggested by the increased risk among spouses. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Ferdinando Bonfiglio; Tenghao Zheng; Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria; Fatemeh Hadizadeh; Luis Bujanda; Francesca Bresso; Lars Agreus; Anna Andreasson; Aldona Dlugosz; Greger Lindberg; Peter T Schmidt; Pontus Karling; Bodil Ohlsson; Magnus Simren; Susanna Walter; Gerardo Nardone; Rosario Cuomo; Paolo Usai-Satta; Francesca Galeazzi; Matteo Neri; Piero Portincasa; Massimo Bellini; Giovanni Barbara; Anna Latiano; Matthias Hübenthal; Vincent Thijs; Mihai G Netea; Daisy Jonkers; Lin Chang; Emeran A Mayer; Mira M Wouters; Guy Boeckxstaens; Michael Camilleri; Andre Franke; Alexandra Zhernakova; Mauro D'Amato Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Anil S Sarica; Serhat Bor; Mehmet N Orman; Hector Barajas-Martinez; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Charles Antzelevitch; Can Hasdemir Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.133